Kernel Panic

ftcsistemi · Jan 27, 2011, 4:40 PM

Hello, I tried the latest snap and the latest kernel but the problem persists

jimp · Jan 27, 2011, 4:39 PM

Hi ! i jast try with latest snap and latest kernel but he problem persist.

(to everyone) Please don't just say "latest kernel" - give a timestamp, be as precise as possible.

ftcsistemi · Jan 27, 2011, 4:44 PM

@ermal:

Uploaded a new kernel http://files.pfsense.org/kernel_new.gz
Beaware that you need to be updated to the latest snapshot before using this kernel otherwise you will get hangs.

the kernel is in the quote, and the snap is the latest at this time in the update manager

jimp · Jan 27, 2011, 4:46 PM

Just because that is true now doesn't mean that will be true in a couple hours. Timestamps are important.

LostInIgnorance · Jan 27, 2011, 5:34 PM

As I had asked before, since things keep getting astray, does the panic I received on my Soekris board after doing this process relevant to anything or should I be ignoring it?

Updated to pfSense-Full-Update-2.0-BETA5-i386-20110126-0422.tgz 26-Jan-2011 09:47 83M

/etc/rc.conf_mount_rw
fetch http://files.pfsense.org/kernel_new.gz
cp kernel_new.gz /boot/kernel/kernel.gz

Rebooted
Pushed traffic over OpenVPN

Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 0; apic id = 00
fault virtual address   = 0x0
fault code              = supervisor read, page not present
instruction pointer     = 0x20:0x0
stack pointer           = 0x28:0xd553ebc0
frame pointer           = 0x28:0xd553ebcc
code segment            = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b
                        = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1
processor eflags        = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0
current process         = 12 (irq5: vr1)
[thread]
Stopped at      0:      *** error reading from address 0 ***
db> bt
Tracing pid 12 tid 64026 td 0xc3aa4780
m_tag_delete(c4dde600,c4de0b3d) at m_tag_delete+0x32
m_tag_delete_chain(c4dde600,0,d553ec2c,c0c94f99,c4dde600,...) at m_tag_delete_chain+0x82
mb_dtor_mbuf(c4dde600,100,0,c0a9041f,c3a92000,...) at mb_dtor_mbuf+0x25
uma_zfree_arg(c1d7b000,c4dde600,0,c3a28000,d553ec70,...) at uma_zfree_arg+0x29
m_freem(c4dde600,c3debe00,c3a92000,7f,7f,...) at m_freem+0x43
vr_txeof(0,c12c69c0,d5530008,0,0,...) at vr_txeof+0x340
vr_intr(c3a28000,0,109,dbd32e12,b15,...) at vr_intr+0x1c7
intr_event_execute_handlers(c39757f8,c3972180,c0e6ba48,52d,c39721f0,...) at intr_event_execute_handlers+0x14b
ithread_loop(c3a8e450,d553ed38,6000,f600001b,0,...) at ithread_loop+0x6b
fork_exit(c09ae910,c3a8e450,d553ed38) at fork_exit+0x91
fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0x8
--- trap 0, eip = 0, esp = 0xd553ed70, ebp = 0 ---
db>[/thread]

eri-- · Jan 27, 2011, 6:44 PM

On the same link posted another kernel.
Thank you very much to every one helping on this.

LostIgnorance its very valuable just that this is not chat and i just do not want to spam with useless comments.

vito · Jan 27, 2011, 7:50 PM

No problem for testing!

so should i download just the kernel from the same link with out a snap update?
I am on snap
2.0-BETA5 (i386)
built on Wed Jan 26 09:44:03 EST 2011

Just want to make sure.

eri-- · Jan 27, 2011, 8:10 PM

Yeah just download the file after this post i updated it again.

eri-- · Jan 27, 2011, 8:43 PM

FYI i just committed some patches to pfSense repo which should fix the hangs and the panics.
All those on non full installs of i386 grab the next snapshot and test when it comes out.

jimp · Jan 27, 2011, 10:30 PM

Since the snapshot builder won't be done with its current run for a while yet, I ran off an i386 full update on my builder and uploaded it here:
http://cvs.pfsense.org/~jimp/pfSense-Full-Update-2.0-BETA4-i386-20110127-1627.tgz

If someone wants to give that a shot, have at it. The amd64 builder doesn't take quite as long, it should be up in a couple hours, the nanobsd builds probably won't be up until after midnight.

vito · Jan 27, 2011, 10:49 PM

Jimp,
does this have the kernel that had to be downloaded included or do we need to still do the update then download the kernel from ermal's post?
Thanks!

jimp · Jan 27, 2011, 10:53 PM

Ermal checked the patches into the repo so this should be equivalent to that, or better.

pbl · Jan 28, 2011, 12:31 AM

Sorry to be so dense… does this mean that the update that I'm performing right now will have the discussed fixes?

jimp · Jan 28, 2011, 12:38 AM

Not if you're doing an auto update. The snapshots are still building, probably won't be done for a couple hours.

I posted a URL earlier to a build I made for i386 full installs that should have the fixes, though it didn't fix my problem (FTP still has issues…)

vito · Jan 28, 2011, 1:02 AM

~~I just installed your build from the link jimp…testing now...~~

Update: with the snap from your link the system did panic.

jimp, is the text dump in this build? i just went to look for it and do not see the file.

vito · Jan 28, 2011, 1:05 AM

tested one more time and it crashed again. :(

jimp · Jan 28, 2011, 1:20 AM

Textdumps should be on in those builds… see my other post: http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,32711.0.html

I guess just wait and try the 'real' snapshot when it uploads later tonight.

vito · Jan 28, 2011, 1:29 AM

yep, i saw the post and checked /var/crash
nothing in the folder.

will the build on the snap server be different then the one you posted?

jimp · Jan 28, 2011, 1:32 AM

In theory it should be about the same, but in practice that isn't always the case.

clahti · Jan 28, 2011, 1:34 AM

quick question, I am in the freeze/hang camp. I don't get a kernel panic on the console, so when I update to the next snapshot should I expect a dump in /var/crash when the system hangs?