Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Virtual IP bugs

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.0-RC Snapshot Feedback and Problems - RETIRED
    6 Posts 3 Posters 2.4k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • G
      Gob
      last edited by

      Hi
      This week I regretably installed pfSense v.2 (20100514) Beta in a production environment as I really needed the ability to restrict certain pages of the pfSense web gui for a certain user. I have been testing v2 Beta for some time now and have found the core functionality to be pretty stable. The one area that it seems to fall down was with Virtual IPs.
      The site I installed this box in has a full /24 public IP range on its WAN. I was replacing an IPCop which had many port 80 forwarding rules for these public IP addresses to internal web servers. I first set about adding the IPs as Proxy Arp addresses under Virtual IPs. I decided to add them in chunks of smaller subnets, the first being:
      xxx.xxx.xxx.128/25

      I expected this to give me 128 usable IPs (128-255) to use within my NAT rules however I found only 8 addresses usable in the dropdown list (129-136). All other addresses that I needed above .136 required me to add the virtual IP individually.

      I figured that was a workable bug so I continued setting up the port forwarding rules.
      All appeared to be working fine until I had reports that one of the websites we were hosting was not accessible externally. In order to resolve this I had to delete the NAT/Firewall rules and then the Virtual IP. Then recreate the virtual IP and rules. that website worked fine but then a different site stopped working externally. Again using a virtual IP on port 80 going to a different LAN IP address. Again fixed by deleting the virtual IP.
      It appears that I can only use 1 virtual IP at a time?!?!

      As there is 4,000 miles and the Atlantic Ocean betwen me and this office, I had to revert back to their IPcop minutes before I flew back home.

      Anybody else experienced this issue?

      Gordon

      If I fix one more thing than I break in a day, it's a good day!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • jimpJ
        jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
        last edited by

        Are you on x86 or 64-bit?

        Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

        Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

        Do not Chat/PM for help!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • G
          Gob
          last edited by

          x86

          If I fix one more thing than I break in a day, it's a good day!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • C
            cmb
            last edited by

            I'm sure the NAT had nothing to do with it, it was probably entirely proxy ARP causing the difficulties. Others have reported similar issues with choparp. I suspect switching to CARP or IP Alias type VIPs would have fixed it.
            http://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/616

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • jimpJ
              jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
              last edited by

              There was a GUI bug where it only showed a few IPs out of a large block as a choice in the drop-down. I just committed a fix for this:

              https://rcs.pfsense.org/projects/pfsense/repos/mainline/commits/08a5d2eb844f98e3ff1fa59dc28a7f9134b08306
              https://rcs.pfsense.org/projects/pfsense/repos/mainline/commits/042fa85c3bdc51b5b99b2afef24a5077968ef31d

              Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

              Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

              Do not Chat/PM for help!

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • G
                Gob
                last edited by

                Thanks for the prompt attention guys.
                Will try and get a free trip back to New York to test  ;D

                BTW… thanks for the great book!

                If I fix one more thing than I break in a day, it's a good day!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • First post
                  Last post
                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.