Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Custom Bandwidths are greater than 30%.

    Traffic Shaping
    3
    4
    4.6k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S
      serialdie
      last edited by

      Ok so i am at a lost. The wizard is pretty straight forward EXCEPT that there is now way to understand how is the traffic shaper calculating bandwidth % on its own…

      I keep getting this message

      "Custom Bandwidths are greater than 30%. Please lower them for the wizard to continue."

      All I want to do is give priority to my voip and everything else to lower.

      How can I get past this message?

      TIA!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • D
        dreamslacker
        last edited by

        Do as stated.  Lower the bandwidth first and continue with the wizard.

        You can always amend the figure after the queues are created by adjusting qVoip realtime and bandwidth settings.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S
          serialdie
          last edited by

          @dreamslacker:

          Do as stated.  Lower the bandwidth first and continue with the wizard.

          You can always amend the figure after the queues are created by adjusting qVoip realtime and bandwidth settings.

          If I do that than I get the following error:

          
          There were error(s) loading the rules: pfctl: bandwidth for qVoIP higher than parent/tmp/rules.debug:43: errors in queue definition pfctl: Syntax error in config file: pf rules not loaded - The line in question reads [ bandwidth for qVoIP higher than parent /tmp/rules.debug]
          
          
          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • F
            focalguy
            last edited by

            Sounds like it's not quite the same issue but possibly reading this post may help you:
            http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,32833.0.html

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • First post
              Last post
            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.