Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Help - FTP Clients Behind Pfsense 2.0 unable to connect to filezilla FTP server

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved NAT
    25 Posts 7 Posters 24.2k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • F
      firephlux
      last edited by

      Thank you for the reply.

      The FTP server is pureftpd and I have set the ForcePassiveIP to be the external IP address.
      Also I have set the PassivePortRange to a different smaller range.

      I have opened and forwarded the passive ports also the 21 port.
      Already have a rule that allows traffic through the server interface.

      So it should work but it doesn't.
      Active FTP doesn't work, passive connects but cant list files.

      In Total Commander:
      PORT 192,168,1,2,236,205
      500 I won't open a connection to 192.168.1.2 (only to 10.0.1.1)
      PORT Command failed.

      In FileZilla:
      Command: MLSD
      Error: Connection timed out
      Error: Failed to retrieve directory listing

      If I use the 1to1 everything works just fine, so its not a FTP Server issue, but i dont want to use 1to1 since it kinda defeats the purpose of having a firewall :).

      P.S.:
      I dont understand what you mean when you say:
      "create a rule on wan with src host = ftp server and src port 20  and dst host any or lan net"

      The field 'Destination port from' is required.
          The field 'Destination port to' is required.
          The field 'Redirect target IP' is required.

      Can you be more specific?

      Thank you.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • marcellocM
        marcelloc
        last edited by

        If I use the 1to1 everything works just fine, so its not a FTP Server issue

        your ftp server are external or internal?

        I dont understand what you mean when you say:
        "create a rule on wan with src host = ftp server and src port 20  and dst host any or lan net"

        This rule is to accept data connections from an external ftp server on wan interface

        ftp_active.png
        ftp_active.png_thumb

        Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

        Help a community developer! ;D

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • F
          firephlux
          last edited by

          The FTP Server is internal (i've attached a diagram)

          I can access the web/ftp server from anywhere on my 192.168.1.1/24 network using it's (the server's) internal IP (10.0.1.2).

          What I cant do is access the web/ftp server from my internal network using one of the external IP's (77.x.x.x).
          Also nobody on the internet can open a connection to the web/ftp server  (which i need to be accessible to the out side world).

          All other services on on the server are working, i've forwarded all necessary ports (HTTP/S, DNS, POP3/S, IMAP/S), everything works just fine except FTP.

          ![Network Diagram.PNG](/public/imported_attachments/1/Network Diagram.PNG)
          ![Network Diagram.PNG_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/Network Diagram.PNG_thumb)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • marcellocM
            marcelloc
            last edited by

            Nat config and rules for internet1 and internet2 are ok?

            did you read this thread?

            http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,15811.0.html

            nat_ftp.png
            nat_ftp.png_thumb

            Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

            Help a community developer! ;D

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • F
              firephlux
              last edited by

              yup.. the same i've tried it all to be honest thats why im writing here i thought perhaps there's something im missing

              Capture.png
              Capture.png_thumb

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • marcellocM
                marcelloc
                last edited by

                try this config with debug pf ftpproxy set to 0 and then set to 1

                Can you do a tcpdump via console on wan and other on ftp interface to see where it's not working?

                Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                Help a community developer! ;D

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • F
                  firephlux
                  last edited by

                  i've tried with both 0 and 1

                  also i've attached the tcpdump of the connection attempt

                  tcpdump.txt

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • marcellocM
                    marcelloc
                    last edited by

                    Your server does not respond when clients asks for data connection

                    20:01:49.215184 IP 10.0.1.1.59107 > 10.0.1.2.8030: Flags [s], seq 3043207109, win 65228, options [mss 1460,nop,wscale 7,sackOK,TS val 940128 ecr 0], length 0
                    20:01:52.230124 IP 10.0.1.1.59107 > 10.0.1.2.8030: Flags [s], seq 3043207109, win 65228, options [mss 1460,nop,wscale 7,sackOK,TS val 943128 ecr 0], length 0
                    20:01:55.446110 IP 10.0.1.1.59107 > 10.0.1.2.8030: Flags [s], seq 3043207109, win 65228, options [mss 1460,nop,wscale 7,sackOK,TS val 946328 ecr 0], length 0
                    20:01:58.662117 IP 10.0.1.1.59107 > 10.0.1.2.8030: Flags [s], seq 3043207109, win 65228, options [mss 1460,sackOK,eol], length 0
                    20:02:01.878088 IP 10.0.1.1.59107 > 10.0.1.2.8030: Flags [s], seq 3043207109, win 65228, options [mss 1460,sackOK,eol], length 0
                    20:02:05.094076 IP 10.0.1.1.59107 > 10.0.1.2.8030: Flags [s], seq 3043207109, win 65228, options [mss 1460,sackOK,eol], length 0
                    20:02:11.325075 IP 10.0.1.1.59107 > 10.0.1.2.8030: Flags [s], seq 3043207109, win 65228, options [mss 1460,sackOK,eol], length 0
                    
                    [b]10.0.1.1[/b] means you are doing [b]outbound nat[/b] for your ftp server too, what makes server logging useless[/s][/s][/s][/s][/s][/s][/s]
                    

                    Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                    Help a community developer! ;D

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • F
                      firephlux
                      last edited by

                      Yes you are right there was an outbound nat rule created (but at the time of the tcpdump it was on automatic).

                      Now i've deleted the rule and set it to manual and still i get the same behavior.

                      Capture2.PNG
                      Capture2.PNG_thumb

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • marcellocM
                        marcelloc
                        last edited by

                        Check why your server does not respond data connection

                        Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                        Help a community developer! ;D

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • chpalmerC
                          chpalmer
                          last edited by

                          Is it possible your modems(s) are catching the ftp connection attempts themselves?  Are they in bridge mode or are you using DMZ, or other?

                          Triggering snowflakes one by one..
                          Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4590T CPU @ 2.00GHz on an M400 WG box.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • F
                            firephlux
                            last edited by

                            @marcelloc
                            That's the thing the server has no errors it logs a successful connection the client cannot retrieve the directory list. (The user connect ok but cannot see any files, and since the client waits for the initial list to be retrieved it times out since nothing is returned).

                            @chpalmer
                            The main line (WAN1) is a direct 100mbit UTP link so there is no modem.
                            The second line is a VDSL back-up line which is not used in this setup (at the moment).

                            If I remove the PFSense box and link the main straight to the webserver everything works fine.

                            I honestly dont understand what's going on.
                            It's like PFSense choke's/block's/does not send the packets to the IP the requested them.

                            Since it look's like all the packets are returned to PFSense's IP some pass through (since the client can connect) while others stop when reaching the PFSense NIC.

                            P.S.: Happy new year everyone, i wish you all a great year.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • marcellocM
                              marcelloc
                              last edited by

                              Alex,

                              tcpdump again on ftp server interface to see if server sends back an S ack response to any S win on data ports.

                              And happy new year for you too  :D

                              Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                              Help a community developer! ;D

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • F
                                firephlux
                                last edited by

                                Sorry it took so long…

                                Here's a screen from wireshark..

                                From what i see it does respond.

                                Later Edit:

                                Ok, I've done some progress somewhat (still not working, but progress nonetheless).

                                It seems its all about outbound nat.
                                I've removed the rule yesterday and found out that the server was unable to send any data to the cloud.
                                So i've added it back and now it work just like before.
                                Thought to give it a try and added another one using a different interface for the rule.

                                Now total commander has a unsuccessful PORT command and falls into passive mode next it has a long pause for MLSD just like filezilla, and then it registers a successful connection (it's not successful but it thinks it is).

                                So I'll keep trying to find out which rule is to blame for all this and I'll post my result here if successful, perhaps it'll help somebody else.

                                Later edit2:

                                Bummer, i'm getting nowhere, still stuck at:

                                Command: MLSD
                                Error: Connection timed out
                                Error: Failed to retrieve directory listing

                                Capture.png
                                Capture.png_thumb

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • marcellocM
                                  marcelloc
                                  last edited by

                                  why you are still translating client address to 10.0.1.1?

                                  who is 10.0.1.1? firewall interface address?

                                  where in wireshark log you sent I can found server port requested by client?

                                  Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                                  Help a community developer! ;D

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • F
                                    firephlux
                                    last edited by

                                    That's a very good question. I had no rules to translate client addresses, actually only ftp was/is doing that. I've tested HTTP and smtp to see if it has the same behavior, but its not happening the server receives the requests from the clients public IP address.

                                    For FTP on the other hand all requests are translated to the PFSense NIC the links the server (in this case: the server has 10.0.1.2 and the PFSense 10.0.1.1).

                                    And there's more, the weirdest thing happened yesterday.
                                    I removed PureFTPD's ForcePassiveIP line from the config, so now the server does not report the external IP address to the clients.. and now everything works :|
                                    I really dont understand why it has the behavior. It reports back to the client the internal IP address (A.I.: 10.0.1.2) but the client automatically switches to the external IP address,
                                    so now everything works from with in the LAN network and from the Internet.

                                    I would have loved that the ftp server wouldn't report back to the client the internal network address, but at least it's working now.

                                    Anywho thank you for the help and fast responses marcelloc and anyone else who replied.

                                    Cheers,
                                    Alex.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • marcellocM
                                      marcelloc
                                      last edited by

                                      @Alex:

                                      I had no rules to translate client addresses, actually only ftp was/is doing that.

                                      That's the ftp helper/proxy from pfsense.

                                      Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                                      Help a community developer! ;D

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • K
                                        Kevon
                                        last edited by

                                        I ran into the same issue using PFSense 2.0 and FileZilla server 0.9.4

                                        On the FTP server, limit the Passive Ports to a restricted range. eg. 35100-35152
                                        Now add NAT for the External FTP IP for ports 35100-35152 to the Internal FTP server address

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • marcellocM
                                          marcelloc
                                          last edited by

                                          Did you created nat for port 21 too?

                                          ftp server is configured for active and passive data transfers?

                                          Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                                          Help a community developer! ;D

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • K
                                            Kevon
                                            last edited by

                                            @marcelloc:

                                            Did you created nat for port 21 too?

                                            ftp server is configured for active and passive data transfers?

                                            Yes, the passive port range NAT is in addition to the standard FTP NAT.
                                            In my case I set implicit TLS and NAT'd port 990 instead of 21.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.