How to: Get CPU temp
-
This is awesome. My i3-540 reads 29C, 29C, 36C, 36C lol.
Will this be included in future snapshots? Or should we go ahead and modify it ourselves?
That is cool, which type of case/box you use? I get 54C with an Atom D510 that sits in a Jetway Motherboard that is in a passive cooled M-350 box.
Cheers Steen -
Though this is 2.0 RC feedback section, but since the topic is on coretemp, I wanted to see if there is a pfsense 1.2.3 compatible 32-bit coretemp file out there that I can use. Moved to 1.2.3 last night as 64-bit snapshot snort is broken since weeks and I don't have the patience to wait any longer.
-
Though this is 2.0 RC feedback section, but since the topic is on coretemp, I wanted to see if there is a pfsense 1.2.3 compatible 32-bit coretemp file out there that I can use. Moved to 1.2.3 last night as 64-bit snapshot snort is broken since weeks and I don't have the patience to wait any longer.
Pull the file from a FreeBSD 7.2 install CD.
-
I am not a FreeBSD user.
-
I am not a FreeBSD user.
you don't have to be a FreeBSD user to copy a file off the install CD.
download a copy of 7.1 Install ISO.. Mount the ISO with your favorite Virtual CD program, like MagicISO… Then copy the files from cddrive/boot/kernel
-
I'm downloading the 7.2 ISO right now and I will upload the file as soon as it's done. ;)
-
Why on earth would you downgrade to 1.2.3 just because 2.0 x64 doesn't work? Why not use 2.0 x32? It works fine.
-
To be honest, I find 1.2.3 a bit more stable and far more responsive than 2.0RC3. It maybe just me, but after trying RC snapshots since as early as Jan this year, I have started to like 1.2.3 better and despite trying the latest RC3 snapshots from time to time, I keep coming back to 1.2.3.
-
To be honest, I find 1.2.3 a bit more stable and far more responsive than 2.0RC3. It maybe just me, […]
It's just you. :-)
-
Coretemp.ko for 1.2.3 attached below, rename to Coretemp.ko
-
-
jimp,
you twisted my words or you read it incorrectly.I said "it may be just me" but I like 1.2.3 better than 2.0 despite trying the latest snapshots from time to time.
Also 1.2.3 HAS been extremely stable and responsive for me.
-
RedRep .. Thank you !!
-
can this be included by default in nanobsd snaps?
-
-
It still needs some additional code to allow it to be switched on/off or to auto detect it in order to prevent it showing some ugly error on machines without the correct hardware/driver.
Steve
-
It still needs some additional code to allow it to be switched on/off or to auto detect it in order to prevent it showing some ugly error on machines without the correct hardware/driver.
Steve
Hi Steve!
How you are :)
Yes, fully understood and not expected by "tomorrow" if you understand what I mean.
Maybe in form of a package, then one can install if ones HW/drivers support one can install.
Cheers Steen -
can this be included by default in nanobsd snaps?
It isn't even on the full snaps by default, so probably not.
If/when it's a package it should be possible to use on both.
-
So.. has consideration been given to add this package to the snapshots?
-
As stated before, it wouldn't make it into snapshots. A package is not "in the snapshots" it's in the package system. If someone can make a package from this, that would be great, but so far it doesn't appear that anyone has had the time or inclination to do so.
