Rt2860/2870 wireless support
-
If the driver uses a new name, you might need to add it to wireless_regex in /etc/inc/globals.inc.
-
@Efonne:
If the driver uses a new name, you might need to add it to wireless_regex in /etc/inc/globals.inc.
exactly. the name is rt2860
-
I mean the name of the driver, which determines what the interface will be called on the system. For example, devices using the ath driver for Atheros cards will be ath0, ath1, etc. Were you saying the driver itself is called rt2860?
Hmm, just looked at the thread you linked to. It looks like it ends up with an oddly-named device. :) I'm guessing it would be given a name that does not end in a number if it is later included in FreeBSD. Anyway, if rt2860 is the name, that is what you would add to wireless_regex.
-
yes, rt2860 is the driver's name. the devices are named rt28600, rt28601 etc…
-
nice tip (wireless_regex),
now the wirelesscard starts automatically with pfsense.
when i activate the interface, the card changes in promicous-mode, all seems good.. but in this moment i try to connect with a wlan-client a kernel panic happens.
ok it seems that isn't a real pfsense problem… got also kernel panic by activating it directly with ifconfig...
could it be because of the src and base distributions of freebsd 8.0-RELEASE?
couldn't find them for 8.0-stable...have the problem with the shell... i always have to install 1.2.2 dev to have a shell and sysinstall... then after installation sys and base for 8.0-RELEASE i upgrade to 2.0beta.. so i keep the shell and the sysinstall and have the possibility to compile the driver...
are there any better workarounds?
-
Looks like (http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=7010&page=13) that this driver is working now. Any chance it might be able to be shipped in pfsense firmware by default instead of needing to be fussed with?
-
It might be possible. I'm not sure what issues might be caused by their wacky choice of device name though.
I didn't think it was generally allowed to have a number as a part of the device name like that (when it is part of the name, and not a probed device number).
-
I would love to see this driver included in 2. The Edimax USB NIC I’m using is the only one at a decent price with a removable antenna i could find!
It would also mean i could get rid of my old 802.11g access point save some power and get better bandwidth, and all the pfsense wireless features.
Might give building the module a go on a VM and copying it over not sure if I will get very far tho! Does’ anyone have a prebuilt module for the 2870 & pfsense beta 2?
-
First you have to rename the module to not use those numbers in the name :).
-
+1 to what ermal said. They need to choose a better name for that driver, one that adheres to proper conventions for device naming, which doesn't include using numbers in the device name.
-
Ive not yet built it! Only got as far as writing the BSD 8.1 image to a USB pen drive. Work tommorow :) Thanks though will rename it if I get that far.
-
Just to elaborate: the rename involves a source code change in the driver rather than a file rename.
It may also be of interest that the FreeBSD run driver MIGHT support your device. It supports a number of the newer Ralink USB devices. See http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,27744.0.html for a little more information.
-
There isn't a build with the new kernels yet, so keep an eye out for the next new snapshot and give that a try to see if run(4) will work for you.
-
Ah changing the source code is out of my depth. I guess I will wait and hope its included.
-
any news on this one ?
2860 drivers are avaliable here:
http://repo.or.cz/w/ralink_drivers.git
-
Just curious if there are any updates?!
Gabriel
-
If it doesn't work with the run/rum drivers, it isn't likely to be in 2.0.
-
Thanks jimp and here's to hoping it will!
Gabriel
