Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Possibly overkill using pfsense?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Captive Portal
    15 Posts 8 Posters 7.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Cry HavokC
      Cry Havok
      last edited by

      A quick search found this old thread which suggests that it won't work in 1.2.3.  I don't know about 2.0.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M
        militarymedic23
        last edited by

        hmm… would this be the point were m0n0 may have this type of functionality working?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • N
          nzbreser
          last edited by

          Looking at your request there isn't alot of real detail so I won't assume or offer relative answers however
          psfsense Captive portal can work well if setup correctly.
          Networking features natting/dhcp/routing/vlans all work with captive portal in place.
          Captive portal offers 3 types of authentication passthrough/local db/radius. In passthrough you still need to setup f/w rules
          to prevent or allow traffic to pass. With the others you have to have a client dns entry pointing to your pfsense for the splash page to
          work.
          Captive portal is limited in functionality as compared with mikrotik and others; so the decision is commercial as well as functional.
          If your offering hotspot services then pfsense will be limited; however if provisioning straight access alone then suitable.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • E
            eri--
            last edited by

            @nzbreser
            what is missing from mikrotik in CP?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • savagoS
              savago
              last edited by

              @ermal:

              @nzbreser
              what is missing from mikrotik in CP?

              Maybe this one,pfSense do not support remote disconnection using POD packets, instead it is using
              reauthentication (Reauthenticate connected users every minute,i think there must be options 1/5/10 min)

              Sys 2.0-RC1: Intel Atom N330 Dual Core @1.6 2048M Ram 40GHD

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • J
                joe_adk
                last edited by

                i think there must be options 1/5/10 min

                This would be a very welcome addition, at least for me.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • L
                  lsoltero
                  last edited by

                  to set the re-authentication interval edit /etc/inc/captiveportal.inc and change it to whatever you want.

                  /* initialize minicron interval value */
                                  $croninterval = $config['captiveportal']['croninterval'] ? $config['captiveportal']['croninterval'] : 60;

                  /* double check if the $croninterval is numeric and at least 10 seconds. If not we set it to 60 to avoid problems */
                                  if ((!is_numeric($croninterval)) || ($croninterval < 10)) { $croninterval = 60; }

                  note that you can also set it in config.xml but there is no gui to do this for you.  Either way works.

                  –luis

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • E
                    eri--
                    last edited by

                    You can set this on the gui

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • savagoS
                      savago
                      last edited by

                      @ermal:

                      You can set this on the gui

                      Where is located this options ?

                      Sys 2.0-RC1: Intel Atom N330 Dual Core @1.6 2048M Ram 40GHD

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • savagoS
                        savago
                        last edited by

                        UP

                        Sys 2.0-RC1: Intel Atom N330 Dual Core @1.6 2048M Ram 40GHD

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.