Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Best option for a site-site VPN?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.0-RC Snapshot Feedback and Problems - RETIRED
    14 Posts 8 Posters 4.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • F
      focalguy
      last edited by

      OpenVPN seems to be a good one. I use them regularly and it's pretty rock solid. Look in the wiki if you need instructions.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • luckman212L
        luckman212 LAYER 8
        last edited by

        Cool, that's what I was thinking too.  Just wanted a little confirmation.  Will try to set it up.  I've done client-server OpenVPN setups but never a site-site.  My remote site is a dual-wan (failover, not round robin) setup- what will happen to the  VPN if the primary wan goes down?  does pfSense automatically try to re-establish the tunnel over the 2nd gateway?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • F
          focalguy
          last edited by

          Site to site is still client server. Set the server to be the one that won't change and the client may connect any way it can. I've never done that so I'm speculating.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • G
            grazman
            last edited by

            ipsec is what I use for site-to-site with pfsense mostly. I use openvpn or ppptp for remote users, depending on the needs for the organizational users.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • luckman212L
              luckman212 LAYER 8
              last edited by

              hmm - curious why you chose IPSEC over ovpn for site-site, could you elaborate at all?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • H
                hec
                last edited by

                Ipsec can only be used if you have only one subnet. In other cases you need openvpn.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • luckman212L
                  luckman212 LAYER 8
                  last edited by

                  Hmm, ok.  Well yes each site has just  1 subnet (and they are unique) so that should work, right?  Is an IPSEC site-site connection somehow more durable/faster/easier to set up than ovpn?  or- what is the reason you prefer it, out of curiosity

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • G
                    Gloom
                    last edited by

                    We have OpenVPN site to site, one of them is  mobile and uses satellite as it's primary and 3G as a fall back if they can't get a lock. Works fine and fails over transparently if you set you gateway groups up to fail over rather than load balance.

                    Never underestimate the power of human stupidity

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • P
                      phospher
                      last edited by

                      I've run both and I've had much better success with OpenVPN. A lot more reliable from my personal experiences.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • luckman212L
                        luckman212 LAYER 8
                        last edited by

                        Thanks again for the advice guys.  Since I've some previous experience with OpenVPN I think based on the feedback here that I'll at least give that a try first.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • C
                          cmb
                          last edited by

                          "It depends". There's in depth discussion of the options and the best choice depending on specifics in http://pfsense.org/book which is no different in 2.0.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • F
                            focalguy
                            last edited by

                            I had about 20 sites using ipsec and changed them all to openvpn. It's been much more reliable for me.

                            The book is a great investment if you want to go more in depth.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • D
                              dave99
                              last edited by

                              As I've replaced hardware firewalls at remote sites with pfsense, I've moved tunnels from ipsec to openvpn. Both work well, but for me, every now and then I'd get ipsec tunnels that seemed to get out of sync, and refuse to connect for somewhat lengthy periods of time (anywhere from 10 minutes to a couple hours), to the point I'd have to reboot both boxes to force a connection. And no numbers to back it up, but openvpn tends to feel a little faster than ipsec - might be the compression that is enabled.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.