2.0-BETA4 x86 64 BITS FULL Several problems (renamed topic due to ARCH)
-
There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:190: rule label too long (max 63 chars)
pfctl: Syntax error in config file: pf rules not loaded The line in question reads [190]: pass in quick on $OpenVPN from any to any keep state label "USER_RULE: OpenVPN Remote *************** wizard rules." -
There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:190: rule label too long (max 63 chars)
pfctl: Syntax error in config file: pf rules not loaded The line in question reads [190]: pass in quick on $OpenVPN from any to any keep state label "USER_RULE: OpenVPN Remote *************** wizard rules."This should be fixed now. OpenVPN description should have been limited to 30 chars. That is now enforced, and there is another check to prevent the rule descr from being too long as well.
-
php: /status_rrd_graph_settings.php: RRD create failed exited with 1, the error is: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/libfreetype.so.9: unsupported file layout
Did you install ntop by chance? I don't get that error on my amd64 vm on the same snapshot.
php: /status_rrd_graph_img.php: rrdcolors.inc.php for theme pfsense_ng does not exist, using defaults!
That should be fixed now
-
I feel a bit nerveous about updating beta's .. worst case: i have to drive 40 miles to the datacenter to restore it
Then you shouldn't be running a BETA there ;D
Most of the time the updates are fine, but I generally test them in a VM before putting them on a live machine.
-
jimp: when new update x64?
Is ntop now OK/working?
-
There is a snapshot building now. There was a problem with a module on x64 that was preventing it from building. It's been worked around for now.
We made a lot of changes to the nop build yesterday but I don't believe it's all correct yet. It's worth trying though.
-
Jim you are so right ;D
A know i posted a lot of garble, but what's up with the lib9.so thing? (i could just google offcourse)
M.
-
Jim you are so right ;D
A know i posted a lot of garble, but what's up with the lib9.so thing? (i could just google offcourse)
I haven't seen that before, which is why I asked if you had installed packages. The error message might imply that the library is the wrong format (e.g. 32-bit library when it expects 64-bit)
-
MMmhhh, that does give me hope. I'll look into it some more and will post my findings.
-
Unable to communicate with www.pfsense.com. Please verify DNS and interface configuration, and that pfSense has functional Internet connectivity. DNS is OK and interet is working. What is the problem.
i have:
2.0-BETA4 (amd64)
built on Fri Aug 27 01:09:19 UTC 2010
FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASEYou are on the latest version.
-
Jim,
Just upgraded to 2.0-BETA4 (amd64) built on Mon Aug 30 05:08:19 UTC 2010
FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE #1: Mon Aug 30 04:56:22 UTC 2010 sullrich@FreeBSD_8.0_pfSense_2.0-AMD64.snaps.pfsense.org:/usr/obj.pfSense/usr/pfSensesrc/src/sys/pfSense.8 amd64I am happy to report that:
- RRD works again
- Open VPN seems to work again
- Loadbalancer seems to work (didn't start …)
