Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Reverse dns resolution of WAN ip

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.0-RC Snapshot Feedback and Problems - RETIRED
    3 Posts 2 Posters 4.2k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • K
      kpa
      last edited by

      Why does the dns forwarder return "hostname.localdomain" for reverse dns of the WAN ip address? Wouldn't it make more sense to leave the resolution to the ISP dns server (or whatever is configured at general setup)?

      This is what dig returns on my system when I query the dns forwarder listening at the LAN interface (joesgarage being my local domain, xxx blanks the last number of my IP)

      ;; ANSWER SECTION:
      xxx.217.223.80.in-addr.arpa. 1  IN      PTR    pfsense.joesgarage.

      Asking the ISP dns forwarder returns:

      ;; ANSWER SECTION:
      xxx.217.223.80.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN  PTR    dsl-hkibrasgw2-fed9df00-xxx.dhcp.inet.fi.

      This is on "2.0-BETA1 built on Wed Mar 31 01:56:32 EDT 2010",  I don't have a 1.2.x system to test if the same happens on 1.2.x.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • K
        kpa
        last edited by

        Ok, it turns out that WAN interface update script(s) add this entry to /etc/hosts:

        80.223.217.xxx pfsense.joesgarage pfsense

        I think this should be optional at least because now there is no way to override the reverse dns resolution of
        the WAN ip because its in /etc/hosts and dnsmasq seems to prefer /etc/hosts over command line exceptions.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • C
          cmb
          last edited by

          http://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/show/567

          Please post anything 2.0 related in the 2.0 board, we can't watch all the others as closely so issues on other boards can be overlooked.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • First post
            Last post
          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.