Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    CARP & 3G failover

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.0-RC Snapshot Feedback and Problems - RETIRED
    3 Posts 3 Posters 2.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Z
      Zeon
      last edited by

      Hey Guys,
      I'm thinking of the following setup for production use once 2.0 is stable:

      1x incoming fibre
      2x pfsense in CARP
      2x 3g USB modem for failover

      The functionality would be that if a pfsense box failed there would be autoamtic fail across to the other as per normal for CARP. But, what if the fibre failed? Would the primary PFsense use just its 3g modem or could it be load balanced on the other CARP member and its 3g modem? I presume if the fibre and primary PFsense failed then it would fail accross to the 3g on the second CARP member?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • jimpJ
        jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
        last edited by

        It can't be load balanced in that way across CARP members.

        You also can't do proper CARP with two 3G modems in that way, since they can't share broadcast traffic or have a shared CARP IP on that interface.

        If you want to do all of that, what you could do instead is make a small "3G Router" with both of your 3G cards in it, and use that for your second WAN. You could do CARP on that new segment (WAN2 on your CARP members, LAN on the "3G Router") and let the "3G Router" do load balancing between the 3G lines. That router wouldn't itself be redundant, but since it would only be acting in a secondary WAN capacity, it may be a risk you can live with.

        Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

        Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

        Do not Chat/PM for help!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • C
          cmb
          last edited by

          You can non-statefully fail over that way, which is probably adequate. No way to retain states across 3G like that since there's no way two systems can share the same IP (aside from a separate 3G router device as Jim mentioned).

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • First post
            Last post
          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.