Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    1:1 NAT Question, port forward and outbound rule

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved NAT
    2 Posts 2 Posters 2.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • G
      grazman
      last edited by

      I have a need for 1:1 NAT using one public IP address to accept traffic on a particular port and send it internally to another port, which seems simple enough.

      I also need outbound traffic destined for a particular CIDR to use a particular public IP address.

      I see 1:1 NAT is not supported with NAT reflection. Are there any ways around this?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • GruensFroeschliG
        GruensFroeschli
        last edited by

        @grazman:

        I have a need for 1:1 NAT using one public IP address to accept traffic on a particular port and send it internally to another port, which seems simple enough.

        This is normal port forwarding and not 1:1 NAT.

        I also need outbound traffic destined for a particular CIDR to use a particular public IP address.

        I see 1:1 NAT is not supported with NAT reflection. Are there any ways around this?

        Firewall –> NAT --> outbound.
        Enable manual rule generation and you can create rules to NAT as you want.

        For reflection:
        http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Why_can%27t_I_access_forwarded_ports_on_my_WAN_IP_from_my_LAN/OPTx_networks%3F

        We do what we must, because we can.

        Asking questions the smart way: http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • First post
          Last post
        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.