Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Watchdog Timeout when using Cross Cable between 2 pfSense boxes

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.0-RC Snapshot Feedback and Problems - RETIRED
    2 Posts 2 Posters 1.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S
      stramato
      last edited by

      I have this setup:

      (dsl1,2,3)=== [pfsense load balancer] –-cross cable--- [pfsense w/ squid] –------- (LAN)
                      DHCP                192.168.1.1              192.168.1.2      192.168.2.1    DHCP

      I can access the Web GUI of both pfSense machines from a LAN client, through 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.2.1

      When I try to intensively access 192.168.1.1, say, when I try to upload a Firmware file, 192.168.1.2 interface craps out returning this error:

      rl0: Watchdog Timeout

      When I'm just surfing the internet it works fine. Though I have not tested it yet with lots of active connections (e.g. lots of LAN clients).

      I'm using Realtek 10/100 PCI LAN Cards on both machines. pfSense 2.0 BETA4.

      Why is this happening and how do you think I can prevent this?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • W
        wallabybob
        last edited by

        There seems to be a widely held view that at least the early Realtek NICs were pretty terrible. Perhaps you have some of that vintage.

        I have a couple of Realtek 10/100 PCI NICs and they seem to work OK for me.

        A while ago even dual port 10/100 Intel NICs were available quite cheaply on Ebay. I don't know the current situation. I forget the details now but a fairly recent FreeBSD driver for Intel 10/100 NICs had a bug in that it erroneously determined that some Intel 10/100 NICs had capabilities they really didn't have. I suspect some of the older NICs might not get a lot of test cycles from the FreeBSD developers. You might be better off spending a bit more money and getting a more current NIC.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • First post
          Last post
        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.