Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Transparent Firewall

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    4 Posts 2 Posters 2.2k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • C Offline
      chris.olver
      last edited by

      Hi all,
      I have recently deployed two pfsense servers in transparent mode and using CARP.. (NAT is all disabled) The servers (LAN side) of the firewall have public IPs (193.XXX.XXX.XXX):

      • FW1 WAN IP: 193.XXX.XXX.240

      • FW2 WAN IP: 193.XXX.XXX.241

      • CARP0 WAN IP: 193.XXX.XXX.242

      • FW1 LAN IP: 192.168.66.10

      • FW2 LAN IP: 192.168.66.20

      • CARP1 LAN IP: 192.168.66.30

      Both servers are high spec:

      • 4GB DDR2 RAM

      • Intel Dual-Port Server GB network card

      • 4GB USB Stick as storage

      • Quad-core processor

      I am trying to monitor everything just to make sure we don't get any speed issues. The only real purpose of this firewall is to block specific windows ports from the net. We have a few users reporting slow FTP with the logs on the firewall showing as: ftpsesame[48350]: #38 filter_allow failed: Device busy. Server resources are all below 5%..

      Googling, brought up one forum post but it didn't answer anything. Any advise is appreciated

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • jimpJ Offline
        jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
        last edited by

        From the console, watch "top -SH"

        Something must be consuming a large number of resources in order for that error to show up.

        You probably should be running pfSense 2.0-RC1 if you are mixing bridging+CARP. See here for why: http://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/910

        Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

        Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

        Do not Chat/PM for help!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • C Offline
          chris.olver
          last edited by

          Hi Jimp,
          Can't see anything blatant using all the usage up or using much usage .. Running iostat shows no wait either.

          Would I be best trying to upgrade to 2.0-RC1 and then seeing what happens?

          usage.png
          usage.png_thumb

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • jimpJ Offline
            jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
            last edited by

            The FTP proxy was completely redone in 2.0, so it's probably your best bet at this point.

            Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

            Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

            Do not Chat/PM for help!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • First post
              Last post
            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.