Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    WAN Load Balancing Uneven

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Routing and Multi WAN
    6 Posts 4 Posters 3.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • B
      blewis
      last edited by

      I realize pfsense can use either round-robin or a weighed round robin, but I often saturate one wan while the other one is not heavily utilized.  Is there a way for pfsense to use the least "used/busy/saturated" WAN connection based on the up/dl bandwidth that I specify.  I saw such a box in an office building many years ago, and a feature such as this is what I seem to need.   thanx…

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M
        Marito10
        last edited by

        Hi!
        I've the same question and didn't find a good answer in the forum.
        maybe one of the pfsense gurus can help Us?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • GruensFroeschliG
          GruensFroeschli
          last edited by

          No this is currently not possible.

          We do what we must, because we can.

          Asking questions the smart way: http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • B
            blewis
            last edited by

            I'm seeing a situation where users of some high speed sites which do not allow multiple/segmented downloads & pfsense will saturate or nearly saturate one of my wan, however somehow another users starts another download, it still somehow gets round robined to the already saturated line.  I tried a weighed round robin, but it only worked briefly as connection patterns changes.  Latency then goes thru the roof on the saturated line. I'm just trying to find a way to even out the usage based on user bandwidth utilization rather that round-robin so as to use both lines evenly.

            I just went searching around on google for a way & it seems to be quite expensive…  oh well...

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • C
              cmb
              last edited by

              There's no way to accommodate that type of balancing with PF, it's simply round robin on a connection basis, which is usually fine but has its caveats.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • B
                blewis
                last edited by

                I did a google search on the matter and they all seem to point to a company called peplink.  After looking at there specs, it offered 7 different load balance algorithms in addition to round-robin, I guess:

                Weighted
                Enforced
                Persistence
                Priority
                Overflow
                Least Used
                Lowest Latency Load Balancing Algorithms

                Does anyone know if they work or lockup under heavy load?  Their prices are too high, in my opinion…  Sure wish pfsense offers a few more algorithms to utilize my wans more efficiently.  Or perhaps thru addons....???

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • First post
                  Last post
                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.