Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    IPv6 testing

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IPv6
    357 Posts 48 Posters 307.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • D
      databeestje
      last edited by

      I'll have to check that dhcp issue out, I've successfully had simultaneous dhcp v4 and dhcpv6 active, not sure what broke. Could be a silly user or group thing.

      Here is another bit of update.

      I have slowly been building out support in pfSense, it can do CARP with ipv6 addresses for redundancy now and a test cluster I've built has been working fine for over a month now. That cluster is providing connectivity for a Nameserver, webserver and mailserver. Basic firewalling and routing is working as it should.

      I have also been working on the Multiwan support for IPv6, this appears to be biting a number of small business networks or home users that have more then 1 internet connection.

      For this I have implemented "Network Prefix translation" (NPt previously NAT66) support. The way this works is that you can use a ULA range on the LAN networks (I registered my ULA range on sixxs.net). The network prefix translation then replaces the left 64 bits of the network prefix with the global unicast range when traffic goes out onto the internet. It performs the reverse step for traffic directed to the global unicast address which is then mapped the correct ULA address.

      In my test setup I have 3 WAN networks, each with their own global unicast range. Using this method all LAN devices have just 1 address and the pfSense firewall will perform all policy routing, this takes away all the need for intelligence on the LAN devices. This also makes all LAN devices directly reachable over either of the 3 internet connections. As long as I make firewall rules that permit the traffic ofcourse.

      This is, in my opinion, a huge step forward for management of the network.

      Never ever needing to change the local LAN addressing is a huge step in right direction.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • C
        Cino
        last edited by

        i should had pasted my log but I think remembering seeing error about the group dhcpd wasn't define. How would I add that to via command line?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • D
          databeestje
          last edited by

          I just committed a fix for the dhcp server group. It was supposed to be _dhcp, but I was using dhcpd instead.

          That should now be fixed. Also, it appears that apinger and lighttpd binaries are now properly built with ipv6 support. Dnsmasq is built with ipv6 support too, I just don't know if it actually listens on a ipv6 socket.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • D
            derekivey
            last edited by

            Hi all,

            I'm having issues setting this up. I am able to ping IPv6 addresses from pfsense, but all of my machines on my LAN are unable to ping external IPv6 addresses.

            Pfsense (2001:470:7:XXX:2 HE WAN IP / 2001:470:8:XXX:1 LAN IP):
            [2.0-BETA5][root@pfsense.mydomain.net]/tmp(68): ping6 ipv6.google.com
            PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 2001:470:7:XXX::2 –> 2001:4860:800f::63
            16 bytes from 2001:4860:800f::63, icmp_seq=0 hlim=59 time=19.898 ms
            16 bytes from 2001:4860:800f::63, icmp_seq=1 hlim=59 time=19.810 ms
            16 bytes from 2001:4860:800f::63, icmp_seq=2 hlim=59 time=21.954 ms
            16 bytes from 2001:4860:800f::63, icmp_seq=3 hlim=59 time=19.631 ms

            LAN Computer (2001:470:8:XXX::9)
            Pinging Google:
            D:\Users\Derek>ping 2001:4860:800f::63

            Pinging 2001:4860:800f::63 with 32 bytes of data:
            Request timed out.
            Request timed out.
            Request timed out.
            Request timed out.

            Traceroute:
            D:\Users\Derek>tracert ipv6.google.com

            Tracing route to ipv6.l.google.com [2001:4860:800f::68]
            over a maximum of 30 hops:

            1     *        *        *     Request timed out.
             2     *        *        *     Request timed out.
             3     *        *        *     Request timed out.
             4  ^C

            Pinging Default Gateway (Pfsense):
            D:\Users\Derek>ping 2001:470:8:XXX::1

            Pinging 2001:470:8:XXX::1 with 32 bytes of data:
            Reply from 2001:470:8:XXX::1: time<1ms
            Reply from 2001:470:8:XXX::1: time=2ms
            Reply from 2001:470:8:XXX::1: time<1ms
            Reply from 2001:470:8:XXX::1: time<1ms

            Ping statistics for 2001:470:8:XXX::1:
               Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
            Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
               Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 2ms, Average = 0ms

            I see traffic being passed in the firewall when I ping Google and also when I try to ping my self from a website (http://www.subnetonline.com/pages/ipv6-network-tools/online-ipv6-ping.php), so I'm not sure what's going on. Here is a screenshot of my log:

            I have disabled the Windows firewall on my PC.

            I also tried to run the IPv6 test:

            Any ideas?

            Thanks,
            Derek

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • D
              derekivey
              last edited by

              I fixed my issue. For some season pfsense was not forwarding IPv6 traffic. I ran:

              sysctl net.inet6.ip6.forwarding=1
              

              Where do I need to go to set this so it keeps that setting if I reboot pfsense?

              Thanks,
              Derek

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • D
                databeestje
                last edited by

                you can set that sysctl in the system tunables.

                I think you just didn't reboot after gitsyncing. It's in the rc.bootup script.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • C
                  Cino
                  last edited by

                  I've noticed a couple of other issues. After rebooting my box when the git is first installs, I can't access the internet. When i try to ping from the box to yahoo, it says there is no route. If i go to interfaces-WAN then click save-apply; I'm able to access the internet. I have to do this every time I reboot the box. When I install http://gitweb.pfsense.org/pfsense/mainline.git or just perform an update to the firmware, everything is back to normal.

                  When I try get the gateway under routing. The box wont let me input the ipv6 address that i got from he.net. It says the subnet is not within the range. If I leave the gateway blank and click save, it puts the ipv6 address that i try to manually enter.

                  When creating the WANIP6 interface after creating the gateway, I don't get an option to select the gateway.. Only option is none.

                  My box is setup with a DHCP WAN from my ISP (TWC). 1 LAN, 2 OpenVPN connects(i didn't create interfaces for them, 1 roadwarrior, the other is a site2site). I have a few packages installed but snort is the only networking one that would touch the wan interface.

                  When i have time I will do a fresh install without restoring my config file and see if there is a difference.. I've been meaning to do this since I have issues with the traffic-shaper. I can't access the internet after using the shaper wizard.. Somthing is blocking the traffic but i dont see it in the logs…. But that issue is for another thread  :-)

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • D
                    derekivey
                    last edited by

                    @databeestje:

                    you can set that sysctl in the system tunables.

                    I think you just didn't reboot after gitsyncing. It's in the rc.bootup script.

                    Ahh, ok that must've been the issue. Yeah, I never rebooted.

                    Thanks!

                    Derek

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • E
                      Efonnes
                      last edited by

                      Something that might be useful to those who are trying this code:  once you've set up gitsync for the first time, there is an additional option on the firmware updater settings in the web gui to gitsync when an update has been installed.  This way you won't need to run gitsync after the reboot (unless the gitsync failed for some reason).  I might later add some kind of pre-update check to make sure it is possible to do the operations needed for the gitsync, like fetching the code, etc., and cancel the update if the gitsync will fail - useful for when it is critical that the gitsync succeeds.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • G
                        gnhb
                        last edited by

                        Hi guys,
                        I really want to participate in the IPv6 fun here, but all my routers are running nanoBSD firmware and gitsync doesn't work there. What can I do?

                        GB

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • D
                          databeestje
                          last edited by

                          We might need to investigate in somehow producing a build or snapshot based on this branch, we'll investigate.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • S
                            sullrich
                            last edited by

                            @gnhb:

                            Hi guys,
                            I really want to participate in the IPv6 fun here, but all my routers are running nanoBSD firmware and gitsync doesn't work there. What can I do?
                            GB

                            gitsync should work on nanobsd?  Just need to make the image rw before you run it?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • jimpJ
                              jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                              last edited by

                              Last time I tried, it ran out of space on /var trying to actually install git.

                              Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                              Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                              Do not Chat/PM for help!

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • S
                                sullrich
                                last edited by

                                Custom images built from Seth's REPO:

                                http://cvs.pfsense.org/~sullrich/ipv6/

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • M
                                  m4rcu5
                                  last edited by

                                  @sullrich:

                                  Custom images built from Seth's REPO:

                                  http://cvs.pfsense.org/~sullrich/ipv6/

                                  Nice, is it auto build like the normal snapshots?

                                  -m4rcu5

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • C
                                    Cino
                                    last edited by

                                    I had time to run a fresh install. I changed my LAN IP, LAN dhcp range and WAN is set for dhcp by default. I install the git repository from http://gitweb.pfsense.org/pfsense/pfSense-smos.git. It does install some packages right after typing "playback gitsync" but then I get the prompt for the custom url. Rebooted the box and I still couldn't route to the internet. I save/apply my WAN interface and I was able to route to the internet again.. Did another reboot, and same results, cant route to the internet until save/apply my WAN interface.

                                    Any ideas what is causing this? I had a similar issue with 1.2.3 a while ago if my cable modem would reboot.. I remember there was a package that fixed the issue.. Can't remember the name but its a package that was for 1.2.3 I believe. I don't see it under 2.0.

                                    Thanks for all the work you guys have been making with ipv6…

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • D
                                      databeestje
                                      last edited by

                                      My box here has a dhcp and it still works after a update and gitsync. Odd.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • C
                                        Cino
                                        last edited by

                                        @databeestje:

                                        My box here has a dhcp and it still works after a update and gitsync. Odd.

                                        It worked after the gitsync, it stopped working after the first reboot. The WAN DHCP client does pick up an ip address from my ISP(Its same IP for about 12-24months), it also grabs the DNS servers.. When I try to ping from the box to lets say google.com, I get a no route error.. After saving/applying the WAN interface page… Its able to ping.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • I
                                          iFloris
                                          last edited by

                                          @Cino:

                                          When I try get the gateway under routing. The box wont let me input the ipv6 address that i got from he.net. It says the subnet is not within the range. If I leave the gateway blank and click save, it puts the ipv6 address that i try to manually enter.

                                          When creating the WANIP6 interface after creating the gateway, I don't get an option to select the gateway.. Only option is none.

                                          Cino, did you manage to solve this before you did a fresh install?
                                          I seem to be running into the same problem, but a fresh install isn't feasible at the moment.

                                          Also, Databeestje: Awesome.

                                          one layer of information
                                          removed

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • C
                                            Cino
                                            last edited by

                                            @iFloris:

                                            @Cino:

                                            When I try get the gateway under routing. The box wont let me input the ipv6 address that i got from he.net. It says the subnet is not within the range. If I leave the gateway blank and click save, it puts the ipv6 address that i try to manually enter.

                                            When creating the WANIP6 interface after creating the gateway, I don't get an option to select the gateway.. Only option is none.

                                            Cino, did you manage to solve this before you did a fresh install?
                                            I seem to be running into the same problem, but a fresh install isn't feasible at the moment.

                                            Also, Databeestje: Awesome.

                                            I wasn't able to resolve the issue…

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.