Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Graph interpretation

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Traffic Shaping
    5 Posts 2 Posters 2.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • K
      kirlox_kitoy
      last edited by

      Can you give critics to this graph, thanks
      todusannew1.jpg
      todusannew1.jpg_thumb
      todusannew2.jpg
      todusannew2.jpg_thumb
      todusan3.jpg
      todusan3.jpg_thumb

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • D
        dusan
        last edited by

        Describe your WAN link or it would be hard to comment.

        Your qWANroot and qLANroot are too small for any practical need. If you have, say, symmetric 1 mbps link then qWANroot and qLANroot should be at least 800 kbps.

        qWANdef and qLANdef are too small. qWANack and qLANack are too large.

        Try the wizard, it should set the queues to some more reasonable value.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • K
          kirlox_kitoy
          last edited by

          It is the wizard configuration that set the values of 1 and 25 percent

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • K
            kirlox_kitoy
            last edited by

            My latest graph with my ISP's symmetric link 2Mbps.

            todusan5.jpg
            todusan5.jpg_thumb

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • D
              dusan
              last edited by

              @kirlox_kitoy:

              It is the wizard configuration that set the values of 1 and 25 percent

              I thought in 1.x the wizard sets default queues = 10% and ack queues = 10% (and 1% to the real-time bandwidth).

              Anyway qwandef=1% is too small to suppress qP2P (unless you don't want to) and qwanack=25% is much larger than necessary for a symmetric link. I would prefer something like 5%-20% and 5%-10%, respectively.

              Graphs tell you nothing about accuracy of the shaper. Queue loads should be calculated from systematic measurements with pftop.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • First post
                Last post
              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.