Kernel Panic
-
It is kinda nice though that the pfSense now knows it crashed and asks me if I would like to send the error info to the developers.
We have detected a crash report. Click here for more information.
though the only thing the tab shows on the error report is this
Crash report begins. Anonymous machine information: i386 8.1-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p2 #1: Sun Feb 6 23:47:16 EST 2011 sullrich@FreeBSD_8.0_pfSense_2.0-snaps.pfsense.org:/usr/obj.pfSense/usr/pfSensesrc/src/sys/pfSense_Dev.8 Crash report details: 2048That one is a false positive.
The actual report would have done a lot more.
If it stops at a db> prompt, it isn't collecting the crash info automatically for whatever reason.
-
@jimp - any ideas about my crash? I assume it is related to this thread…
-
I'm in the same situation there as well - my pfSense box stops at the 'db>' prompt after a panic, generating similar information-free reports. Also, in contrast to what I believe other folks have reported, my pfSense box doesn't automatically reboot after a panic, but rather sits happily at the db> prompt, patiently - and indefinitely - awaiting my input. (Which is why I am loathe to do any testing unless I'm within arms reach of the particular box in question!) Is there a setting I've missed somewhere that enables this automatic rebooting, or is my pfSense box just that unhappy?
-
pwnell,
I don't know, it looks similar to another panic that was already reported over the weekend. Have you tried a new snapshot?
fasteddy,
What type of install are you on? full/nano? i386 or amd64? How much RAM and swap space?
If you can get a capture of the panic (even a picture of it) and the output of 'bt' at the debug prompt it would help.
-
I am on a full install, i386, 2GB RAM, 80GB Hard drive, 4GB swap space. The panic information, backtrace info, and general situation remain the same as my original post (on page 15 of this thread). http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,31721.msg170362.html#msg170362
-
I am on a full install, i386, 2GB RAM, 80GB Hard drive, 4GB swap space. The panic information, backtrace info, and general situation remain the same as my original post (on page 15 of this thread). http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,31721.msg170362.html#msg170362
Show me the output of:
sysctl debug.ddb -
Here goes:
# sysctl debug.ddb debug.ddb.capture.data: debug.ddb.capture.bufsize: 49152 debug.ddb.capture.inprogress: 0 debug.ddb.capture.maxbufsize: 5242880 debug.ddb.capture.bufoff: 0 debug.ddb.scripting.unscript: debug.ddb.scripting.scripts: lockinfo=show locks; show alllocks; show lockedvnods kdb.enter.panic=textdump set; capture on; run lockinfo; show pcpu; bt; ps; alltrace; capture off; call doadump; reset kdb.enter.witness=run lockinfo debug.ddb.textdump.do_version: 1 debug.ddb.textdump.do_panic: 1 debug.ddb.textdump.do_msgbuf: 1 debug.ddb.textdump.do_ddb: 1 debug.ddb.textdump.do_config: 1 debug.ddb.textdump.pending: 0 -
That all looks normal, like it should be doing the textdumps…
What about:
cat /boot/kernel/pfsense_kernel.txt -
Doesn't have a whole lot to say:
# cat /boot/kernel/pfsense_kernel.txt UP # -
It's enough :-)
That's the uniprocessor kernel. I'm running the SMP kernels. Perhaps that is the difference. Can you switch to an SMP kernel and see if the crashes leave you at the debug prompt still? There are instructions earlier in this thread for switching kernels (also you can edit that text file and change it to SMP instead of UP and the next update will use the SMP kernel instead)
-
Installed the latest one available
2.0-BETA5 (i386)
built on Sun Feb 6 23:54:00 EST 2011I have a 1 hour 15 minute uptime …. Holding thumbs.
-
JimP,
Did you need me to do anything while I am here working on other projects? Anything I can do to help debug this?
-
No, Ermal is going to be the one having to look into the actual panics.
I was just trying to figure out why some people aren't getting the proper crash dumps like they should.
-
I've changed to the SMP kernel and updated to the latest snapshots as of 15 minutes ago, and my machine seems to be automatically rebooting and generating proper crash reports now. Thanks jimp!
Unfortunately, I am still able to crash my system at will the same way I have been from the get go - by accessing the web gui through the VPN. I sent the (now useful!) crash report via the web gui, is there anything I can/should do beyond that at this point?
-
When the next snapshot comes out later this evening/tonight, update to it and try to reproduce it again.
-
JimP, who exactly were you talking to? or was it just a general reference to everyone?
-
just in general for anyone still getting crashes… hopefully it's more stable.
-
I won't get to testing that box (p4 dell gonna kick it in the parking lot) till tomorrow morning, so I'll have to get back to you on the test.
-
The snapshot with the fixes Jim mentioned is now up, I've upgraded all my systems to it and no issues. Granted I wasn't seeing any panics previously either, so those who can replicate issues, please test.
-
So far so good using this morning's build - tinkered around with the web gui for awhile with no crashes (couldn't even log in before…), did the same with a shell connection (which always crashed after a few minutes before) and am 1/4 of the way through transferring a 1.25GB file through the vpn to the pfSense box via SCP with no crashes so far. (It has always been communication directly with the remote pfSense box through the VPN that triggered crashes for me). Fingers crossed...
I am curious though - and I'll (dis)qualify this by saying that I am not a developer, nor do I pretend to fully understand much of the goings on in the git repository, but - I don't see anything in the list of commits since the last snapshot I tried that I would have expected to have an impact on this particular issue. Any idea as to what was causing the panics in the first place?
