Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Educate Me Please: Why Pfsense vs. basic $40 router?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    4 Posts 4 Posters 4.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • M
      mcz
      last edited by

      I am interested in creating a Pfsense router from an older machine I have, a P2 Celeron 333 Mhz, 192 mb ram.  This seems to meet the requirements for a home DSL connection.

      Why would I do this project vs. using the basic plastic box router from the store? 
      Is it more secure, how?
      Is wireless more secure, how?
      Will it allow rdp/nat without an external static ip?

      On a side note, I seem to be getting frozen connections every few hours on the $30 Belkin router I have.  Has anyone else had this issue?  Yes, this is one of the reasons I am reading about Pfsense before buying a similar product.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • S
        scoop
        last edited by

        In a SOHO setup there are many reasons to prefer pfSense over a cheap router:

        • More secure, because it's much better maintained. Firmware support on home grade routers is usually pretty horrible.

        • It's usually more powerful hardware-wise, or at least you can scale the hardware up to your needs.

        • You can better control the amount of concurrent connections supported by the device.

        • Yes, you can easily RDP in if you want, even with a dynamic IP through the use of dynamic DNS services - many routers support this though.

        • It is much more powerful software-wise, so it will allow much more advanced setups than home grade routers.

        • It is extensible through packages, so it facilitates a high level of customization.

        And the list goes on… In the end it's all about what you want of course.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • jimpJ
          jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
          last edited by

          I'm not sure what you mean "rdp/nat without an external static IP" but as for the others, it is more secure, if only because you have a lot more control over what is allowed and not allowed on every interface. You can block or pass traffic however you like.

          However, that hardware might work but it would be on the low end of capabilities in terms of throughput. Not to mention it may draw quite a lot of power, the cost of running that PC for a whole year might be significant.

          Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

          Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

          Do not Chat/PM for help!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • X
            XIII
            last edited by

            free tech support for life  ;D (via the forum)
            new features are added all the time (theres a lot of features)

            -Chris Stutzman
            Sys0:2.0.1: AMD Sempron 140 @2.7 1024M RAM 100GHD
            Sys1:2.0.1: Intel P4 @2.66 1024M RAM 40GHD
            freedns.afraid.org - Free DNS dynamic DNS subdomain and domain hosting.
            Check out the pfSense Wiki

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • First post
              Last post
            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.