Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    NAT with Pfsense 2.0Beta4

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.0-RC Snapshot Feedback and Problems - RETIRED
    21 Posts 9 Posters 8.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • F
      f0dei
      last edited by

      It's a linked rules on NAT side, pfSense create WAN rules alone.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • C
        cmb
        last edited by

        @wallabybob:

        Are firewall rules applied BEFORE port forwarding or AFTER?

        after.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • F
          f0dei
          last edited by

          Any others ideas ?
          I make a tcpdump and the udp packet from Internet seems
          to go correctly to my opt1 interface but a always can't connect.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • L
            Lloyd
            last edited by

            I have the same issue. I have NATing an RDP port through (port 3389).

            When I log a 'pass' firewall rule it shows a success however the connection is not made. It is almost like the routing of the reply packets is not working properly.

            My outbound firewall rules are allowing everything currently so I think that the firewall is not the issue.

            • Lloyd
            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • F
              f0dei
              last edited by

              @Lloyd:

              My outbound firewall rules are allowing everything currently so I think that the firewall is not the issue.

              • Lloyd

              It's very strange, If I put my server on my modem and put the sames rules in their firewall as above, the connection is possible.
              The problem comes for sure from pfSense box, but where that is the question.

              With pfSense box, I make a tcpdump on my wan and server networks cards.

              When I initiat a connection, I see the outgoing packet on UDP 30001  :)
              The reply  from internet comes also on UDP 30001 and goes to my server IP but connection is not possible  ???  ???

              I don't want to switch to monowall or similar firewalls. I trying to resolve this problem since 3 weeks and finally decided
              to ask for helps on this forum.

              I am sure, a lot "supers" users of pfSense could be resolve our problem.
              Regards
              Touf

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • B
                biatche
                last edited by

                i can confirm something is not right about multi wan NAT

                opt1.modem.ip=192.168.202.1 [modem dmz set to 192.168.202.254]
                opt1.interface.ip=192.168.202.254

                i setup this NAT rule: OPT1  TCP/UDP  *  *  OPT1 address  26001  192.168.0.11  26001

                utorrent is on 26001.

                went to http://www.yougetsignal.com/tools/open-ports/ to do a port test. says port is closed.

                hooked up a test pc and attached modem directly to pc. loaded up utorrent. did port test. says port is open.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • T
                  tacfit
                  last edited by

                  I'm seeing the same thing on releases since late October. NAT is working fine on my default gateway, but not on any of the OPT interfaces. So Multi-WAN NAT seems a bit busted at present.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • S
                    sullrich
                    last edited by

                    This was fixed yesterday.  Try todays snapshot.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • P
                      Phobia
                      last edited by

                      Hey there,

                      I'm running :

                      2.0-BETA4 (i386)
                      built on Wed Nov 3 02:54:06 EDT 2010
                      FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p1

                      … and can confirm that my NAT issues related to this issue appear to have been resolved.

                      Also, the rule I have on each WAN interface allowing SSH access on a non-standard port (not NAT - just a straight forward PASS rule) is also now working.

                      -- Phob

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • B
                        biatche
                        last edited by

                        2.0-BETA4 (i386)
                        built on Wed Nov 3 02:54:06 EDT 2010
                        FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p1

                        updated to the above. same problem. fine on WAN1, not OPT1 - same nat/rules rules.
                        how can i diagnose this?

                        [2.0-BETA4][root@rixgate.rix]/root(8): tcpdump -i em0 tcp port 26066
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
listening on em0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes
09:33:23.778426 IP www.no-ip.com.40436 > 192.168.0.11.26066: Flags [s], seq 1401554251, win 5840, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 409248447 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0
09:33:23.778528 IP 192.168.0.11.26066 > www.no-ip.com.40436: Flags [S.], seq 573006331, ack 1401554252, win 8192, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 52097064 ecr 409248447], length 0
09:33:24.453092 IP 192.168.0.11.26066 > www.no-ip.com.40318: Flags [R], seq 208309969, win 0, length 0
09:33:26.776633 IP www.no-ip.com.40436 > 192.168.0.11.26066: Flags [s], seq 1401554251, win 5840, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 409251447 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0
09:33:26.779519 IP 192.168.0.11.26066 > www.no-ip.com.40436: Flags [S.], seq 573006331, ack 1401554252, win 8192, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 52097364 ecr 409248447], length 0
09:33:32.780504 IP 192.168.0.11.26066 > www.no-ip.com.40436: Flags [S.], seq 573006331, ack 1401554252, win 8192, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 52097964 ecr 409248447], length 0
^C
6 packets captured
1634 packets received by filter
0 packets dropped by kernel
[2.0-BETA4][root@rixgate.rix]/root(9): tcpdump -i nfe1 tcp port 26066    
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
listening on nfe1, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes
09:33:49.843386 IP www.no-ip.com.40576 > 192.168.202.254.26066: Flags [s], seq 1422382543, win 5840, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 409274479 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0
09:33:52.895297 IP www.no-ip.com.40576 > 192.168.202.254.26066: Flags [s], seq 1422382543, win 5840, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 409277479 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0
^C
2 packets captured
1554 packets received by filter
0 packets dropped by kernel
[2.0-BETA4][root@rixgate.rix]/root(10): 

em0 = lan
nfe1 = opt1

so...the server received and responded but response never arrived on opt1\. why? what have i missed?

[code]
Port forward rule:
OPT1   	 TCP  	 *  	 *  	 OPT1 address  	 26066  	 192.168.0.11  	 26066

Outbound rule:
OPT1    	 192.168.0.0/24  	 *  	 *  	 *  	 *  	 *  	YES	LAN to OPT1  

FW rule:
TCP  	 *  	 *  	 192.168.0.11  	 26066  	 *  	 none
[/code][/s][/s][/s][/s]
                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • T
                          tacfit
                          last edited by

                          Working for me too. Thanks a lot Scott!

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • K
                            kazibole
                            last edited by

                            I'm having an issue with NAT, not sure if it is the same one as the people here. I am running the latest snapshot:

                            2.0-BETA4 (i386)
                            built on Thu Nov 4 01:22:43 EDT 2010
                            FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p1

                            I've got one WAN interface and 3 LAN interfaces. I set up two NAT rules with Pass as the option. One for SIP (UDP 5060) and one for RTP (UDP 10000 - 20000). One issue is that when I do a packet capture on my WAN interface, I can see RTP packets in the range 10000-20000 come in, but when I do another capture on the LAN interface, I don't see them forwarded to my host. I am also having intermittent issues with the SIP port not always registering. Haven't dug too deep on this one, but I suspect that not all packets are getting forwarded to my host.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • B
                              biatche
                              last edited by

                              I don't fully get.. does sound similar to mine…

                              (public initiates) [modem] -> [opt1] -> [lan] all ok!
                              [lan] (packet received and responses fine) -> [opt1] (!! never received outgoing packet from lan.) -> [modem]

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • F
                                f0dei
                                last edited by

                                Hi,

                                On my side with 2.0-BETA4 (i386) built on Wed Nov 3 02:54:06 EDT 2010 Can connect now but not every time.
                                Since this update it work better than previous version but not every time  ???

                                Always OK if I use only modem without pfSense.

                                This night I have instaled monowall to check if it working or not and make few test, now I can connect to my server.
                                Something is broken in pfSense. I test the NAT and port forward and it's not working on my side (with v 1.23 and latest v2)

                                All work great with monowall if I put the same rules

                                I hope this problem will be resolved in future releases (I like pfSense)

                                Cheers

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • B
                                  biatche
                                  last edited by

                                  Can anybody confirm these issues or if I'm doing something wrong? I really wanna stay on pfsense and not move to anything else….

                                  i need NAT on opt1 :(

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.