• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Kb + Kilobits – interface BUG ? (Urgent)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Traffic Shaping
6 Posts 2 Posters 2.4k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C
    cylent
    last edited by Dec 23, 2009, 2:21 PM

    There is a bug or an error in the "Firewall: Shaper: Queues: Edit" section.
    i was editing the qWanRoot and noticed that two selections that mean the same on the list. next to the number field there was an option for "Kb" and "Kilobits"
    there is nothing for KB or Kilobytes.

    so my question now is .. are those two intentionally the same or is one supposed to mean Kilobytes and is a typo?

    because obviously if i enter 768Kbits (my connection) and the system had selected KB that would really screw up my traffic shapping.

    currently i selected "Kilobits" … i hope i did right?

    please advise.

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • D
      danswartz
      last edited by Dec 23, 2009, 4:48 PM

      I think this is just a confusing thing about the form.  There are not really two entries I can see.  If you set one of the other entries which are spelled out, I believe you will see the first entry change to the short form of that (e.g. kb instead of kilobits).

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • C
        cylent
        last edited by Dec 23, 2009, 6:25 PM

        thanks

        it would be nice to be sure about this since it can make a difference in the traffic shaping

        on a side note, when i enabled traffic shaping wizard the first time i did notice it  sort of slowed things down so maybe this has something to do with it?
        being that i may have selected KB instead of kb and it translated wrong.

        someone who can trace the code for this will help out.. please.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • D
          danswartz
          last edited by Dec 23, 2009, 6:31 PM

          I actually did look at the php code, and it does look like it is doing what I said.  If you can prove otherwise, I am happy to be corrected :)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • C
            cylent
            last edited by Dec 23, 2009, 6:35 PM

            ok
            so for my scenario of 768 down and 256 up.
            do i pick kb or the full word spelled out?
            pls advise.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • D
              danswartz
              last edited by Dec 23, 2009, 7:03 PM

              what i am trying to say is that kb is the current choice.  i am betting that if you pick 'kilobits', and the look again, it will still say kb.  for an experiment: change it to 2 megabits, and then when you look, i'm guessing it will say 'mb'.  obviously you don't want to leave it that way, just to prove/disprove the theory for your peace of mind.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              1 out of 6
              • First post
                1/6
                Last post
              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
                consent.not_received