LoadBalancing with Gateway group not working…
-
If your problem was like mine when I first tried multi-wan on 2.0, you'll need to disable sticky connections in the advanced settings.
-
Thanks for suggestion, but un-checking in System Administrator as sticky for Load Balance did not solve problem. I'm still able to use to 2 WAN if I have Gateway Group for my LAN firewall rule.
Here is how it setup for Gateway Group:
Group Name Gateways Priority Description
LoadBalance1 WAN2 Tier 1
WAN Tier 1Firewall Rule: LAN
Action: Pass
Interface: LAN
Protocal: Any
Source/Type: LAN Subnet
Destination: check not
Gateway: LoadBalance1Any other suggestions would be great!
-
it seems PBR can not work with Gateway-group!
and the PBR now have some question, the last version is not work fine! -
How do you setup Load Balance with 2 WAN in 2.0 without using PBR?
-
What is PBR?
-
Firewall Rule: LAN
Action: Pass
Interface: LAN
Protocal: Any
Source/Type: LAN Subnet
Destination: check not
Gateway: LoadBalance1Any other suggestions would be great!
Hi!
It seems you have the correct settings….
Maybe you can check some status pages like: Status -> Gateways
The first tab will show the gateways 'solo' and the second will show the status of the gateway group. Mine are like so:Can you ping a direct IP address on the internet instead of a hostname? Maybe it's a DNS problem?
Does your Systemlog -> Firewall show 'blocked packets'?Good luck!
-
-
Thanx!
-
your PBR can work fine without Gateway Group? in my version, it is can't work
-
Having similar problems. All traffic originating from lan subnet to port 80 tcp (=all http traffic) should go to one gw group but instead its not. If instead of the group use any of the wan gateway it works. 31.3 snapshot
-
Thanks for all your suggestions. I decide to go back to v1.2.3 until 2.0 is out of beta. Load Balancing works with v1.2.3 and easy to setup.
-
It is strange. From March 26 snapshot on PBR works perfectly for me. I can even use several gateway groups for HTTP traffics, depends on the destination.
-
Yes, I can confirm it working for me as well. It's the main reason I'm using pfSense instead of my home brew linux firewall where I only switch WANs on a host bases instead of protocol and time etc…