Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    PfFlowd not sending packets

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved pfSense Packages
    18 Posts 3 Posters 6.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • jimpJ
      jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
      last edited by

      pfflowd starts up for me and sends packets, provided I filled out all of the fields on the page. Perhaps it's not leaving the interface you expect? For instance, did you fill in the source IP as your LAN IP if the destination IP is your LAN IP?

      I just filled in the fields and directed it at an IP and port 9999 and tried a few connections, and I see it sending data.

      
      11:21:17.196784 IP 192.168.197.148.38793 > 192.168.197.135.9999: UDP, length 208
      11:21:17.198949 IP 192.168.197.148.38793 > 192.168.197.135.9999: UDP, length 116
      11:21:17.200322 IP 192.168.197.148.38793 > 192.168.197.135.9999: UDP, length 116
      

      Here is what it looks like in the process list when it's running.

      root   40285  0.0  0.2  2912   816  ??  Ss   11:18AM   0:00.00 /usr/local/sbin/pfflowd -n 192.168.197.135:9999 -s 192.168.197.148 -S any -v 9
      

      Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

      Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

      Do not Chat/PM for help!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • D
        donoreo
        last edited by

        @jimp:

        pfflowd starts up for me and sends packets, provided I filled out all of the fields on the page. Perhaps it's not leaving the interface you expect? For instance, did you fill in the source IP as your LAN IP if the destination IP is your LAN IP?

        I just filled in the fields and directed it at an IP and port 9999 and tried a few connections, and I see it sending data.

        
        11:21:17.196784 IP 192.168.197.148.38793 > 192.168.197.135.9999: UDP, length 208
        11:21:17.198949 IP 192.168.197.148.38793 > 192.168.197.135.9999: UDP, length 116
        11:21:17.200322 IP 192.168.197.148.38793 > 192.168.197.135.9999: UDP, length 116
        

        Here is what it looks like in the process list when it's running.

        root   40285  0.0  0.2  2912   816  ??  Ss   11:18AM   0:00.00 /usr/local/sbin/pfflowd -n 192.168.197.135:9999 -s 192.168.197.148 -S any -v 9
        

        My PFsense is in bridge mode.  It only has one IP.  The source IP is that IP, the host is the machine I want it sent to.  I have Any, LAN and WAN in the direction field and all versions of netflow.  I can see it running on the command line, it looks just like yours, aside from the obvious IP address difference, but nothing it being sent.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • jimpJ
          jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
          last edited by

          Not sure how a bridge might interact with that, but have you used tcpdump on both the "wan" and "lan" side when looking for the netflow packets?

          Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

          Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

          Do not Chat/PM for help!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • D
            donoreo
            last edited by

            @jimp:

            Not sure how a bridge might interact with that, but have you used tcpdump on both the "wan" and "lan" side when looking for the netflow packets?

            I do not know how to do that really, but I am currently running tcpdump grepped looking for 9996 and nothing on that port number is showing up.

            tcpdump | grep 9996 is what I ran.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • jimpJ
              jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
              last edited by

              Try:

              tcpdump -ni <wan interface=""> port 9996</wan>
              

              Where <wan interface="">is the physical WAN interface, like em0, vr1, etc.
              If that doesn't find anything, use the LAN interface.

              Or just use Diagnostics > Packet capture and fill in the box to filter by port.</wan>

              Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

              Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

              Do not Chat/PM for help!

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • D
                donoreo
                last edited by

                Nothing.  I tried bge0, bge1, bridge0, nothing.  Diagnostics did the same thing.

                This is really annoying.  I have been trying for weeks now to find something that I can use to track our internet usage and can find…nothing!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • D
                  donoreo
                  last edited by

                  Should I file a bug report?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • jimpJ
                    jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                    last edited by

                    Unfortunately I can't replicate your issue, it works for me when I set it up.

                    It's a little more manual process but you could try softflowd
                    http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Exporting_NetFlow_with_softflowd

                    Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                    Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                    Do not Chat/PM for help!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • D
                      donoreo
                      last edited by

                      That was going to be my next step.

                      You are not testing in Bridge mode though.  That can be considered it's own bug.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • jimpJ
                        jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                        last edited by

                        Actually I am testing in bridge mode as well as normal mode. I get netflow packets either way.

                        It does appear that the collector system had to be online before the packets started going though.

                        Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                        Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                        Do not Chat/PM for help!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • D
                          donoreo
                          last edited by

                          What were you using as a collector?

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • jimpJ
                            jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                            last edited by

                            Nothing at the moment, just sending the packets at a random BSD VM.

                            Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                            Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                            Do not Chat/PM for help!

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • D
                              donoreo
                              last edited by

                              @jimp:

                              Nothing at the moment, just sending the packets at a random BSD VM.

                              Sorry, I thought you meant the collector software.  I have been sending to my own PC and still nothing.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • D
                                donoreo
                                last edited by

                                Softlowd is sending packets.

                                One question, the doc says this:

                                Launching softflowd

                                To launch softflowd at boot time, backup your configuration, and above the line, add the following line.
                                <shellcmd>softflowd -i em0 -v 5 -m 50000 -n 10.0.0.100:9999</shellcmd>

                                What file is it referring to?  I am not familiar enough with BSD, more of a Linux guy.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • jimpJ
                                  jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                                  last edited by

                                  Ignore that bit, install the shellcmd package and add it there. It's in the raw config.xml, and the shellcmd package can maintain that entry for you rather than editing the config xml manually.

                                  Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                                  Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                                  Do not Chat/PM for help!

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • C
                                    cmb
                                    last edited by

                                    The way some applications bind, they don't function entirely correctly with bridging unless the IP they're using is on the bridge itself (which is only supported in 2.0), I suspect that's what you're seeing here. The only thing I've seen to date that has issues in that scenario is nmap but other applications likely have the same issue.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.