• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

MultiWAN PPPoe

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.0-RC Snapshot Feedback and Problems - RETIRED
4 Posts 2 Posters 1.9k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K Offline
    Kevin
    last edited by Jan 28, 2010, 8:38 PM Jan 28, 2010, 8:34 PM

    just curious if anyone has tried this successfully.  Some older post show it as broken and I tried a few months ago without sucess.  I have a site with 2 DSL's that I could test on, but would like to see if any known progress has been made.

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • D Offline
      dusan
      last edited by Jan 30, 2010, 1:16 PM

      I have 3 PPPoE links and I'm running the latest BETA-1 snapshot. It works, provided that the links are from different ISPs (to be exact, different gateways).

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • D Offline
        dusan
        last edited by Jan 30, 2010, 3:42 PM Jan 30, 2010, 3:28 PM

        Update 2010-01-30: From a generated pf rule
        pass in log quick on em1 route-to { (pppoe0 25.26.68.69), (em4 192.168.0.65), (em5 192.168.0.69) } round-robin inet all flags S/SA keep state label "USER_RULE: pass others out via any WAN"

        This is an outbound load-balancing rule. em1 = LAN, pppoe0 = WAN, em4 = OPT1, em5 = OPT2. I've connected two  PPPoE links sharing the same gateway to OPT1 and OPT2 through ISP's NAT devices, to address the route-to-gateway-only short-coming.

        Now, with RELENG_8_1 it appears that PF route-to function was improved. It can now route to interface and gateway thus the NAT devices seem to be no longer necessary.

        Untested. You should try it to see if this is true.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • K Offline
          Kevin
          last edited by Feb 4, 2010, 2:27 AM

          Thanks for the info.  I will give it another go shortly.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          4 out of 4
          • First post
            4/4
            Last post
          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
            This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
            consent.not_received