Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Virtual IP issues in latest build (Feb2)

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.0-RC Snapshot Feedback and Problems - RETIRED
    12 Posts 6 Posters 4.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • G
      grazman
      last edited by

      (I also have experienced this with several previous build in the past several weeks).

      When adding a virtual IP (as a Proxy ARP, IP Alias) fails to arp the MAC address of the WAN interface (ping does not work, even though there is a rule to specifically allow it). If I add it as "other"
      I can ping it (only from inside, and pfSense properly resolves the MAC address on arp-ing it).

      I've been trying to understand what is not happening correctly to allow me to add a virtual IP and NAT it (1:1) and forward traffic to it and originate traffic from the proper virtual IP.

      Is anyone else having a problem doing this on a recent build?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • G
        grazman
        last edited by

        OK, I've read the ping behavior is normal according to this:
        http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/What_are_Virtual_IP_Addresses%3F

        What I cannot seem to be able to do now in 2.0 is use virtual IP's on the WAN interface (1:1).

        Steps to reproduce:

        1. Created virtual IP (Proxy ARP) with 75.111.112.113

        2. Created 1:1 NAT
        WAN 75.111.112.113 192.168.1.130 * public address for 1:1 NAT

        3. Create Firewall>Rules>WAN
        TCP 75.111.112.113 * 192.168.1.130 80 (HTTP) * none

        Since I am using 1:1 there does not need to be any port forwards in NAT for this virtual IP. I ran a pcap of both interfaces. I see the WAN virtual getting the request to establish a session, nothing else. The LAN ip in the 1:1 NAT does not show any traffic destined for it.

        If this is the case, is it broken or did I perform the 1:1 NAT improperly?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • H
          hshardy3
          last edited by

          Change the WAN interface IP temporarily to the virtual IP address that you will use in the 1:1 NAT, then set WAN IP back to original address. This sends the proper ARP to your ISP's router cache that your virtual IP should receive traffic. Don't know if this is your problem but I must always do this if I use proxy virtual IPs with my ISP which is AT&T DSL service. Search for my user name in the 1.2.3 forum if you want details on why this is required.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • jimpJ
            jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
            last edited by

            If it's in the same subnet as your WAN, use a CARP type VIP. Otherwise use an IP Alias VIP.

            Both of those are "real" IPs instead of just proxy ARP, and may behave better with your upstream router.

            Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

            Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

            Do not Chat/PM for help!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • G
              grazman
              last edited by

              None of these things work (changing the wan ip and back again, or using a carp ip).

              Is there anything wrong with my procedures? This does not seem to be an issue with 1.2.3, which is why I posted it here.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • B
                bEsTiAn
                last edited by

                I confirm I face the same issue since a few days now.
                I have two WAN providers, one with MAC statically registered, and another one without.
                The one with the statically registered MAC mentions that it sees the vIP's MAC for the real IP and vice-versa !

                edit : and if i fail-over to my 1.2.3 pfsense, all is good

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • G
                  grazman
                  last edited by

                  anyone else successfully using virtual IP's with NAt on 2.0? If so, a recent build? which one?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • P
                    pceglowski
                    last edited by

                    Yes, I am having exactly the same issue here. What I have noticed helps is if you remove and add back the IPAlias VIP.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • M
                      mxx
                      last edited by

                      @grazman:

                      anyone else successfully using virtual IP's with NAt on 2.0? If so, a recent build? which one?

                      I'm using carp type VIPs with dnat + aon and never had any problem.
                      Currently I'm on Fri Feb 18 (i386)

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • P
                        pceglowski
                        last edited by

                        I am on amd64 from 23rd Feb

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • jimpJ
                          jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                          last edited by

                          Anyone with an IP Alias issue, check the output of "ifconfig -a" when it's working and when it's failing, and see if there is a difference.

                          Also be sure to check the system logs for anything around the time it started to fail.

                          Tracking down something with a really vague problem report like this is difficult, we need a lot more information.

                          I don't have any issues using 1:1 NAT currently, nor do most of the people I have worked with recently using 1:1 NAT on 2.0. It's a very common feature, and if it were broken in general, there would be lots of noise/yellling.

                          I have seen some types fail in certain situations, but it had more to do with the switch and/or ISP gear plugged in on the WAN side than anything else.

                          Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                          Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                          Do not Chat/PM for help!

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • P
                            pceglowski
                            last edited by

                            Does anybody else suffering from those problem running in a virtual environment behind a vDS?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.