Lan to Lan VPN

[oko]

Customer requires that we connect to they network with Lan to Lan VPN. They give proper parameters and I get pfSense 1.2 to connect to they side.

Jan 28 10:54:48 racoon: [XXXXXX]: INFO: ISAKMP-SA expired XX.XX.XX.118[500]-YY.YY.YY.99[500] spi:1234567890abcdef:1234567890abcdef
Jan 28 10:53:50 racoon: [XXXXXX]: INFO: ISAKMP-SA established XX.XX.XX.118[500]-YY.YY.YY.99[500] spi:1234567890abcdef:1234567890abcdef
Jan 28 10:53:50 racoon: INFO: received Vendor ID: CISCO-UNITY
Jan 28 10:53:50 racoon: INFO: received Vendor ID: DPD
Jan 28 10:53:50 racoon: INFO: received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsra-isakmp-xauth-06.txt
Jan 28 10:53:50 racoon: INFO: begin Identity Protection mode.
Jan 28 10:53:50 racoon: [XXXXXX]: INFO: respond new phase 1 negotiation: XX.XX.XX.118[500]<=>YY.YY.YY.99[500]

But I can't ping or RDP to wanted host, and traceroute still goes to internet and not over VPN.

They want that I configure our Local subnet to be XX.XX.XX.118 ie. to our VPN gateway IP address, and I don't understand how to NAT trafic from our private address net to they public address net.

All tests which I have done with two psSense boxes uses Class-C local nets and trafic is routed well.

Is this suggested /required configuration possible at all or is other end guy simply lacking some knolidge also, when he states that they can't accept private class addresses as opposite side local lan?

[rkelleyrtp]

Can you please post a picture or diagram of what you are trying to do?  Screenshots of what you have configured in pfSense would be very helpful.