Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    NIC Assignment LAN vs WAN

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    6 Posts 4 Posters 3.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • W
      wrems
      last edited by

      I’m new to pfSense.  I’m liking it so far.

      I’m working with older equipment that I have on hand right now.  AMD 1.2 Ghz, 512MB Ram that has onboard realtek 10/100 nic.  I also have 2 PCI cards both 10/100.  Trendnet (realtek) and Intel Pro.  My current needs are basic no vlans etc just connecting to cable broadband in a home environment.  I have a Gige Switch behind the router for the rest of my LAN and I have a WAP off that switch.  So the pfSense router is only for my internet traffic.

      What is the best way to orient my NIC’s?  I’m assuming the onboard Realtek should be a last resort and I should use the Trendnet and the Intel pci cards.  That’s what I’m currently doing anyway…

      Is there a logical or good reason as to the assignment of these cards?  LAN/WAN...  Do I want to put the better Intel card on the WAN or the LAN side for optimal performance?  Does it make any difference?

      Thanks for helping a noob.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Cry HavokC
        Cry Havok
        last edited by

        If you're running pfSense as a simple firewall then it won't matter much. If you're using Squid or another proxy then put the Intel on the LAN.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • W
          wrems
          last edited by

          That's how I had it set up.  Until I get a gigabit card probably a Intel Pro Dual.  I am using squid.  Thanks for the input!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • J
            JoelC707
            last edited by

            Just out of curiosity, what is wrong with the onboard card? What makes an add-in realtek better than the onboard realtek? You've got me wondering about my deployment at work now. I'm using an older Dell PE 1650 with a pair of onboard gigabit cards (network is 100 meg though). The onboard cards are Intel I think but could be Broadcom. I am running snort on it now (dual cpus and 3 GB of RAM), should I use add-in cards or are my onboard ones ok?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J
              jasonlitka
              last edited by

              @JoelC707:

              Just out of curiosity, what is wrong with the onboard card? What makes an add-in realtek better than the onboard realtek? You've got me wondering about my deployment at work now. I'm using an older Dell PE 1650 with a pair of onboard gigabit cards (network is 100 meg though). The onboard cards are Intel I think but could be Broadcom. I am running snort on it now (dual cpus and 3 GB of RAM), should I use add-in cards or are my onboard ones ok?

              Realtek NICs stink, on-board or otherwise.

              Intel > Broadcom > Everything else.

              I can break anything.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Cry HavokC
                Cry Havok
                last edited by

                I'd agree that the 10/100 Realtek cards aren't good (and some define low end), but their Gbit cards are ok (not amazing, but I've had no problems with mine).

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • First post
                  Last post
                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.