• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Transparent Shaping, NAT OFF.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Traffic Shaping
6 Posts 2 Posters 2.6k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Offline
    davefl
    last edited by Feb 27, 2009, 2:37 PM

    Hello.

    I have the following setup:

    CABLE MODEM (Public IP) <–---------------> Wireless Router (192.168.1.x)

    What I would like to do is:

    CABLE MODEM (Public IP) <---- pfSense  ----> Wireless Router (192.168.1.x)

    I need pfSense for traffic shaping purposes.  I need it to work transparently.  No Nat on pfsense, instead that will be handled by the Wireless Router.  Also it should truly be transparent -- the computers on the wireless router should not have to modify their configuration.

    The trouble is that the IP from the Cable Modem is dynamic and must be gathered from DHCP.

    Can pfSense do this?  If so, how?

    I notice from the documentation: http://pfsense.trendchiller.com/transparent_firewall.pdf that it seems as if the WAN must have a static IP.  Perhaps I am in error?

    Thank you.

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • E Offline
      eri--
      last edited by Feb 27, 2009, 10:33 PM Feb 27, 2009, 10:12 PM

      Transparent(bridge) shaping can be done correctly only on 2.0 and not on 1.2+.

      Edit:
      Actually you can shape if you bridge 2 interfaces only on 1.2+.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • D Offline
        davefl
        last edited by Mar 2, 2009, 1:43 PM

        @ermal:

        Transparent(bridge) shaping can be done correctly only on 2.0 and not on 1.2+.

        Edit:
        Actually you can shape if you bridge 2 interfaces only on 1.2+.

        So I can do this using 2.0 and the linked pdf document's instructions?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • E Offline
          eri--
          last edited by Mar 2, 2009, 6:40 PM

          Well shaping on 2.0 is totally different than 1.2.
          For 2.0 you just run a wizard and create firewall rules and assign queues to them.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • D Offline
            davefl
            last edited by Mar 2, 2009, 9:10 PM

            @ermal:

            Well shaping on 2.0 is totally different than 1.2.
            For 2.0 you just run a wizard and create firewall rules and assign queues to them.

            So in 2.0 the wizard will assist in setting up a transparent shaper (as specified above and i should not use the linked instructions?).  Sorry for the questions I just want to have everything planned before I actually jump into this.

            All I want is a transparent shaper which passes packets between WAN (cable modem) <-> LAN (wireless router WAN/LAN) without any interference (not really a true firewall).  I just need it to do some shaping, particularly with p2p (torrent) traffic.  That's it.

            I get that I will have to set up queues ad allocate bandwidth between them.  My main concern first is just getting a transparent "firewall" in place. as quickly as possible to the point where it is functional (routes packets between WAN and LAN transparently).  Then I can tweak the shaping.

            Any particular guides or walkthroughs for doing this on 2.0?  I have tried looking at the docs (as you can see), but i gues sI might be looking at obsolete info.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • E Offline
              eri--
              last edited by Mar 2, 2009, 9:56 PM

              Just run the wizard it will help.
              If you want try out the layer7 shaper to 'really' shape bitorrent.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              6 out of 6
              • First post
                6/6
                Last post
              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
                consent.not_received