Load Balance and Squid does not work runnig in the same server
-
rubic, its pfSense customized pf(4), by me. :)
This functionality can not be done with standard pf(4), at least the version that is used on FreeBSD, without too much tinkering.
-
@ermal:
rubic, its pfSense customized pf(4), by me. :)
This functionality can not be done with standard pf(4), at least the version that is used on FreeBSD, without too much tinkering.
Ok, now I see :) Thank you for your work!
translated: http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,34810.0.html -
Ok the guide works with FailOver, but for LoadBalance???? Thanks
-
Please, where I am testing the sense pf 2.0 is required to enter some sites that require https and when I configure squid with loadbalance the gateway connection changes every time, how can I fix this?
Please help.
-
Please help…Load balancing is ok...but squid is not functioning...please do some ups in the floating rule..
Thank you... -
well you could create a dedicated gateway group with failover (different tiers) and add a seperate rule for https traffic to use that gateway group …..
or you could enable 'sticky connections' in system .... but i don't know if that would solve all issues
-
Yes, BUT WITH THIS SOLUTION YOU CANT HAVP as parent for SQUID ;)
-
I Follow the same above procedure but no success,My browser just working working and working without showing any results.
my configurations are.My browser dosn't open any page after given settings ?????..Where I have take mistake. please guide me .
![2011-04-29, 11_55_27.jpg](/public/imported_attachments/1/2011-04-29, 11_55_27.jpg)
![2011-04-29, 11_55_27.jpg_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/2011-04-29, 11_55_27.jpg_thumb)
![2011-04-29, 11_55_32.jpg](/public/imported_attachments/1/2011-04-29, 11_55_32.jpg)
![2011-04-29, 11_55_32.jpg_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/2011-04-29, 11_55_32.jpg_thumb)
![2011-04-29, 11_55_42.jpg](/public/imported_attachments/1/2011-04-29, 11_55_42.jpg)
![2011-04-29, 11_55_42.jpg_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/2011-04-29, 11_55_42.jpg_thumb)
![2011-04-29, 11_55_47.jpg](/public/imported_attachments/1/2011-04-29, 11_55_47.jpg)
![2011-04-29, 11_55_47.jpg_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/2011-04-29, 11_55_47.jpg_thumb)
![2011-04-29, 11_56_02.jpg](/public/imported_attachments/1/2011-04-29, 11_56_02.jpg)
![2011-04-29, 11_56_02.jpg_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/2011-04-29, 11_56_02.jpg_thumb)
![2011-04-29, 11_56_10.jpg](/public/imported_attachments/1/2011-04-29, 11_56_10.jpg)
![2011-04-29, 11_56_10.jpg_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/2011-04-29, 11_56_10.jpg_thumb)
![2011-04-29, 11_56_33.jpg](/public/imported_attachments/1/2011-04-29, 11_56_33.jpg)
![2011-04-29, 11_56_33.jpg_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/2011-04-29, 11_56_33.jpg_thumb)
![2011-04-29, 11_57_39.jpg](/public/imported_attachments/1/2011-04-29, 11_57_39.jpg)
![2011-04-29, 11_57_39.jpg_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/2011-04-29, 11_57_39.jpg_thumb)
![2011-04-29, 11_57_49.jpg](/public/imported_attachments/1/2011-04-29, 11_57_49.jpg)
![2011-04-29, 11_57_49.jpg_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/2011-04-29, 11_57_49.jpg_thumb) -
@ far … your Nat ountbound should be set to "manual"
-
You need only loopback interface on squid selected.
Also on LAN the rule with a GatewayPool should not match the port 80/443 tcp which get handled by squid. -
Has anyone got failover working on 2.0RC3? I have been trying to get this working for several days now and and have not been successful.