Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Quad port PCI-express

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    15 Posts 5 Posters 9.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • M Offline
      mikeg
      last edited by

      If the superMicro X7SPA has a PCIe 2.0 bus, I doubt that the Intel EXPI9404PT will work in it.  See this Intel notice.  The notice recommends either EXPI9404PTL or E1G44ET for PCIe 2.0 bus.  I've seen comments that some lots of the EXPI9404PTL are also problematic, so I went with the E1G44ET.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J Offline
        jasonlitka
        last edited by

        Interesting.  I've not used the full-size PT adapters in a while, but I swear I had one installed in a system with a 2.0 bus.  Maybe that's why they say "may".

        I can break anything.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • D Offline
          Davec
          last edited by

          Dear Jason Litka,

          I had my Supermicro with the same problems like what you said. The Motherboard and the Nic card are both from Supermicro and it does not fix the Right angle riser. I had contact with Supermicro and they have no luck in helping out. At the end, I purchased another Intel Quard Nic card and fixed the problems with the flexible pci-e cable. It was a nightmare.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • A Offline
            amrogers3
            last edited by

            @Davec:

            Dear Jason Litka,

            I had my Supermicro with the same problems like what you said. The Motherboard and the Nic card are both from Supermicro and it does not fix the Right angle riser. I had contact with Supermicro and they have no luck in helping out. At the end, I purchased another Intel Quard Nic card and fixed the problems with the flexible pci-e cable. It was a nightmare.

            Davec, can you list what case, motherboard, NIC, and riser you used? I have a similar problem (see post http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=39990.new;topicseen#new)

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • M Offline
              malon123
              last edited by

              Why not E1G44HT? These are newer, cooler and saves energy with better specs!

              Just bought one on eBay under $250

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • J Offline
                jasonlitka
                last edited by

                @malon123:

                Why not E1G44HT? These are newer, cooler and saves energy with better specs!

                Just bought one on eBay under $250

                Because, the 82580 cards aren't supported unless you compile the driver yourself on a dev box and then copy it over to your production system, at least not last time I tested it.

                I can break anything.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • M Offline
                  malon123
                  last edited by

                  @Jason:

                  @malon123:

                  Why not E1G44HT? These are newer, cooler and saves energy with better specs!

                  Just bought one on eBay under $250

                  Because, the 82580 cards aren't supported unless you compile the driver yourself on a dev box and then copy it over to your production system, at least not last time I tested it.

                  Oops… looks I need to return it before I get it

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • M Offline
                    mikeg
                    last edited by

                    FWIW, I'm running an 82580-based E1G44ET in stock pfSense 2.0-RC3.  However, it's an older card, and maybe there are other reasons why the E1G44HT won't work.  Also, I'm curious why E1G44HT prices seem lower than E1G44ET prices.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • J Offline
                      jasonlitka
                      last edited by

                      @mikeg:

                      FWIW, I'm running an 82580-based E1G44ET in stock pfSense 2.0-RC3.  However, it's an older card, and maybe there are other reasons why the E1G44HT won't work.  Also, I'm curious why E1G44HT prices seem lower than E1G44ET prices.

                      The E1G44ET is based on a pair of 82576, not the 82580.

                      The E1G44HT is less expensive because it uses the 82580EB which is a native 4-port chip, making the design a lot simpler.  The previous quads were actually two dual-port chips.

                      I can break anything.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • M Offline
                        mikeg
                        last edited by

                        @Jason:

                        @mikeg:

                        FWIW, I'm running an 82580-based E1G44ET in stock pfSense 2.0-RC3.  However, it's an older card, and maybe there are other reasons why the E1G44HT won't work.  Also, I'm curious why E1G44HT prices seem lower than E1G44ET prices.

                        The E1G44ET is based on a pair of 82576, not the 82580.

                        The E1G44HT is less expensive because it uses the 82580EB which is a native 4-port chip, making the design a lot simpler.  The previous quads were actually two dual-port chips.

                        Thank you.  I obviously didn't read the documentation very carefully  :-[

                        So, do we know when the 82580 cards will be supported?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • J Offline
                          jasonlitka
                          last edited by

                          @mikeg:

                          @Jason:

                          @mikeg:

                          FWIW, I'm running an 82580-based E1G44ET in stock pfSense 2.0-RC3.  However, it's an older card, and maybe there are other reasons why the E1G44HT won't work.  Also, I'm curious why E1G44HT prices seem lower than E1G44ET prices.

                          The E1G44ET is based on a pair of 82576, not the 82580.

                          The E1G44HT is less expensive because it uses the 82580EB which is a native 4-port chip, making the design a lot simpler.  The previous quads were actually two dual-port chips.

                          Thank you.  I obviously didn't read the documentation very carefully  :-[

                          So, do we know when the 82580 cards will be supported?
                          [/quote]

                          As of 9.0 it's still not supported, at least not in the hardware notes.  The driver compile is actually pretty easy though.

                          http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,26592.msg140323.html#msg140323

                          I can break anything.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.