Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    How to achieve more than 253 lan ip addresses ?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved DHCP and DNS
    8 Posts 6 Posters 4.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • B
      byrnie
      last edited by

      Hi Everyone

      Apologies if i have posted this in the wrong section,

      I have setup a pfsense server in a student village with 3 nic cards, 2 x wan load balancing, 1 x lan with Dhcp,Dns,Proxy and captive portal and it works fantastic better than expected and the student village is a non-profit for the benifit of the students so the cost was brilliant this year has seen a spike in students not been able to afford accommodation and thus the village has taken on more apartments in the complex under a government grant scheme

      This will bring the total head count form 220 to 340 thus leads me to my question

      How to achieve more than 253 lan ip addresses ?

      Could i create a second ip range on the lan nic card or would i need another lan nic card for new range and how would the dhcp handle this well

      at the moment i have to many theory's and would like another perspective

      Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • S
        Supermule Banned
        last edited by

        http://techrepublic.com.com/i/tr/downloads/images/subnetting/subnetting_c.png

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • C
          cmb
          last edited by

          @Supermule:

          http://techrepublic.com.com/i/tr/downloads/images/subnetting/subnetting_c.png

          That.  use a bigger LAN subnet. Or segregate the network into multiple networks with VLANs or separate physical interfaces. In this kind of scenario, the bigger LAN subnet is likely fine. In a corporate network I would segregate it.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • B
            byrnie
            last edited by

            Thank you both so much never expected such prompt replies

            I read up on subnets and understand the concept now.
            Today i changed the bit count from 24 to 19 on the static lan address and it has allowed me from 192.168.0.0 to 192.168.31.255 which is more than ample

            Such a simple solutions for what i thought would be a complex problem it shows how helpful and knowledgeable ye guys and girls are on this forum

            I have one more question i have 3 computers i need to set on static mapping in the dhcp server but when i try to apply the static maps i get the follwing error message

            The following input errors were detected:

            * 192.168.1.234 is inside the range you specified.
                * 192.168.1.237 is inside the range you specified.
                * 192.168.1.238 is inside the range you specified.

            Its seems odd thats its telling me that they are inside the range so i can not understand the nature of the error

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • K
              kpa
              last edited by

              If possible, change the address range from 192.168.0.0/19  to 10.n.0.0/19 where n is some random number 0-255. The 192.168.. addresses may cause problems in the future if you decide to allow vpn access to your network and the vpn clients happen to be in a network that uses 192.168.. addresses. The 10...* addresses are less used in home routers so they have lesser chance of address conflicts.

              I think static dhcp mappings have to use an address that is outside of the dynamic range.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • W
                wallabybob
                last edited by

                @kpa:

                I think static dhcp mappings have to use an address that is outside of the dynamic range.

                Correct. In DHCP server configuration the "range" really means range of addresses for dynamic address assignment. Static addresses need to come outside that range.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • jimpJ
                  jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                  last edited by

                  Just in case you wonder why the DHCP addresses must come outside of that range, the answer is here:

                  http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Why_can%27t_I_have_static_mappings_inside_my_DHCP_range%3F

                  Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                  Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                  Do not Chat/PM for help!

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • B
                    byrnie
                    last edited by

                    sorry for the delay in writing back

                    Ye hit the nail on the head i removed 50 address at the start of the range and can now use them for static addresses

                    Thanks a million for all ye're help

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.