Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    4GB NanoBSD Snapshots

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 1.2.3-PRERELEASE-TESTING snapshots - RETIRED
    15 Posts 7 Posters 10.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • G
      gloomrider
      last edited by

      @blewis:

      @gloomrider:

      Why not just buy the card and put the 2GB image on?  For nanobsd, bigger is the opposite of better!

      Won't having a bigger image means much more space for future addons/packages?

      Yes. But packages are the domain of spinning disk and the beauty of nanobsd is its compactness. I appreciate that people want to use ALL the space on the card, but the developers need to prioritize resources. How long before people ask for 16GB card images?  Right now a 2GB upgrade slice copy (1GB itself) takes ~220 seconds to copy on my ALIX 2D3 when the upgrade is applied.  I'm in the camp that packages should remain unsupported on the embedded flavor of pfSense.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • B
        blewis
        last edited by

        One of the package I'm thinking of adding is the FeeSWITCH package.  Even the author thinks at least 4GB is best.  For a simple home setup, not needing a power hungry small PC, the Alix+CF would be ideal.  I just saw a few new low power Intel Atom-based embedded network appliances w/ GigE ports pci-e & CF slots from Taiwan & China.  They look like excellent Alix replacements.

        Yeah, not sure why the Alix writes SO SLOWLY on CF cards. Maybe it's the CPU/Bus/driver issues.  The same high speed CF cards when placed into a regular PC w/ an adapter writes much quickly.

        Also, I just bought a new HP desktop, and it writes the image in a matter of seconds to my year old "high speed" 4GB CF card.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • valnarV
          valnar
          last edited by

          @blewis:

          I just saw a few new low power Intel Atom-based embedded network appliances w/ GigE ports pci-e & CF slots from Taiwan & China.  They look like excellent Alix replacements.

          Where?  ;D

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • B
            blewis
            last edited by

            Since we're getting a bit off topics, what the heck ::):

            I'm sure some of these will show up, re-branded by others with a price premium slapped on top of them, but one of the newer ones is this one: http://www.ibase.com.tw/2009/fwa6104.html

            Not exactly sure who "really" makes them.  Oftentimes they are the exact same board sold by several dealers at very different prices.  Another one is: http://www.made-in-china.com/showroom/norco-rachel/offer-detailJqaQLpoKOucb/1-Fanless-Network-Appliance-Based-on-Atom-N270-CPU-with-4x-LAN.html

            Right now, they are mostly sold to resellers and are purchased in large quantities. Runs about 1.6GHz & is fansless & can add a mini-pci VGA card if not planning on wireless.

            The cpu uses about 2.5 watts & chipset is about 6 watts, so it's not as bad as those 1st gen. Atoms, where the chipset needed a fan.

            I'm gonna wait till the end of the year when the're a bit cheaper  :-)  Just ignore the price they show, as it is ALWAYS very negotiable, once you discuss volume.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • C
              cozac
              last edited by

              @dotdash:

              The 4GB snaps should appear again: http://redmine.pfsense.org/repositories/revision/3/da7dd453100643a5a93170cd16c2577103c27547

              I can't find the snapshot for the 4GB, when will be available?

              Edit: Thanks for the new build. Found it now with date Aug 19, 2009 http://snapshots.pfsense.org/FreeBSD_RELENG_7_2/pfSense_RELENG_1_2/nanobsd/

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • W
                wlee618
                last edited by

                just wondering..
                1. is there any reason there are daily version of the different images?  bug fixes/enhancemmentS?
                2. i've tried to do the auto upgrade and after that, it blew up.. i had to reburn the image on my test 1GB CF card.
                3. so, i have decided to get a 4GB.. instead of 2GB.. only $2 differences… now it won't even find the card when i use the physdiskwrite.. anyone has any clue?
                4. i am also trying to use it on the alix 2c3 board.. anyone has any 'friendly' advise as far as.. what 'not' to do?

                thank you

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • G
                  gloomrider
                  last edited by

                  @wlee618:

                  just wondering..
                  1. is there any reason there are daily version of the different images?  bug fixes/enhancemmentS?
                  2. i've tried to do the auto upgrade and after that, it blew up.. i had to reburn the image on my test 1GB CF card.
                  3. so, i have decided to get a 4GB.. instead of 2GB.. only $2 differences… now it won't even find the card when i use the physdiskwrite.. anyone has any clue?
                  4. i am also trying to use it on the alix 2c3 board.. anyone has any 'friendly' advise as far as.. what 'not' to do?

                  thank you

                  Hi

                  • The builds are automated.  There's no guarantee that today's build will have different code than yesterday's.  But newer code is generally better.  YMMV.

                  • Auto upgrade is still broken for nanobsd as far as I know.  Manual update works, assuming you're running a manually flashed nanobsd instance

                  • Can you copy and paste the contents of the DOS window that gave the error(s)?

                  • Do you know what version of the ALIX BIOS you're running?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • W
                    wlee618
                    last edited by

                    @gloomrider:

                    @wlee618:

                    just wondering..
                    1. is there any reason there are daily version of the different images?  bug fixes/enhancemmentS?
                    2. i've tried to do the auto upgrade and after that, it blew up.. i had to reburn the image on my test 1GB CF card.
                    3. so, i have decided to get a 4GB.. instead of 2GB.. only $2 differences… now it won't even find the card when i use the physdiskwrite.. anyone has any clue?
                    4. i am also trying to use it on the alix 2c3 board.. anyone has any 'friendly' advise as far as.. what 'not' to do?

                    thank you

                    Hi

                    • The builds are automated.  There's no guarantee that today's build will have different code than yesterday's.  But newer code is generally better.  YMMV.

                    • Auto upgrade is still broken for nanobsd as far as I know.  Manual update works, assuming you're running a manually flashed nanobsd instance

                    • Can you copy and paste the contents of the DOS window that gave the error(s)?

                    • Do you know what version of the ALIX BIOS you're running?

                    1. thank you for the clarification. 
                    2. does that mean i should do a daily manual download and apply it to the '1st' slice?
                    3.–i will try to capture it next time
                    4. 0.99h.  maybe i am not clear aout my question.. i am just wondering if there's anything i should watch out for? like.. performance will degrade after certain amount of time...blah blah.

                    thank you :D

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • G
                      gloomrider
                      last edited by

                      2: No.  Assuming you already have a recent nanobsd instance (that you presumably flashed by hand), you can download an update suitable for the size of your CF card and use System:Firmware:Manual Update.  I just looked and I guess I hadn't noticed that Auto Update has been removed from the later snapshots.
                      4: The later snapshots seem quite stable.  I have not had issues for quite some time on my 2D3.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • W
                        wlee618
                        last edited by

                        @gloomrider:

                        2: No.  Assuming you already have a recent nanobsd instance (that you presumably flashed by hand), you can download an update suitable for the size of your CF card and use System:Firmware:Manual Update.  I just looked and I guess I hadn't noticed that Auto Update has been removed from the later snapshots.
                        4: The later snapshots seem quite stable.  I have not had issues for quite some time on my 2D3.

                        Great! thanks!

                        now, just wondering is there a special forum for the nanobsd package setup?  i have installed the imspector and denyhost and they both don't seem to be working.(no log for imspector and nothing with denyhost)…

                        thanks

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.