Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    PFSense 2.0 - Not able to bridge tap VPN.

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved OpenVPN
    31 Posts 12 Posters 16.4k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • X
      xhark
      last edited by

      this issue will be fixed in the next release?

      SysNetAdmin & Blogger on http://blogmotion.fr

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • F
        firbc
        last edited by

        @nooblet:

        Try going to 'Interfaces' > 'assign' and create an interface for 'ovpns1'

        Then enable it under the interface drop down list, then go back to assign interfaces and you should be able to bridge the LAN and OVPN interfaces

        See attached screenshots, let me know if it works.

        Also for my bridged client setup I had to modify the /var/etc/openvpn/server1.conf

        dev ovpns2
        dev-type tap
        dev-node /dev/tap2
        writepid /var/run/openvpn_server2.pid
        #user nobody
        #group nobody
        script-security 3
        daemon
        keepalive 10 60
        ping-timer-rem
        persist-tun
        persist-key
        proto udp
        cipher AES-128-CBC
        up /usr/local/sbin/ovpn-linkup
        down /usr/local/sbin/ovpn-linkdown
        local x.x.x.x
        tls-server
        mode server   <–---removed 'server x.x.x.x'
        client-config-dir /var/etc/openvpn-csc
        lport 1195
        management /var/etc/openvpn/server2.sock unix
        ca /var/etc/openvpn/server2.ca
        cert /var/etc/openvpn/server2.cert
        key /var/etc/openvpn/server2.key
        dh /etc/dh-parameters.1024
        tls-auth /var/etc/openvpn/server2.tls-auth 0

        how did you set mode "server  <–---removed 'server x.x.x.x'" to stay in config after reboot?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J
          Jarpse
          last edited by

          This might be a slight kick, but did you try a (bogus) /30 subnet on the TAP? Don't forget to bridge the interface and allow traffic on the created OPT interface (Which you need to create a bridge, anyway).

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • jimpJ
            jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
            last edited by

            The code for tap on 2.0 is a bit broken. I fixed it up and it's now working on 2.1.

            https://github.com/bsdperimeter/pfsense/commit/1ab6bdb5ffcf052241f58af87efef9fe077b38c7
            https://github.com/bsdperimeter/pfsense/commit/74a556a3caa67adb0adac055ffb9321e264e1b71

            Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

            Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

            Do not Chat/PM for help!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S
              sbeaudoin
              last edited by

              Sorry to all, but I did not have time to try your suggestions.  I think i will wait until 2.1 is released if it is not too far.  Any date yet?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • jimpJ
                jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                last edited by

                No idea, probably on the order of 4-6+ months.

                It wouldn't be hard to adapt those changes to 2.0.1 but I'm not sure if the impact of the change would be considered too large to pull back from 2.1, considering we're trying to get 2.0.1 out in just a few days time.

                Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                Do not Chat/PM for help!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • J
                  Jarpse
                  last edited by

                  Please, do try to get it in 2.0.1. The changes in the two files don't seem like they break machines or vpns when you update 'em to 2.0.1, or do they? ;-) As the code for tun interfaces stays the same.

                  Quite a few people have problems with the tap interface. I would be really grateful if it'd be fixed in 2.0.1.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • T
                    tugi
                    last edited by

                    Hi!

                    Have you seen it? - http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/OpenVPN_Bridging

                    I have successfully setup bridge between LAN and tap on the 2.0 version.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • S
                      sbeaudoin
                      last edited by

                      No, but you have seen the following, I suppose :

                      _Caveat - There are some problems with the setup described here, this is currently being refactored.

                      THIS CANNOT BE USED ON 2.0._

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • T
                        tugi
                        last edited by

                        Yes, But it works fine on 2.0  :)

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • G
                          ghowey
                          last edited by

                          Can we get our hands on version 2.1?

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • jimpJ
                            jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                            last edited by

                            You can install the tap fix patch package I put up for 2.0 (though it needs updating… not so easy as the fixes don't merge cleanly from 2.1), and if you want 2.1 you can use gitsync to get the code, check the doc wiki for instructions.

                            Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                            Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                            Do not Chat/PM for help!

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • G
                              ghowey
                              last edited by

                              Ah, I did not realize that you had added a Tap Fix Package for OpenVPN. It is now installed! Thank You, and Thanks for pfSense.
                              It does everything I need for my SOHO Gateway and more, with minimal resources!

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • D
                                dig1234
                                last edited by

                                I've got that fix package installed and indeed it makes smart changes to the GUI, but still no dice for me.  I cannot for the life of me get pings to work from the clients. I know the tunnel is working because I can actually see some layer 2 traffic going across the tunnel (ARP broadcasts, multicasts) with tcpdump. But pinging etc will not work even to the pfsense box itself. It feels like a firewall issue but I've got allow * rules on all interfaces including the OPT1 bridge.
                                Been struggling with this for a week any suggestions?
                                Here is my tap config:

                                tap.jpg
                                tap.jpg_thumb

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • jimpJ
                                  jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                                  last edited by

                                  Show the output of "ifconfig -a"

                                  Also if you switched between tun/tap on an existing connection, you must reboot. An unfortunate fact of dealing with tap interfaces.

                                  New connections should be fine for that, you just need to make sure they're assigned and bridged to LAN on both sides.

                                  Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                                  Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                                  Do not Chat/PM for help!

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • D
                                    dig1234
                                    last edited by

                                    Here is the output (note:the lan iface is dot1q trunked into the switch.)

                                    em0: flags=8943 <up,broadcast,running,promisc,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 150                                                                                                0
                                            options=9b <rxcsum,txcsum,vlan_mtu,vlan_hwtagging,vlan_hwcsum>ether 00:0c:29:af:78:7e
                                            inet6 fe80::20c:29ff:feaf:787e%em0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
                                            inet 10.0.1.253 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.1.255
                                            nd6 options=3 <performnud,accept_rtadv>media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
                                            status: active
                                    plip0: flags=8810 <pointopoint,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                                    lo0: flags=8049 <up,loopback,running,multicast>metric 0 mtu 16384
                                            options=3 <rxcsum,txcsum>inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000
                                            inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
                                            inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3
                                            nd6 options=3 <performnud,accept_rtadv>pfsync0: flags=0<> metric 0 mtu 1460
                                            syncpeer: 224.0.0.240 maxupd: 128 syncok: 1
                                    pflog0: flags=100 <promisc>metric 0 mtu 33200
                                    enc0: flags=0<> metric 0 mtu 1536
                                    em0_vlan2: flags=8943 <up,broadcast,running,promisc,simplex,multicast>metric 0 m                                                                                                tu 1500
                                            options=3 <rxcsum,txcsum>ether 00:0c:29:af:78:7e
                                            inet6 fe80::20c:29ff:feaf:787e%em0_vlan2 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x7
                                            inet 10.0.6.253 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.6.255
                                            nd6 options=3 <performnud,accept_rtadv>media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
                                            status: active
                                            vlan: 2 parent interface: em0
                                    bridge0: flags=8843 <up,broadcast,running,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                                            ether f2:39:a5:31:42:98
                                            id 00:00:00:00:00:00 priority 32768 hellotime 2 fwddelay 15
                                            maxage 20 holdcnt 6 proto rstp maxaddr 100 timeout 1200
                                            root id 00:00:00:00:00:00 priority 32768 ifcost 0 port 0
                                            member: ovpns1 flags=143 <learning,discover,autoedge,autoptp>ifmaxaddr 0 port 9 priority 128 path cost 2000000
                                            member: em0_vlan2 flags=143 <learning,discover,autoedge,autoptp>ifmaxaddr 0 port 7 priority 128 path cost 20000
                                    ovpns1: flags=8943 <up,broadcast,running,promisc,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu                                                                                                  1500
                                            options=80000 <linkstate>ether 00:bd:39:07:00:01
                                            inet6 fe80::2bd:39ff:fe07:1%ovpns1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x9
                                            nd6 options=3 <performnud,accept_rtadv>Opened by PID 48350
                                    ovpns3: flags=8051 <up,pointopoint,running,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                                            options=80000 <linkstate>inet6 fe80::20c:29ff:feaf:787e%ovpns3 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xa
                                            inet 10.0.7.1 –> 10.0.7.2 netmask 0xffffffff
                                            nd6 options=3 <performnud,accept_rtadv>Opened by PID 13380
                                    tun1: flags=8010 <pointopoint,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                                            options=80000 <linkstate>pptpd0: flags=8890 <pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                                    pptpd1: flags=8890 <pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                                    pptpd2: flags=8890 <pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                                    pptpd3: flags=8890 <pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                                    pptpd4: flags=8890 <pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                                    pptpd5: flags=8890 <pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                                    pptpd6: flags=8890 <pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                                    pptpd7: flags=8890 <pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                                    pptpd8: flags=8890 <pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                                    pptpd9: flags=8890 <pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                                    pptpd10: flags=8890 <pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                                    pptpd11: flags=8890 <pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                                    pptpd12: flags=8890 <pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                                    pptpd13: flags=8890 <pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                                    pptpd14: flags=8890 <pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                                    pptpd15: flags=8890 <pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500</pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast></pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast></pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast></pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast></pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast></pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast></pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast></pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast></pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast></pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast></pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast></pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast></pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast></pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast></pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast></pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast></linkstate></pointopoint,multicast></performnud,accept_rtadv></linkstate></up,pointopoint,running,multicast></performnud,accept_rtadv></linkstate></up,broadcast,running,promisc,simplex,multicast></learning,discover,autoedge,autoptp></learning,discover,autoedge,autoptp></up,broadcast,running,simplex,multicast></full-duplex></performnud,accept_rtadv></rxcsum,txcsum></up,broadcast,running,promisc,simplex,multicast></promisc></performnud,accept_rtadv></rxcsum,txcsum></up,loopback,running,multicast></pointopoint,simplex,multicast></full-duplex></performnud,accept_rtadv></rxcsum,txcsum,vlan_mtu,vlan_hwtagging,vlan_hwcsum></up,broadcast,running,promisc,simplex,multicast>

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • jimpJ
                                      jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                                      last edited by

                                      That appears to be OK at a glance. Looks about like my VM test setup that works (though it doesn't use vlans)

                                      Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                                      Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                                      Do not Chat/PM for help!

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • D
                                        dig1234
                                        last edited by

                                        that's exactly what it is, if this works then I get to buy me real hardware to use for pfSense. The vlan part of it works fine, I can ping on lan etc. But what to do about TAP?! driving me crazy.
                                        How can I test firewall rules?

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • jimpJ
                                          jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                                          last edited by

                                          Set the rules you have to log - if the packets hit the rule and log as being passed, then firewall rules are not your problem.

                                          Doing captures on the tap interface on both ends while you try can help.

                                          Is this a site-to-site or are you bridging in remote access clients?

                                          Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                                          Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                                          Do not Chat/PM for help!

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • D
                                            dig1234
                                            last edited by

                                            Ok- I solved it. There is a problem with bridging the vlan interface. Either a bug or a incompatibility. I noticed a message on the console something to the effect of problem adding the vlan-iface to bridge0. (I had only been using ssh so hadn't seen the message) So I switched off a vlan interface to a real one and all was copacetic. Too many variables makes for a tough diagnosis.. Thanks for your help!

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.