Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Panic with possible solution.

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.0-RC Snapshot Feedback and Problems - RETIRED
    7 Posts 3 Posters 3.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • cyber7C Offline
      cyber7
      last edited by

      Hi Guys (Please see the attached panic screenshots I had this morning after upgrading to today - 17-02-11 - snapshot)

      Background:
      I initially ran the pfSense Firewall on a VMware Server (ESXi), but decided to move this onto a dedicated server.  This was due to the fact that I started over-utilizing the ESXi box and had to do the move.  Since installing the new server, I have not been able to run for more than a 24hour period without a panic.  Yesterday, I started getting deadlocks on the system, which started me questioning the hardware itself.  (Memory, normally the culprit.)

      At the same time:
      My TELECOMS (Telkom SA, not my ISP, MWEB) started having problems on the DIGINET HARDWARE driven by the exchange and delivering my connection.  This caused mass confusion where to start looking at the problem, as now it could be HARDWARE, SOFTWARE or the LINE itself!  I also started getting MESSAGE 324 errors when opening HTTPS sites at my users, so all in all a mass mess.

      What I did find:
      Setting the MTU on the interfaces on the network to 1492 (default 1500) solved the 324 error. (MTU Missmatch)

      So, is it not possible the errors (panics) I got was due to a miss-matched MTU?

      I will keep an eye on this and report back.

      Kind Regards
      Aubrey Kloppers
      1.jpg
      1.jpg_thumb
      2.jpg
      2.jpg_thumb

      When you pause to think, do you start again?

      2.2.4-RELEASE (amd64)
      built on Sat Jul 25 19:57:37 CDT 2015
      FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p15
      and
      pfSense 2.3.2-RELEASE-p1 (amd64 full-install) on pfSense

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • cyber7C Offline
        cyber7
        last edited by

        Further on this:

        I see the
        plip0: mtu 1500
        enc0: mtu 1536
        pfsync0: mtu 1460

        Is it not possible that this could be part of the problem?
        just my 10c

        Kind regards
        Aubrey

        When you pause to think, do you start again?

        2.2.4-RELEASE (amd64)
        built on Sat Jul 25 19:57:37 CDT 2015
        FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p15
        and
        pfSense 2.3.2-RELEASE-p1 (amd64 full-install) on pfSense

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • cyber7C Offline
          cyber7
          last edited by

          even further on this:
          (Possable DHCP fix…)

          from: http://www.debianhelp.co.uk/mtu.htm
          <start>It seems that the dhcp clients are not configured by default to do the same for dynamically-assigned configurations . So, you need to use a tweak to achieve the same. We're going to use the pre-up feature of /etc/network/interfaces like this:

          iface eth0 inet dhcp
          hostname "mymachine"
          name LAN Interface
          pre-up /sbin/ifconfig $IFACE mtu 1492
          <end>Looking at this, it seems something has changed in the code of pfSense.  (Nic Drivers?)  I sould like to see if this is a possible solution to all the guys with DHCP problems...

          Kind regards
          Aubrey</end></start>

          When you pause to think, do you start again?

          2.2.4-RELEASE (amd64)
          built on Sat Jul 25 19:57:37 CDT 2015
          FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p15
          and
          pfSense 2.3.2-RELEASE-p1 (amd64 full-install) on pfSense

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • cyber7C Offline
            cyber7
            last edited by

            even forther on this:

            ORIGINAL CONFIG:
            SUPERMICRO MB with 2*Onboard NIC's running on 4GB MEM, 500GB HDD, SUPERMICRO NIC with 2 GB ports.

            CHANGED CONFIG:
            Removed 1 MEM (2GB) card.
            Disabled additional NIC (2*GB ports)

            Background (original config):
            1 * DIGINET line
            1 * ADSL line
            2 * LAN lines

            (Changed config):
            1 * DIGINET line
            1 * LAN line
            using the ONBOARD NICs.

            Adding an additional NIC (OPT1) I got a DEADLOCK on the system.  The MTU on this nic is set by default to 1500.  Will be doing testing later tomorrow, changing the NIC MTU to 1492 first and then adding it into the system.  Will report back.

            Kind regards
            Aubrey
            ps - I run a LIVE i386 release installed on the HDD. (Today's SNAP - 17-02-2011)

            When you pause to think, do you start again?

            2.2.4-RELEASE (amd64)
            built on Sat Jul 25 19:57:37 CDT 2015
            FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p15
            and
            pfSense 2.3.2-RELEASE-p1 (amd64 full-install) on pfSense

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • cyber7C Offline
              cyber7
              last edited by

              Sorry to say, this is not the solution.  I am sitting remotely and just got locked out of the system…

              Kind regards
              Aubrey

              When you pause to think, do you start again?

              2.2.4-RELEASE (amd64)
              built on Sat Jul 25 19:57:37 CDT 2015
              FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p15
              and
              pfSense 2.3.2-RELEASE-p1 (amd64 full-install) on pfSense

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • C Offline
                cmb
                last edited by

                @cyber7:

                So, is it not possible the errors (panics) I got was due to a miss-matched MTU?

                That particular panic was related to the PPTP or FTP proxy, upgrading should fix.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • jimpJ Offline
                  jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                  last edited by

                  Due to the builders being offline the latest snap doesn't have the final fix in it yet. One is building now that should have it though.

                  Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                  Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                  Do not Chat/PM for help!

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.