• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Traffc Shaper in 1.2.3 is wors than 1.2.2

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Traffic Shaping
8 Posts 6 Posters 5.2k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S
    ssjoco
    last edited by Dec 28, 2009, 11:03 AM

    I updated the pfsense a week ago on my ALIX board. Everythings went well expect the ping became very high.
    I uploaded my old 1.2.2 config, which was tweaked for my 8M/512K DSL connection. I didn't have any problem so far in 1.2.2 the ping never reached 150ms.
    In 1.2.3 I get 500ms ping on traffic load and I can't get better result. Any idea?

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • C
      chance
      last edited by Jan 8, 2010, 8:37 PM

      Upgrading now, I have a pretty sophisticated traffic shaping config for a 7x768 cable connection, I will let you know if mine does the same thing, or not. My ping to google in my area is around 30ms all the time, has been for a few years.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • C
        chance
        last edited by Jan 8, 2010, 8:54 PM

        I will agree it's not as good, as my ping went from solid 30 to initial ping of 40-65 with successive pings falling to 30-35. Same rules, same cable. I guess there is just more going on with this version.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • B
          biatche
          last edited by Jan 16, 2010, 11:59 PM

          Maybe you should try pfsense 2.0 beta, I'm tempted to… things aren't working out for me too well in 1.2.3 as well

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • J
            jlepthien
            last edited by Jan 29, 2010, 7:15 PM

            2.0-beta does not work really good. I have two LAN interfaces and one WAN and the shaper wizard doesn't even complete with 2.0. Still very buggy this beast…

            Went back to 1.2.3

            | apple fanboy | music lover | network and security specialist | in love with cisco systems |

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • K
              kripz
              last edited by Jan 29, 2010, 10:07 PM

              I think im getting the same thing: http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,22353.0.html

              It honestly looks like it's not doing anything. Currently downloading some torrents and everything has come to a crawl.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • B
                biatche
                last edited by Feb 10, 2010, 9:05 AM

                I just upgraded from 1.2-RC3 (LOL) to 1.2.3 and upon testing with many users, I found spikes to 2000ms… using 85% of my actual connection speed, and putting unimportant traffic to queue prio 2,3 (with upper limit at another 85% off qW/Lanroot) while default is 4. I get heavy spikes and delay even for traffic under q6..

                Configuration is 95% the same as 1.2-RC3.. yea something just isn't right...

                nat reflection isn't quite working as well....

                1.2.3 is urgh... now i'm tempted to try 2.0.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • P
                  pirron
                  last edited by May 28, 2010, 11:58 PM

                  I can confirm that. I moved from 1.2.2 to 1.2.3 and ping issues started with nearly the same configuration.

                  That kind of suck cause I mainly choosed pfsense for it traffic shaper and it seems that the stable version with proper shaper would be 1.2.2 only which is somehow not stable on my net5500 box :(

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                    [[user:consent.lead]]
                    [[user:consent.not_received]]