Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    PFSense 2.0 - Not able to bridge tap VPN.

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved OpenVPN
    31 Posts 12 Posters 16.7k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S
      sbeaudoin
      last edited by

      No, but you have seen the following, I suppose :

      _Caveat - There are some problems with the setup described here, this is currently being refactored.

      THIS CANNOT BE USED ON 2.0._

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • T
        tugi
        last edited by

        Yes, But it works fine on 2.0  :)

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • G
          ghowey
          last edited by

          Can we get our hands on version 2.1?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • jimpJ
            jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
            last edited by

            You can install the tap fix patch package I put up for 2.0 (though it needs updating… not so easy as the fixes don't merge cleanly from 2.1), and if you want 2.1 you can use gitsync to get the code, check the doc wiki for instructions.

            Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

            Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

            Do not Chat/PM for help!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • G
              ghowey
              last edited by

              Ah, I did not realize that you had added a Tap Fix Package for OpenVPN. It is now installed! Thank You, and Thanks for pfSense.
              It does everything I need for my SOHO Gateway and more, with minimal resources!

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • D
                dig1234
                last edited by

                I've got that fix package installed and indeed it makes smart changes to the GUI, but still no dice for me.  I cannot for the life of me get pings to work from the clients. I know the tunnel is working because I can actually see some layer 2 traffic going across the tunnel (ARP broadcasts, multicasts) with tcpdump. But pinging etc will not work even to the pfsense box itself. It feels like a firewall issue but I've got allow * rules on all interfaces including the OPT1 bridge.
                Been struggling with this for a week any suggestions?
                Here is my tap config:

                tap.jpg
                tap.jpg_thumb

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • jimpJ
                  jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                  last edited by

                  Show the output of "ifconfig -a"

                  Also if you switched between tun/tap on an existing connection, you must reboot. An unfortunate fact of dealing with tap interfaces.

                  New connections should be fine for that, you just need to make sure they're assigned and bridged to LAN on both sides.

                  Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                  Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                  Do not Chat/PM for help!

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • D
                    dig1234
                    last edited by

                    Here is the output (note:the lan iface is dot1q trunked into the switch.)

                    em0: flags=8943 <up,broadcast,running,promisc,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 150                                                                                                0
                            options=9b <rxcsum,txcsum,vlan_mtu,vlan_hwtagging,vlan_hwcsum>ether 00:0c:29:af:78:7e
                            inet6 fe80::20c:29ff:feaf:787e%em0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
                            inet 10.0.1.253 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.1.255
                            nd6 options=3 <performnud,accept_rtadv>media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
                            status: active
                    plip0: flags=8810 <pointopoint,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                    lo0: flags=8049 <up,loopback,running,multicast>metric 0 mtu 16384
                            options=3 <rxcsum,txcsum>inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000
                            inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
                            inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3
                            nd6 options=3 <performnud,accept_rtadv>pfsync0: flags=0<> metric 0 mtu 1460
                            syncpeer: 224.0.0.240 maxupd: 128 syncok: 1
                    pflog0: flags=100 <promisc>metric 0 mtu 33200
                    enc0: flags=0<> metric 0 mtu 1536
                    em0_vlan2: flags=8943 <up,broadcast,running,promisc,simplex,multicast>metric 0 m                                                                                                tu 1500
                            options=3 <rxcsum,txcsum>ether 00:0c:29:af:78:7e
                            inet6 fe80::20c:29ff:feaf:787e%em0_vlan2 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x7
                            inet 10.0.6.253 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.6.255
                            nd6 options=3 <performnud,accept_rtadv>media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
                            status: active
                            vlan: 2 parent interface: em0
                    bridge0: flags=8843 <up,broadcast,running,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                            ether f2:39:a5:31:42:98
                            id 00:00:00:00:00:00 priority 32768 hellotime 2 fwddelay 15
                            maxage 20 holdcnt 6 proto rstp maxaddr 100 timeout 1200
                            root id 00:00:00:00:00:00 priority 32768 ifcost 0 port 0
                            member: ovpns1 flags=143 <learning,discover,autoedge,autoptp>ifmaxaddr 0 port 9 priority 128 path cost 2000000
                            member: em0_vlan2 flags=143 <learning,discover,autoedge,autoptp>ifmaxaddr 0 port 7 priority 128 path cost 20000
                    ovpns1: flags=8943 <up,broadcast,running,promisc,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu                                                                                                  1500
                            options=80000 <linkstate>ether 00:bd:39:07:00:01
                            inet6 fe80::2bd:39ff:fe07:1%ovpns1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x9
                            nd6 options=3 <performnud,accept_rtadv>Opened by PID 48350
                    ovpns3: flags=8051 <up,pointopoint,running,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                            options=80000 <linkstate>inet6 fe80::20c:29ff:feaf:787e%ovpns3 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xa
                            inet 10.0.7.1 –> 10.0.7.2 netmask 0xffffffff
                            nd6 options=3 <performnud,accept_rtadv>Opened by PID 13380
                    tun1: flags=8010 <pointopoint,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                            options=80000 <linkstate>pptpd0: flags=8890 <pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                    pptpd1: flags=8890 <pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                    pptpd2: flags=8890 <pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                    pptpd3: flags=8890 <pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                    pptpd4: flags=8890 <pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                    pptpd5: flags=8890 <pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                    pptpd6: flags=8890 <pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                    pptpd7: flags=8890 <pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                    pptpd8: flags=8890 <pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                    pptpd9: flags=8890 <pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                    pptpd10: flags=8890 <pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                    pptpd11: flags=8890 <pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                    pptpd12: flags=8890 <pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                    pptpd13: flags=8890 <pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                    pptpd14: flags=8890 <pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                    pptpd15: flags=8890 <pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500</pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast></pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast></pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast></pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast></pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast></pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast></pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast></pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast></pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast></pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast></pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast></pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast></pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast></pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast></pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast></pointopoint,noarp,simplex,multicast></linkstate></pointopoint,multicast></performnud,accept_rtadv></linkstate></up,pointopoint,running,multicast></performnud,accept_rtadv></linkstate></up,broadcast,running,promisc,simplex,multicast></learning,discover,autoedge,autoptp></learning,discover,autoedge,autoptp></up,broadcast,running,simplex,multicast></full-duplex></performnud,accept_rtadv></rxcsum,txcsum></up,broadcast,running,promisc,simplex,multicast></promisc></performnud,accept_rtadv></rxcsum,txcsum></up,loopback,running,multicast></pointopoint,simplex,multicast></full-duplex></performnud,accept_rtadv></rxcsum,txcsum,vlan_mtu,vlan_hwtagging,vlan_hwcsum></up,broadcast,running,promisc,simplex,multicast>

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • jimpJ
                      jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                      last edited by

                      That appears to be OK at a glance. Looks about like my VM test setup that works (though it doesn't use vlans)

                      Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                      Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                      Do not Chat/PM for help!

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • D
                        dig1234
                        last edited by

                        that's exactly what it is, if this works then I get to buy me real hardware to use for pfSense. The vlan part of it works fine, I can ping on lan etc. But what to do about TAP?! driving me crazy.
                        How can I test firewall rules?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • jimpJ
                          jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                          last edited by

                          Set the rules you have to log - if the packets hit the rule and log as being passed, then firewall rules are not your problem.

                          Doing captures on the tap interface on both ends while you try can help.

                          Is this a site-to-site or are you bridging in remote access clients?

                          Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                          Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                          Do not Chat/PM for help!

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • D
                            dig1234
                            last edited by

                            Ok- I solved it. There is a problem with bridging the vlan interface. Either a bug or a incompatibility. I noticed a message on the console something to the effect of problem adding the vlan-iface to bridge0. (I had only been using ssh so hadn't seen the message) So I switched off a vlan interface to a real one and all was copacetic. Too many variables makes for a tough diagnosis.. Thanks for your help!

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • S
                              sbeaudoin
                              last edited by

                              Tugi, I tried your suggestion, but now, OpenVPN do not want to start with "–server and --server-bridge cannot be used together".  How did you overcome this?

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • S
                                sbeaudoin
                                last edited by

                                Forget it, I installed the OpenVPN patch and it works great!  Thank you.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • M
                                  mglm22
                                  last edited by

                                  Hi,

                                  Thanks to Jimp for the ovpn bridge fixes in 2.1 which worked great in my testing.  (Spent a lot of time trying to get 2.0 and 2.0.1 to work but never succeded).

                                  Is there or will there be a way to specify the client IP address connecting to the OVPN bridge in the GUI?  I currently use this for some clients whose IP address must remain static on the bridge.  I am guessing I could put the ifconfig-pool-persist directive in the advanced configuration but was wondering where the file (with the respective client to IP address) the directive points to should be saved?

                                  2.1-DEVELOPMENT (i386)
                                  built on Fri Nov 25 17:45:38 EST 2011
                                  FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p6

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • jimpJ
                                    jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                                    last edited by

                                    Probably would work with something to make the IP static in a client-specific override entry. Not sure what it would be offhand for a tap IP, but I thought it was supported (I know it is for tun, but the syntax is likely different)

                                    Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                                    Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                                    Do not Chat/PM for help!

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.