Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Verizon FIOS setup - advice needed!

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    18 Posts 5 Posters 8.1k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • M
      mhab12
      last edited by

      Is there any specific reason you still need your ActionTech router?  PfSense will do almost anything you can think of - especially in a simple setup like yours.  Do you need it for wireless?  Do you need to use it as your switch?  If either of these are true then disable DHCP on the ActionTech and do not use its WAN port.  Also, change the ActionTech IP to be something other than 192.168.1.1.  Use this IP for PfSense and make the ActionTech something like 192.168.1.2 if you still need to use it as an AP.  If you have a regular switch and don't need wireless, this all becomes a lot easier.

      Try setting up as follows:
      Fios->PfSense WAN interface
      PfSense LAN interface (DHCP enabled) to ActionTech LAN1 interface
      PC1 to ActionTech LAN2

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J
        jasonlitka
        last edited by

        He would need the Actiontec for the following reasons:

        • Newer (last 3 years) FiOS internet installs come in over coax using MoCA so the installers don't have to run coax for TV & cat5 for internet
        • Verizon STBs use IP & MoCA for VoD.

        If the feed comes in over cat5 then you can use pfSense as your WAN router, hook up a coax feed to your actiontec, hook up a LAN port on the actiontec (disable DHCP) to your LAN side of pfSense, and then leave the WAN side of the actiontec unhooked.  Alternatively, use a NIM in place of the actiontec.

        If your internet comes in over coax AND you have TV service then the install of pfSense gets a bit trickier.  There's a pretty good thread over at DSL reports on how to do it.

        I can break anything.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • B
          bhuwan
          last edited by

          @mhab12:

          Is there any specific reason you still need your ActionTech router?  PfSense will do almost anything you can think of - especially in a simple setup like yours.  Do you need it for wireless?  Do you need to use it as your switch?  If either of these are true then disable DHCP on the ActionTech and do not use its WAN port.  Also, change the ActionTech IP to be something other than 192.168.1.1.  Use this IP for PfSense and make the ActionTech something like 192.168.1.2 if you still need to use it as an AP.  If you have a regular switch and don't need wireless, this all becomes a lot easier.

          Try setting up as follows:
          Fios->PfSense WAN interface
          PfSense LAN interface (DHCP enabled) to ActionTech LAN1 interface
          PC1 to ActionTech LAN2

          The ActionTec router is required as it as a newer install and thus over MoCA (as opposed to ethernet).
          So it has to be
          FiOS -> ONT -> ActionTec (Over MoCA) –------------------> pfSense ------------------->  PC1
                                               (LAN OUTPUT)            (WAN input)                    (LAN Output)

          I could make the ActionTec a bridge and make pFsense the DHCP Server.

          Also, I DO NOT have FiOS TV and thus DO NOT care about Widgets, VOD, etc.
          P.S. my network is a lot more complicated than this.  I've dumb'd it down to make it easier to understand

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • B
            bhuwan
            last edited by

            @jasonlitka:

            He would need the Actiontec for the following reasons:

            • Newer (last 3 years) FiOS internet installs come in over coax using MoCA so the installers don't have to run coax for TV & cat5 for internet
            • Verizon STBs use IP & MoCA for VoD.

            If the feed comes in over cat5 then you can use pfSense as your WAN router, hook up a coax feed to your actiontec, hook up a LAN port on the actiontec (disable DHCP) to your LAN side of pfSense, and then leave the WAN side of the actiontec unhooked.  Alternatively, use a NIM in place of the actiontec.

            If your internet comes in over coax AND you have TV service then the install of pfSense gets a bit trickier.  There's a pretty good thread over at DSL reports on how to do it.

            The comment you made (I've made it BOLD) is interesting.  Will this actually work? Basically you are saying…

            FiOS --> ONT --> CAT5e --> pFSense (WAN) --> pfSense (LAN OUT) --> ActionTec LAN (DHCP Disabled)

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • D
              danswartz
              last edited by

              I have pfsense on FIOS.  If you are not using their TV, have VZ switch the ONT from COAX (MOCA) to CAT5 and just throw the AT in the rubbish.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • D
                dreamslacker
                last edited by

                @bhuwan:

                @jasonlitka:

                He would need the Actiontec for the following reasons:

                • Newer (last 3 years) FiOS internet installs come in over coax using MoCA so the installers don't have to run coax for TV & cat5 for internet
                • Verizon STBs use IP & MoCA for VoD.

                If the feed comes in over cat5 then you can use pfSense as your WAN router, hook up a coax feed to your actiontec, hook up a LAN port on the actiontec (disable DHCP) to your LAN side of pfSense, and then leave the WAN side of the actiontec unhooked.  Alternatively, use a NIM in place of the actiontec.

                If your internet comes in over coax AND you have TV service then the install of pfSense gets a bit trickier.  There's a pretty good thread over at DSL reports on how to do it.

                The comment you made (I've made it BOLD) is interesting.  Will this actually work? Basically you are saying…

                FiOS --> ONT --> CAT5e --> pFSense (WAN) --> pfSense (LAN OUT) --> ActionTec LAN (DHCP Disabled)

                Yes, it will work except that you don't need the ActionTec router at all.  You do however, need a means to convert the Fibre optic connection to Ethernet whether via modem (if Verizon wants to lock in the connection to accept only the modem's 'MAC ID') or transceiver module.

                Next generation broadband is being deployed over here in Singapore and the similar setups are being offered by the ISPs.  The network infrastructure provider will lay one fibre-optic connection with ONT free of charge (technically not free since the government paid of the project with tax monies) in every apartment/ house.
                One common method offered by ISPs is MoCA for houses that are not network ready because the ONT might not be located near the computers/ routers whereas nearly all houses are CaTV ready.

                For those of us with ready networks, we can lease a Huawei/ Ericsson modem and use them with our own routers.  The optic line is locked to the modem's ID so that optic ready houses cannot leech/ disrupt the connection without a ready plan (not unlike how cable connections are locked with modem HFC MAC ID).

                You need only request Verizon to do the same by providing/ leasing a FibreOptic modem instead of the MoCA device.  You would then hook up the pfsense box to the modem just like how a Cable Modem connection works.  You would then set the pfsense WAN to DHCP (or static if one is provided) and use the pfsense as a NAT router.
                i.e.
                FTTP -> ONT -> Modem -> pfsense router -> LAN

                As another user as stated, you can request for CAT 5e termination instead.  In this case, the modem/ transceiver and beyond would be outside of your premises.  You'll then connect the router directly into the wall socket.  The ActionTec would be hooked up your network via its LAN port to provide CaTV services (similar to hacking a wireless router into an AP).

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • D
                  danswartz
                  last edited by

                  I would be very surprised if verizon would agree to any non-standard HW in place of the ONT.  Also, as the OP said, he doesn't have TV, so I can't imagine how anything other than switching to cat5 and pitching the AT makes any sense.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • D
                    dreamslacker
                    last edited by

                    @danswartz:

                    I would be very surprised if verizon would agree to any non-standard HW in place of the ONT.  Also, as the OP said, he doesn't have TV, so I can't imagine how anything other than switching to cat5 and pitching the AT makes any sense.

                    Works the same then (Optic -> Eth bridge is effectively an optic modem).
                    Over here, the ONT is little more than a SC junction box coupled with a Huawei modem (Huawei MoCA capable router for those that subscribe to IPTV/ VOIP services).  At stock, without any internet plans, we just get the SC junction box.
                    I've hooked up with the ISP (friend's company) to throw in a Cisco 891 running a PPTP to their routing core for a static block of IPs though.  Now just waiting for the infrastructure provider to run the optic into my home.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • D
                      danswartz
                      last edited by

                      First of all, it isn't just an optical modem - the ONT involves POTS telephone support as well as TV.  Unless you have specific technical knowledge you haven't cited, I wouldn't make suggestions like this which are likely to be a dead end for the OP.  I think I wasn't clear: my point was that I can almost guarantee verizon is not going to do something non-standard like this, but for policy reasons, not technical reasons.  Let some customer hook up non-verizon approved HW to their fiber-optic network?  Not likely, IMO.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • D
                        dreamslacker
                        last edited by

                        Yes, I understand it's not just a modem.  However, I fail to see why the OP cannot request that they (Verizon) provides the WAN IP off the CAT 5e link (since you stated that it is possible to request for this arrangement) instead of having an additional router tap the Coax and NAT route.

                        Over here, we use a Huawei which provides POTS and CaTV when these services are subscribed to.  This is used to provide CaTV and POTS through the premises internal wiring.
                        Another Huawei unit is used to tap the internal CaTV wiring in the premises to provide an Eth. connection for devices.
                        The main difference is that we have the option, to request for Eth to be provided instead for network ready homes.  And a Huawei device (similar to the actiontek) can tap the network to provide the POTS/ CaTV service.  The router is provided by the customer in this instance.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • D
                          danswartz
                          last edited by

                          I don't know if we are having a language issue here?  What you are saying about requesting WAN via the CAT5 link is exactly what I was suggesting - my quibble was about my understanding that you are suggesting an alternative involving some non-standard fiber-optic HW to replace the ONT.  If that isn't what you meant, what did you mean? :(

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • D
                            dreamslacker
                            last edited by

                            @danswartz:

                            I don't know if we are having a language issue here?  What you are saying about requesting WAN via the CAT5 link is exactly what I was suggesting - my quibble was about my understanding that you are suggesting an alternative involving some non-standard fiber-optic HW to replace the ONT.  If that isn't what you meant, what did you mean? :(

                            Communication issue, yes.  I meant requesting that Verizon provides the modem if it is possible.  In this case, the modem would obviously be approved h/w.
                            Evidently, we have very different definitions of an ONT.  Over here, the ONT is just a SC junction box and a separate modem (upon specific request, we can use a media converter instead) would tap this for an Eth connection.
                            In the event that TV and voice services are required, this would be a Huawei device that provides CaTV and POTS in addition to a Cat 5 link.
                            It seems that on your side of the pond, the ONT is an entire box which encompasses all of these.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • D
                              danswartz
                              last edited by

                              The verizon ONT is not just a modem - as I said, it provides telephone service, TV service and internet access, including special support for video on demand streamed over the internet.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • D
                                dreamslacker
                                last edited by

                                @danswartz:

                                The verizon ONT is not just a modem - as I said, it provides telephone service, TV service and internet access, including special support for video on demand streamed over the internet.

                                Would 'media converter' be acceptable then?  I can't think of any other terms.  What I meant was to request for a 'media converter' that specifically delivers the data communications over Cat 5 rather than Coax.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • D
                                  danswartz
                                  last edited by

                                  I am not being clear, I guess :(  Verizon is a large company.  They have certain equipment (various makes of ONT) which are what they put at customer sites.  If you ask them to put some other item in (why, what is it doing the ONT is not doing?) they are going to say no.  What is wrong with calling them and saying "please switch the internet access from COAX to CAT5".  Done.  Free.  What problem are you trying to solve here?

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • D
                                    dreamslacker
                                    last edited by

                                    You gave me the impression that the ONT in question doesn't serve out CAT 5e.  ;D

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • D
                                      danswartz
                                      last edited by

                                      I suggest you work on your reading comprehension, then.  Here was my first reply on this: "I have pfsense on FIOS.  If you are not using their TV, have VZ switch the ONT from COAX (MOCA) to CAT5 and just throw the AT in the rubbish."  How that gave you the impression the ONT wouldn't do this is beyond me.  I am done with this thread :(

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.