Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    DNSSEC on pfSense

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.0-RC Snapshot Feedback and Problems - RETIRED
    178 Posts 18 Posters 71.2k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J
      jlepthien
      last edited by

      @johnpoz:

      I just tried putting in a domain override, and restarted unbound - and its not showing up in the unbound config.

      Domain overrides

      Remote Control Config

      So I have the below domain set to override and use 192.168.1.4, I even stopped and restarted unbound service - just not showing up in the config??

      But to your question, for a host to resolve with your domain .ip the nameserver you point to for .ip would have to have that host record.

      For me it shows up in the config. And it hasn't to be the hostname, just the domain. That way it works with dnsmasq. Try just setting the domain there.

      | apple fanboy | music lover | network and security specialist | in love with cisco systems |

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • johnpozJ
        johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
        last edited by

        What modem you have?  When I do a search for speedport.ip I see stuff about this modem

        Speedport W 701V

        Thanks just your modem resolving to itself is all, thats not what you would do to if you want unbound to resolve speedport.ip to the 192.168.2.1 address of your modem.

        From the manual of that modem, its in german but translates too

        Type in the address bar of Internet browsing, "speedport.ip" or "192.168.2.1"and confirm.

        This just means that if using your modem (really a router) as your dns, that would resolve speedport.ip to itself.  And then would work if you were forwarding dns to the router, ie 192.168.2.1 – but with unbound its doing the actual dns lookups, speedport.ip is never going to resolve in the real world.. You would have to have a dns server that thinks owner of the .ip tld and then a A record for speedport in it.

        If you want to resolve speedport.ip using unbound, just add a host record for that, and then it will resolve it to whatever IP you want.

        so for example. I add it in mine to speedport.ip to 192.168.2.1

        As you can see from the attachments -- but even with restart its not reading that entry in??  but it has all my other entries??  Im not on the current snap - but don't want to upgrade while not there.. So will have to do when I get back.. But that is what take your problem is for this speedport.ip.

        It resolves my other local hosts just fine
        ;; QUESTION SECTION:
        ;quad-w7.local.lan.            IN      A

        ;; ANSWER SECTION:
        quad-w7.local.lan.      3600    IN      A      192.168.1.100

        ;; Query time: 4 msec
        ;; SERVER: 192.168.1.253#53(192.168.1.253)
        ;; WHEN: Mon Jan 10 15:44:50 2011
        ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 51

        But his new one I just added for speedport.ip its not??

        ;; QUESTION SECTION:
        ;speedport.ip.                  IN      A

        ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
        .                      86400  IN      SOA    a.root-servers.net. nstld.verisi        gn-grs.com. 2011011000 1800 900 604800 86400

        ;; Query time: 52 msec
        ;; SERVER: 192.168.1.253#53(192.168.1.253)
        ;; WHEN: Mon Jan 10 15:44:37 2011
        ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 105

        When I look at the status tab is not showing that new entry, even upon start and stop of unbound service..  Will update the snap when I get home and see if that fixes it, currently on
        2.0-BETA5 (i386)
        built on Sat Jan 8 01:01:27 EST 2011

        edithost.jpg
        edithost.jpg_thumb
        myhosts.jpg
        myhosts.jpg_thumb

        An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
        If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
        Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
        SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J
          jlepthien
          last edited by

          Yeah okay. But I wanted to add that whole .ip domain so I added a whole domain overwrite, not just for the host…

          | apple fanboy | music lover | network and security specialist | in love with cisco systems |

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • johnpozJ
            johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
            last edited by

            If you want that resolve whole .ip domain – then you need another nameserver that would be authoritative for the .ip tld -- and this nameserver would have to house all the records of hosts in that domain.

            example

            speedport.ip
            hostA.ip
            hostB.ip
            etc..

            So does your modem at 2.1 allow you to put in other hosts that would resolve to with .ip domain?

            A domain override would be used if you want to have some other nameserver resolve for say yourdomain.com vs root servers point to for example.  Or you have some nameserver that is authoritative for an invalid tld like .ip

            An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
            If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
            Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
            SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J
              jlepthien
              last edited by

              I know. The point is that it works that way with dnsmasq so why not now with Unbound?

              | apple fanboy | music lover | network and security specialist | in love with cisco systems |

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • J
                jlepthien
                last edited by

                Ok now I changed it the way you used it and it works…

                | apple fanboy | music lover | network and security specialist | in love with cisco systems |

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • johnpozJ
                  johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                  last edited by

                  Because to be honest I doubt that speedport router is actually a nameserver that would resolve speedport.ip like a normal nameserver would

                  Simple enough to test, using either nslookup or dig – do a query to that ip 192.168.2.1

                  nslookup

                  server 192.168.2.1
                  speedport.ip

                  does that work?  I doubt it

                  Or with dig

                  dig @192.168.2.1 speedport.ip

                  If those work then your domain override should work, if not then no it would never work.  So just having your unbound resolve speedport.ip to whatever IP you want is the way to do it.

                  Now currently mine does not seem to be reading in the additions I make to either hosts or domain overrides - but once it does, then I will point it to my other nameserver and verify it works like it should.  But for now, if you don't mine do either the nslookup or dig test and post the results.. If that works then your right the override for .ip to go ask 192.168.2.1 should resolve speedport.ip for you.

                  An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                  If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                  Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                  SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • T
                    ToxIcon
                    last edited by

                    wagonza

                    I tried with forwarding enabled and disable and both times lost connection
                    internally but the pfsense still can reach the outside, I test it by updating
                    snort and squidguard but the systems behind pfsense cannot reach the internet.

                    here are the logs

                    $ dig zone @192.168.2.9

                    ; <<>> DiG 9.6.2-P2 <<>> zone @192.168.2.9
                    ;; global options: +cmd
                    ;; Got answer:
                    ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 1390
                    ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0

                    ;; QUESTION SECTION:
                    ;zone. IN A

                    ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
                    . 86400 IN SOA a.root-servers.net. nstld.verisign-grs.com. 2011011000 1800 900 604800 86400

                    ;; Query time: 81 msec
                    ;; SERVER: 192.168.2.9#53(192.168.2.9)
                    ;; WHEN: Mon Jan 10 21:26:00 2011
                    ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 97

                    $ dig @192.168.2.9 www.pfsense.org

                    ; <<>> DiG 9.6.2-P2 <<>> @192.168.2.9 www.pfsense.org
                    ; (1 server found)
                    ;; global options: +cmd
                    ;; Got answer:
                    ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 3625
                    ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 0

                    ;; QUESTION SECTION:
                    ;www.pfsense.org. IN A

                    ;; ANSWER SECTION:
                    www.pfsense.org. 3600 IN CNAME pfsense.org.
                    pfsense.org. 3600 IN A 69.64.6.21

                    ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
                    pfsense.org. 3600 IN NS ns17.domaincontrol.com.
                    pfsense.org. 3600 IN NS ns18.domaincontrol.com.

                    ;; Query time: 177 msec
                    ;; SERVER: 192.168.2.9#53(192.168.2.9)
                    ;; WHEN: Mon Jan 10 21:22:18 2011
                    ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 118

                    clog.txt

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • johnpozJ
                      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                      last edited by

                      OK so I updated my snap, and now its showing my domain overrides.

                      Domain overrides

                      stub-zone:
                      name: "test.ip"
                      stub-addr: 192.168.1.4
                      stub-prime: no

                      But I agree its not working like it should.. So there is a server at 192.168.1.4 running bind with a zone for test.ip

                      see – if I query it directly authoritative for the host3 record I created.


                      ; <<>> DiG 9.7.2-P3 <<>> @192.168.1.4 host3.test.ip
                      ; (1 server found)
                      ;; global options: +cmd
                      ;; Got answer:
                      ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 15037
                      ;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 1

                      ;; QUESTION SECTION:
                      ;host3.test.ip.                 IN      A

                      ;; ANSWER SECTION:
                      host3.test.ip.          21600   IN      A       192.168.1.101

                      ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
                      test.ip.                21600   IN      NS      p4-28g.local.lan.

                      ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
                      p4-28g.local.lan.       21600   IN      A       192.168.1.4

                      ;; Query time: 5 msec
                      ;; SERVER: 192.168.1.4#53(192.168.1.4)
                      ;; WHEN: Mon Jan 10 23:32:39 2011
                      ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 93


                      Now if I ask the pfsense box that has an override set to ask 192.168.1.4 for the domain test.ip it also gives me back servfail


                      ; <<>> DiG 9.7.2-P3 <<>> @192.168.1.253 host3.test.ip
                      ; (1 server found)
                      ;; global options: +cmd
                      ;; Got answer:
                      ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 49426
                      ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0

                      ;; QUESTION SECTION:
                      ;host3.test.ip.                 IN      A

                      ;; Query time: 11 msec
                      ;; SERVER: 192.168.1.253#53(192.168.1.253)
                      ;; WHEN: Mon Jan 10 23:40:03 2011
                      ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 31


                      So seems domain override is not working??

                      Currently running
                      2.0-BETA5 (i386)
                      built on Mon Jan 10 13:14:45 EST 2011

                      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • S
                        serangku
                        last edited by

                        hey … something error on unbound packages when updated to latest pf20 i386

                        Jan 11 14:10:09 php: /pkg_edit.php: The command '/usr/local/sbin/unbound-control start' returned exit code '1', the output was '[1294729809] unbound[8280:0] error: unknown size specifier: '-1m' /usr/local/etc/unbound/unbound.conf:17: error: buffer size expected read /usr/local/etc/unbound/unbound.conf failed: 1 errors in configuration file [1294729809] unbound[8280:0] fatal error: Could not read config file: /usr/local/etc/unbound/unbound.conf'

                        somethink error on pfsense or unbound it self ?
                        back again to dnsmasq

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • W
                          wagonza
                          last edited by

                          @ToxIcon:

                          $ dig @192.168.2.9 www.pfsense.org

                          ;; QUESTION SECTION:
                          ;www.pfsense.org. IN A

                          ;; ANSWER SECTION:
                          www.pfsense.org. 3600 IN CNAME pfsense.org.
                          pfsense.org. 3600 IN A 69.64.6.21

                          ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
                          pfsense.org. 3600 IN NS ns17.domaincontrol.com.
                          pfsense.org. 3600 IN NS ns18.domaincontrol.com.

                          This shows that it is answering correctly unless www.pfsense.org was cached. Trying another website not resolved yet something like www.food.com?

                          Follow me on twitter http://twitter.com/wagonza
                          http://www.thepackethub.co.za

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • W
                            wagonza
                            last edited by

                            @jlepthien:

                            Yeah okay. But I wanted to add that whole .ip domain so I added a whole domain overwrite, not just for the host…

                            Yeah I hear what you saying. Your modem would have to be running its own name server as @johnpoz mentioned.

                            Follow me on twitter http://twitter.com/wagonza
                            http://www.thepackethub.co.za

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • W
                              wagonza
                              last edited by

                              @serangku:

                              hey … something error on unbound packages when updated to latest pf20 i386

                              Jan 11 14:10:09 php: /pkg_edit.php: The command '/usr/local/sbin/unbound-control start' returned exit code '1', the output was '[1294729809] unbound[8280:0] error: unknown size specifier: '-1m' /usr/local/etc/unbound/unbound.conf:17: error: buffer size expected read /usr/local/etc/unbound/unbound.conf failed: 1 errors in configuration file [1294729809] unbound[8280:0] fatal error: Could not read config file: /usr/local/etc/unbound/unbound.conf'

                              somethink error on pfsense or unbound it self ?
                              back again to dnsmasq

                              What is kern.ipc.maxsockbuf set to on your pfSense box (sysctl kern.ipc.maxsockbuf)?

                              I have committed a fix for this but still interested to know what your kern.ipc.maxsockbuf is set to.

                              Follow me on twitter http://twitter.com/wagonza
                              http://www.thepackethub.co.za

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • W
                                wagonza
                                last edited by

                                @johnpoz:

                                OK so I updated my snap, and now its showing my domain overrides.

                                Domain overrides

                                stub-zone:
                                name: "test.ip"
                                stub-addr: 192.168.1.4
                                stub-prime: no

                                But I agree its not working like it should.. So there is a server at 192.168.1.4 running bind with a zone for test.ip

                                see – if I query it directly authoritative for the host3 record I created.


                                ; <<>> DiG 9.7.2-P3 <<>> @192.168.1.4 host3.test.ip
                                ; (1 server found)
                                ;; global options: +cmd
                                ;; Got answer:
                                ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 15037
                                ;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 1

                                ;; QUESTION SECTION:
                                ;host3.test.ip.                 IN      A

                                ;; ANSWER SECTION:
                                host3.test.ip.          21600   IN      A       192.168.1.101

                                ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
                                test.ip.                21600   IN      NS      p4-28g.local.lan.

                                ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
                                p4-28g.local.lan.       21600   IN      A       192.168.1.4

                                ;; Query time: 5 msec
                                ;; SERVER: 192.168.1.4#53(192.168.1.4)
                                ;; WHEN: Mon Jan 10 23:32:39 2011
                                ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 93


                                Now if I ask the pfsense box that has an override set to ask 192.168.1.4 for the domain test.ip it also gives me back servfail


                                ; <<>> DiG 9.7.2-P3 <<>> @192.168.1.253 host3.test.ip
                                ; (1 server found)
                                ;; global options: +cmd
                                ;; Got answer:
                                ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 49426
                                ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0

                                ;; QUESTION SECTION:
                                ;host3.test.ip.                 IN      A

                                ;; Query time: 11 msec
                                ;; SERVER: 192.168.1.253#53(192.168.1.253)
                                ;; WHEN: Mon Jan 10 23:40:03 2011
                                ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 31


                                So seems domain override is not working??

                                Currently running
                                2.0-BETA5 (i386)
                                built on Mon Jan 10 13:14:45 EST 2011

                                Do you have "Private Address support" disabled?

                                Follow me on twitter http://twitter.com/wagonza
                                http://www.thepackethub.co.za

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • johnpozJ
                                  johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                                  last edited by

                                  No it needs to be enabled for host and domain override to work.. You can see from previous posts that host override works.. ie
                                  From the settings page
                                  Note: Domain Overrides and Host entries will be allowed to return answers if this option is enabled.

                                  See local overrides work just fine..

                                  ;; QUESTION SECTION:
                                  ;qs108t.local.lan.              IN      A

                                  ;; ANSWER SECTION:
                                  qs108t.local.lan.       3600    IN      A       192.168.1.128

                                  ;; Query time: 8 msec
                                  ;; SERVER: 192.168.1.253#53(192.168.1.253)
                                  ;; WHEN: Tue Jan 11 07:59:11 2011
                                  ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 50

                                  ;; QUESTION SECTION:
                                  ;p4-28g.local.lan.              IN      A

                                  ;; ANSWER SECTION:
                                  p4-28g.local.lan.       3600    IN      A       192.168.1.4

                                  ;; Query time: 7 msec
                                  ;; SERVER: 192.168.1.253#53(192.168.1.253)
                                  ;; WHEN: Tue Jan 11 07:59:49 2011
                                  ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 50

                                  but now I have a domain override set, shows up in the unbound config, the server it points to at 192.168.1.4 is running bind, clearly answers for that zone test.ip, but when you ask the pfsense box running unbound you get servfail?

                                  ;; QUESTION SECTION:
                                  ;host2.test.ip.                 IN      A

                                  ;; ANSWER SECTION:
                                  host2.test.ip.          21600   IN      A       192.168.1.100

                                  ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
                                  test.ip.                21600   IN      NS      p4-28g.local.lan.

                                  ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
                                  p4-28g.local.lan.       21600   IN      A       192.168.1.4

                                  ;; Query time: 5 msec
                                  ;; SERVER: 192.168.1.4#53(192.168.1.4)
                                  ;; WHEN: Tue Jan 11 08:01:39 2011
                                  ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 93

                                  ; <<>> DiG 9.7.2-P3 <<>> @192.168.1.253 host2.test.ip
                                  ; (1 server found)
                                  ;; global options: +cmd
                                  ;; Got answer:
                                  ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 41300
                                  ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0

                                  ;; QUESTION SECTION:
                                  ;host2.test.ip.                 IN      A

                                  ;; Query time: 32 msec
                                  ;; SERVER: 192.168.1.253#53(192.168.1.253)
                                  ;; WHEN: Tue Jan 11 08:02:10 2011
                                  ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 31

                                  Here are the settings from unbound, and host and domain overrides, etc.

                                  And showing that the override for the domain is listed in the unbound config.

                                  Domain overrides

                                  stub-zone:
                                  name: "test.ip"
                                  stub-addr: 192.168.1.4
                                  stub-prime: no

                                  Running snap
                                  2.0-BETA5 (i386)
                                  built on Mon Jan 10 13:14:45 EST 2011

                                  edit: on and yes I tried turning off dnssec support, same thing servfail

                                  Oh and just upgraded to last nights snap
                                  2.0-BETA5 (i386)
                                  built on Mon Jan 10 22:34:12 EST 2011

                                  Still fails - also seems to me that if your pointing pfsense to itself only (unbound) for dns in general setup, that upon update to new snap the reinstall of packages fail..

                                  unboundsettings.png_thumb
                                  unboundsettings.png
                                  overrides.png
                                  overrides.png_thumb

                                  An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                  If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                  Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                  SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • W
                                    wagonza
                                    last edited by

                                    @johnpoz:

                                    but now I have a domain override set, shows up in the unbound config, the server it points to at 192.168.1.4 is running bind, clearly answers for that zone test.ip, but when you ask the pfsense box running unbound you get servfail?

                                    Ok i think i might have an idea on the problem here, can you send me your unbound.conf please? You can comment out any private data.

                                    @johnpoz:

                                    Still fails - also seems to me that if your pointing pfsense to itself only (unbound) for dns in general setup, that upon update to new snap the reinstall of packages fail..

                                    yeah it wouldnt because no name resolution can take place as unbound is not started yet.

                                    Follow me on twitter http://twitter.com/wagonza
                                    http://www.thepackethub.co.za

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • S
                                      serangku
                                      last edited by

                                      @wagonza …

                                      from System: Advanced: Miscellaneous: System Tunables :
                                      kern.ipc.maxsockbuf Maximum socket buffer size default (4262144)

                                      i hope unbound back again on my site

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • W
                                        wagonza
                                        last edited by

                                        @serangku:

                                        from System: Advanced: Miscellaneous: System Tunables :
                                        kern.ipc.maxsockbuf Maximum socket buffer size default (4262144)

                                        i hope unbound back again on my site

                                        hmm…odd Unbound picked up a lower amount than that. Could have been an old snap that you were on which had a lower kern.ipc.maxsockbuf. Anyway it should be working for you since I did add some additional checks which will protect against what you experienced.
                                        I have also just committed ACL support so if you reinstall you will see an additional page to allow other networks to query Unbound.
                                        If you do use it just remember to add the necessary firewall rules.

                                        Let me know if you pick up any problems please.

                                        Follow me on twitter http://twitter.com/wagonza
                                        http://www.thepackethub.co.za

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • S
                                          serangku
                                          last edited by

                                          @wagonza …

                                          here my pfsense date

                                          2.0-BETA5 (i386)
                                          built on Mon Jan 10 13:14:45 EST 2011

                                          i use unbound for simple replace of dnsmasq without any feature, not yet …
                                          i have reinstall unbound package
                                          here my syslog :

                                          Jan 13 08:56:28 login: login on ttyv0 as root
                                          Jan 13 08:56:51 php: : The command '/usr/local/sbin/unbound-control start' returned exit code '1', the output was '[1294883811] unbound[29089:0] error: bind: address already in use [1294883811] unbound[29089:0] fatal error: could not open ports'
                                          Jan 13 08:57:30 sshd[28148]: Accepted keyboard-interactive/pam for root from 192.168.110.188 port 39425 ssh2
                                          Jan 13 08:57:30 sshd[28148]: subsystem request for sftp
                                          Jan 13 09:03:21 check_reload_status: syncing firewall

                                          then manually save on gui unbound

                                          Jan 13 09:03:22 unbound: [26869:0] info: service stopped (unbound 1.4.7).
                                          Jan 13 09:03:22 unbound: [26869:0] info: server stats for thread 0: 53 queries, 4 answers from cache, 49 recursions, 1 prefetch
                                          Jan 13 09:03:22 unbound: [26869:0] info: server stats for thread 0: requestlist max 5 avg 1.34 exceeded 0
                                          Jan 13 09:03:22 unbound: [26869:0] info: average recursion processing time 1.122806 sec
                                          Jan 13 09:03:22 unbound: [26869:0] info: histogram of recursion processing times
                                          Jan 13 09:03:22 unbound: [26869:0] info: [25%]=0.118928 median[50%]=0.104167 [75%]=0.614583
                                          Jan 13 09:03:22 unbound: [26869:0] info: lower(secs) upper(secs) recursions
                                          Jan 13 09:03:22 unbound: [26869:0] info: 0.131072 0.262144 4
                                          Jan 13 09:03:22 unbound: [26869:0] info: 0.262144 0.524288 5
                                          Jan 13 09:03:22 unbound: [26869:0] info: 0.524288 1.000000 13
                                          Jan 13 09:03:22 unbound: [26869:0] info: 1.000000 2.000000 24
                                          Jan 13 09:03:22 unbound: [26869:0] info: 2.000000 4.000000 2
                                          Jan 13 09:03:22 unbound: [26869:0] info: 4.000000 8.000000 1
                                          Jan 13 09:03:22 unbound: [26869:0] info: server stats for thread 1: 4 queries, 0 answers from cache, 4 recursions, 0 prefetch
                                          Jan 13 09:03:22 unbound: [26869:0] info: server stats for thread 1: requestlist max 4 avg 1 exceeded 0
                                          Jan 13 09:03:22 unbound: [26869:0] info: average recursion processing time 1.503178 sec
                                          Jan 13 09:03:22 unbound: [26869:0] info: histogram of recursion processing times
                                          Jan 13 09:03:22 unbound: [26869:0] info: [25%]=0.475712 median[50%]=0.5 [75%]=1
                                          Jan 13 09:03:22 unbound: [26869:0] info: lower(secs) upper(secs) recursions
                                          Jan 13 09:03:22 unbound: [26869:0] info: 0.524288 1.000000 1
                                          Jan 13 09:03:22 unbound: [26869:0] info: 1.000000 2.000000 2
                                          Jan 13 09:03:22 unbound: [26869:0] info: 2.000000 4.000000 1
                                          Jan 13 09:03:22 unbound: [4452:0] notice: init module 0: validator
                                          Jan 13 09:03:22 unbound: [4452:0] notice: init module 0: validator
                                          Jan 13 09:03:22 unbound: [4452:0] notice: init module 1: iterator
                                          Jan 13 09:03:22 unbound: [4452:0] notice: init module 1: iterator
                                          Jan 13 09:03:22 unbound: [4452:0] info: start of service (unbound 1.4.7).

                                          and from dmesg

                                          Syncing packages:
                                          Unbound

                                          Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /usr/local/pkg/unbound.inc on line 258

                                          Syncing packages:
                                          done.
                                          Executing rc.d items…
                                          Starting /usr/local/etc/rc.d/proxy_monitor.sh...
                                          done.
                                          Starting /usr/local/etc/rc.d/squid.sh...
                                          done.
                                          Starting /usr/local/etc/rc.d/unbound.sh...
                                          done.
                                          Bootup complete

                                          i think that warning because on acl there's im not use any acl, am i right ?

                                          so far running well with that syslog
                                          and back gain to use unbound
                                          really appreciate

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • T
                                            ToxIcon
                                            last edited by

                                            @wagonza I am having the strangest issue

                                            with Unbound enable

                                            dhcp clients can't browse any webpages

                                            but clients with Static IP can

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.