Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    HE ipv6 gateway doesn't come online

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IPv6
    21 Posts 7 Posters 12.7k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • jimpJ
      jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
      last edited by

      I'm seeing a similar issue as well, still trying to track it down, though.  In my case the HE.net gateway also never comes online.

      A packet capture of the IPv4 traffic on my WAN shows packets going both ways, wireshark shows them to be the encapsulated IPv6 pings from me, and the replies from the far side. However, the ping replies are never seen on the gif interface. A packet capture on gif0 only shows the requests leaving, never coming back.

      I see the state, and it shows up as:

      ipv6-icmp 	2001:470:xxxx:yyy::2 -> 2001:470:xxxx:yyy::1 	NO_TRAFFIC:NO_TRAFFIC
      

      Even though there is constant outbound traffic. Traffic doesn't appear to be blocked by firewall rules either, as nothing is logged. It's as if the return traffic just never makes it into the gif interface.

      I show an ipv6 also:

      ipv6 	my.wan.ip.addr -> 209.51.181.2 	MULTIPLE:MULTIPLE
      

      Packets on the gif interface:

      : tcpdump -i gif0
      tcpdump: WARNING: gif0: no IPv4 address assigned
      tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
      listening on gif0, link-type NULL (BSD loopback), capture size 96 bytes
      19:23:01.272308 IP6 2001:470:xxxx:yyy::2 > 2001:470:xxx:yyy::1: ICMP6, echo request, seq 15619, length 24
      19:23:02.277803 IP6 2001:470:xxxx:yyy::2 > 2001:470:xxx:yyy::1: ICMP6, echo request, seq 15875, length 24
      19:23:03.284616 IP6 2001:470:xxxx:yyy::2 > 2001:470:xxx:yyy::1: ICMP6, echo request, seq 16131, length 24
      

      Packets on the v4 side:

      : tcpdump -ni em2 host 209.51.181.2
      tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
      listening on em2, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes
      19:27:52.633747 IP my.wan.ip.addr > 209.51.181.2: IP6 2001:470:xxxx.yyy::2 > 2001:470:xxxx.yyy::1: ICMP6, echo request, seq 24324, length 24
      19:27:52.654180 IP 209.51.181.2 > my.wan.ip.addr: IP6 2001:470:xxxx.yyy::1 > 2001:470:xxxx.yyy::2: ICMP6, echo reply, seq 24324, length 24
      19:27:53.639518 IP my.wan.ip.addr > 209.51.181.2: IP6 2001:470:xxxx.yyy::2 > 2001:470:xxxx.yyy::1: ICMP6, echo request, seq 24580, length 24
      19:27:53.662861 IP 209.51.181.2 > my.wan.ip.addr: IP6 2001:470:xxxx.yyy::1 > 2001:470:xxxx.yyy::2: ICMP6, echo reply, seq 24580, length 24
      19:27:54.644236 IP my.wan.ip.addr > 209.51.181.2: IP6 2001:470:xxxx.yyy::2 > 2001:470:xxxx.yyy::1: ICMP6, echo request, seq 24836, length 24
      19:27:54.675180 IP 209.51.181.2 > my.wan.ip.addr: IP6 2001:470:xxxx.yyy::1 > 2001:470:xxxx.yyy::2: ICMP6, echo reply, seq 24836, length 24
      19:27:55.644757 IP my.wan.ip.addr > 209.51.181.2: IP6 2001:470:xxxx.yyy::2 > 2001:470:xxxx.yyy::1: ICMP6, echo request, seq 25092, length 24
      19:27:55.676139 IP 209.51.181.2 > my.wan.ip.addr: IP6 2001:470:xxxx.yyy::1 > 2001:470:xxxx.yyy::2: ICMP6, echo reply, seq 25092, length 24
      

      This may or may not be expected, but I can't ping6 myself on the gif interface either, but I can ping6 my own LAN interface of course.

      : ping6 2001:470:xxxx.yyy::2
      PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 2001:470:xxxx.yyy::2 --> 2001:470:xxxx.yyy::2
      --- 2001:470:xxxx.yyy::2 ping6 statistics ---
      3 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss
      
      : ping6 2001:470:zzzz.yyy::1
      PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 2001:470:zzzz.yyy::1 --> 2001:470:zzzz.yyy::1
      16 bytes from 2001:470:zzzz.yyy::1, icmp_seq=0 hlim=64 time=4.259 ms
      16 bytes from 2001:470:zzzz.yyy::1, icmp_seq=1 hlim=64 time=2.336 ms
      --- 2001:470:zzzz:yyy::1 ping6 statistics ---
      2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
      round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev = 2.336/3.298/4.259/0.962 ms
      
      

      Some other info…

      : ifconfig gif0
      gif0: flags=8051 <up,pointopoint,running,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1280
              tunnel inet my.wan.ip.addr --> 209.51.181.2
              inet6 2001:470:xxxx.yyy::2 --> 2001:470:xxxx.yyy::1 prefixlen 128 
              inet6 fe80::240:48ff:feb2:8216%gif0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x10 
              nd6 options=3 <performnud,accept_rtadv>options=1 <accept_rev_ethip_ver>: netstat -rn -f inet6  (Edited for brevity)
      Routing tables
      
      Internet6:
      Destination                       Gateway                       Flags      Netif Expire
      default                           2001:470:xxxx.yyy::1          UGS        gif0
      2001:470:xxxx.yyy::1              2001:470:xxxx.yyy::2          UH         gif0
      2001:470:zzzz.yyy::/64            link#1                        U           em0
      2001:470:zzzz.yyy::1              link#1                        UHS         lo0</accept_rev_ethip_ver></performnud,accept_rtadv></up,pointopoint,running,multicast> 
      

      EDIT: And FYI, a reboot doesn't change anything.

      Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

      Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

      Do not Chat/PM for help!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • D
        databeestje
        last edited by

        Are all the people here affected when the WAN is a PPPoE connection? I've never seen this particular behaviour on static addressing lines.

        Did people also add a allow ipv6 icmp for the WAN address of the gif interface? Might be related. I happen to have one, but my internet is cable internet from Ziggo.

        Another hunch, if this is DSL and I also see mention of the sagem modems is that they might not pass the protocol 41 over the PPPoE connection. That would mean it's possible to troubleshoot if another dsl modem is available.

        I believe a number of the SpeedTouch modems in bridge modem also have this particular issue.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • jimpJ
          jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
          last edited by

          I have it running over my Cable connection (opt1) which is DHCP.

          I see the return traffic coming back on the physical interface so it doesn't appear to be getting blocked by my ISP or equipment, the OS sees it, it just doesn't make it back onto the gif interface for whatever weird reason.

          I also have an IPv6 allow for icmp, both on the real WAN and on the gif interface. I'll try some more tests though. I wouldn't think it would be a firewall rule though because it's return traffic, the state should be letting it back in.

          Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

          Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

          Do not Chat/PM for help!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • jimpJ
            jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
            last edited by

            OK, for giggles I reset my default route to my Cable line, opt1, and it came up!

            Then I reset it back to my WAN (DSL) and it went back down.

            Then I added a static route over my cable to the he.net tunnel broker and it stayed up!

            So it appears we might need some code to add a static route to the gif endpoint based off the interface chosen when making the gif. That may be a general 2.0 bug.

            Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

            Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

            Do not Chat/PM for help!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • D
              databeestje
              last edited by

              Don't we all love multiwan when it works.

              I'll add code that adds a route for gif tunnel endpoints for the interface they belong on. Perhaps a filter rule could theoretically help.

              Adding a filter rule on the correct wan that has reply-to set for that traffic, would that work? Maybe the traffic is stateless and then the state does not match.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • jimpJ
                jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                last edited by

                Not sure if I rule with reply-to would be sufficient or not. I can try it, but I'd need to figure out how that rule would look to match just the gif traffic without allowing being too permissive.

                Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                Do not Chat/PM for help!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • V
                  vinsomething
                  last edited by

                  I've seen similar weirdness (and different symptoms at one point - I was seeing no return traffic on the physical interface until I added a default IPv6 gateway) but I haven't spent enough time isolating.

                  See my post here for what I was seeing (I was trying to replace my HE tunnel with a SIXXS one on my Cable/DHCP interface which worked once I set a default GW):
                  https://www.sixxs.net/forum/?msg=setup-4100929

                  Yesterday I couldn't get my other HE tunnel up on my PPPoE DSL WAN interface, but I haven't invested too much time into troubleshooting.

                  Let me know if I can help by providing logs or testing anything.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • D
                    databeestje
                    last edited by

                    Just do what Jim did. Add a static route for the IPv4 address of the tunnelbroker on the correct WAN interface.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • V
                      vinsomething
                      last edited by

                      Got it.  I also had to upgrade the firmware on the DSL modem to something from the last 5 years :)

                      I don't think this is quite what I was seeing a couple weeks ago as I was only trying to bring up a single tunnel on my primary WAN at the time (and by adding a v6 default gateway is what kicked it into gear)…... but it's working now the way I want to so I'm happy.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • D
                        databeestje
                        last edited by

                        I've found that the default route might dissapear when the parent interface goes down.

                        I have not debugged that.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.