Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    2.0RC1 i386 full install : multi-wan and ftp server behind pfsense

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.0-RC Snapshot Feedback and Problems - RETIRED
    11 Posts 4 Posters 3.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • B Offline
      bEsTiAn
      last edited by

      I have an FTP server running behind the pfsense box which has two WANs.
      I can confirm that since recently the transparent NAT for passive mode is working with the WAN on which is set up the default gateway in the routing setup of pfsense. But I also can confirm that passive mode fails on the other WAN. I see in the FTP client it receives the correct IP for the passive connection to establish, but it seems that the firewall rule is not opened as traffic is being blocked. And I can confirm that as soon as I switch both WANs (i.e. the secondary WAN becomes my default gateway) the behavior is switched as well.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • E Offline
        eri--
        last edited by

        Please put proof on this.
        It should follow the same route the parent is so gather the required info to debug/report this.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • B Offline
          bEsTiAn
          last edited by

          Hi,

          Can you assist me on what precise debug report you need for this ?
          Alternatively I can give you remote access to the box if you prefer ? Might be quicker for you.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • E Offline
            eri--
            last edited by

            Start by your snapshot date!
            IF you are not on latest snapshot please go to the latest one.
            Otherwise i need a state dump and rules.debug from your system to verify this is really happening.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • jimpJ Offline
              jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
              last edited by

              Might this be related to the route-to thing that cmb backed out of the patches file over the weekend?

              Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

              Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

              Do not Chat/PM for help!

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • B Offline
                bouncer
                last edited by

                I cannot see any 2.0RC1 released  ???

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • jimpJ Offline
                  jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                  last edited by

                  Because it's not out yet. It's still Beta5.

                  Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                  Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                  Do not Chat/PM for help!

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • B Offline
                    bEsTiAn
                    last edited by

                    I was using snapshots of 14th I have now upgraded to snapshot 2.0-BETA5 (i386) built on Mon Feb 21 23:20:11 EST 2011
                    (funny it reverted from RC1 to BETA5)

                    The behavior is just the same I am afraid.

                    ermal I have PM'ed you

                    Thx for your support

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • jimpJ Offline
                      jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                      last edited by

                      It's not "funny" that it reverted, it was done on purpose… the "RC1" snapshot (there was only one) was deemed unworthy of the tag and it was rolled back. There are several threads about the change.

                      Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                      Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                      Do not Chat/PM for help!

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • B Offline
                        bEsTiAn
                        last edited by

                        I confirm that my original symptoms are still reproduced under the latest snapshot (i386)

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • B Offline
                          bEsTiAn
                          last edited by

                          and I also confirm that the issue is not present if the sticky sessions option is disabled !

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.