3 WAN -> 1 LAN, cannot figure it out
-
Last week, we discarded our two residential connections in favor of three (3) business class cable connections from one company instead of two separate providers.
But I cannot get load balancing to work! I hoped to make gateway group kosh work, but it doesn't.
WAN01 - DHCP (currently 24.43.32.180), gateway 24.43.32.129 {wan}, Virtual IP 19.0.0.1/24
WAN02 - DHCP (currently 24.43.32.145), gateway 24.43.32.129 {opt1}, Virtual IP 18.0.0.1/24
WAN03 -DHCP (currently 24.43.32.143) ,gateway 24.43.32.129 {opt2}, Virtual IP 17.0.0.1/24My firewall rules are:
ID Proto Source Port Destination Port Gateway Queue Schedule Description * LAN net * 169.0.1.0/24 * * none * LAN net * 169.0.2.0/24 * * none * LAN net * 169.0.3.0/24 * * none
ID Proto Source Port Destination Port Gateway Queue Schedule Description * LAN net * * * * none Default allow LAN to any rule
I have a gateway group, kosh:
Group Name Gateways Priority Description kosh GW_WAN Tier 1 GW_OPT1 Tier 1 GW_OPT2 Tier 1
Name Interface Gateway Monitor IP Description GW_WAN WAN1 dynamic 24.43.32.129 Interface wan dynamic gateway GW_OPT1 WAN2 dynamic 24.43.32.129 Interface opt1 dynamic gateway GW_OPT2 WAN3 dynamic 24.43.32.129 Interface opt2 dynamic gateway
Interface Source Source Port Destination Destination Port NAT Address NAT Port Static Port Description WAN any * 169.0.1.0/24 * 169.0.1.1 * NO wan1 out WAN2 any * 169.0.2.0/24 * 169.0.2.1 * NO wan2 out WAN3 any * 169.0.3.0/24 * 169.0.3.1 * NO wan3 out WAN any * * * * * NO wan1 out default WAN2 any * * * * * NO wan2 out default WAN3 any * * * * * NO wan3 out default
-
You can't have 3 WANs with the same gateway, each gateway must be unique.
-
@cmb:
You can't have 3 WANs with the same gateway, each gateway must be unique.
While this is understandable, given it's Layer 3, but is it possible to do this on Layer 2?
I know you could try to use LAGG I suppose for connections of equal bandwidth, but doesn't 'feel right' - is there any way that apinger can be configured to be interface-centric instead of gateway-centric?
-
Its a routing problem not an apinger one.
-
@ermal:
Its a routing problem not an apinger one.
Sorry I was digressing the topic.
I was asking whether load balancing be achieved at Layer 2 (ie MAC addresses/interfaces) instead of Layer 3 (ie IP addresses and gateways), without using LAGG?
-
I was asking whether load balancing be achieved at Layer 2 (ie MAC addresses/interfaces) instead of Layer 3 (ie IP addresses and gateways), without using LAGG?
No. Since it's going to be the same MAC, it's unpredictable which interface will see it first.