• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

PfBlocker

pfSense Packages
143
896
1.3m
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M
    marcelloc
    last edited by Dec 31, 2011, 2:38 AM Dec 31, 2011, 2:34 AM

    Not sure, I did it on a x64 virtual machine and I do not get php limit errors.

    All files are uploaded.

    EDIT

    With all these large files, my virtual machine gets 100% cpu for more then a minute and even with a very large table size, it reach virtual machine memory limit (384Mb).

    Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

    Help a community developer! ;D

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • M
      marcelloc
      last edited by Dec 31, 2011, 4:18 AM Dec 31, 2011, 3:53 AM

      Something interesting about table-entries limit:

      I've set up maximum table entries to a very high value 99999999999 at gui and could see it reflected on /tmp/rules.debug

      BUT

      on pfctl -sa I get this:
      LIMITS:
      states        hard limit  1000000
      src-nodes     hard limit  1000000
      frags         hard limit     5000
      tables        hard limit     1000
      table-entries hard limit 1215752191

      I saw my virtual machine freezing console with 99999999999 value, so I reduced it on gui to 5000000

      EDIT

      After 2G RAM, Firewall Maximum Table Entries set to 5000000 and a reboot

      I get no erros with both large lists applied

      as x64 version already has ini_set("memory_limit","256M");, I've just included ini_set('memory_limit', '250M'); on line two of /usr/local/pkg/pfblocker.inc

      Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

      Help a community developer! ;D

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • T
        taryezveb
        last edited by Dec 31, 2011, 5:26 AM

        @marcelloc:

        Something interesting about table-entries limit:

        I've set up maximum table entries to a very high value 99999999999 at gui and could see it reflected on /tmp/rules.debug

        BUT

        on pfctl -sa I get this:
        LIMITS:
        states        hard limit  1000000
        src-nodes     hard limit  1000000
        frags         hard limit     5000
        tables        hard limit     1000
        table-entries hard limit 1215752191

        I saw my virtual machine freezing console with 99999999999 value, so I reduced it on gui to 5000000

        EDIT

        After 2G RAM, Firewall Maximum Table Entries set to 5000000 and a reboot

        I get no erros with both large lists applied

        as x64 version already has ini_set("memory_limit","256M");, I've just included ini_set('memory_limit', '250M'); on line two of /usr/local/pkg/pfblocker.inc

        Interesting, and  yes when I edited /etc/inc/config.inc I saw it already had  ini_set("memory_limit","256M"); . I have a x64 install. Nevertheless when I get a chance I will try your last settings again and reboot. Thanks for the info.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • T
          taryezveb
          last edited by Jan 1, 2012, 3:16 AM Jan 1, 2012, 2:58 AM

          @marcelloc:

          EDIT

          After 2G RAM, Firewall Maximum Table Entries set to 5000000 and a reboot

          I get no erros with both large lists applied

          as x64 version already has ini_set("memory_limit","256M");, I've just included ini_set('memory_limit', '250M'); on line two of /usr/local/pkg/pfblocker.inc

          Yes! :) I tested the above and no more errors, sort of; I'll explain below.

          I did the following:

          Edited /usr/local/pkg/pfblocker.inc adding the following on the first line where the comments end[from the top]. Right after this line:
          */                                         <- this is line number 31
          ini_set("memory_limit", "250M");  <- this would be line number 32

          Then set the Firewall Maximum Table Entries: 5000000 and did a reboot. But received these errors:
          Dec 31 18:13:44 php: : There was an error while parsing the package filter rules for /usr/local/pkg/squid.inc.

          Dec 31 18:13:44 php: : The command '/sbin/pfctl -nf /tmp/rules.test.packages' returned exit code '1', the output was 'no IP address found for 550.164.3.166/32 /tmp/rules.test.packages:17: file "/var/db/aliastables/pfBlockerBluetack.txt" contains bad data'

          After some testing those errors are due to using the following list:
          http://list.iblocklist.com/?list=bt_proxy&fileformat=p2p&archiveformat=gz

          NOTE: I tried several times removing and adding that list, with the same result.

          Once I removed that list I got this:
          Dec 31 18:46:28 php: : The command '/sbin/pfctl -o basic -f /tmp/rules.debug' returned exit code '1', the output was 'no IP address found for 75.35.185. /tmp/rules.debug:19: file "/var/db/aliastables/pfBlockerTBG.txt" contains bad data no IP address found for ÿ0.0.0.0/8 /tmp/rules.debug:95: file "/etc/bogons" contains bad data pfctl: Syntax error in config file: pf rules not loaded'

          More testing and the error above was due to this list:
          http://list.iblocklist.com/?list=bt_level1&fileformat=p2p&archiveformat=gz

          But this time after removing the list above and re-adding the error went away. I guess there are some issues with those lists. Will try to contact the author to see if that can be fixed.

          So in the end, no more errors and Squid works as a transparent proxy using pfBlocker as well now :)

          For reference these are the lists that I'm currently using error free:

          <pfblockerlists><config><aliasname>Bluetack</aliasname>

          <row><format>gz</format>
          <url>http://list.iblocklist.com/?list=bt_level1&fileformat=p2p&archiveformat=gz</url></row>
          <row><format>gz</format>
          <url>http://list.iblocklist.com/?list=bt_level2&fileformat=p2p&archiveformat=gz</url></row>
          <row><format>gz</format>
          <url>http://list.iblocklist.com/?list=bt_level3&fileformat=p2p&archiveformat=gz</url></row>
          <row><format>gz</format>
          <url>http://list.iblocklist.com/?list=bt_ads&fileformat=p2p&archiveformat=gz</url></row>
          <row><format>gz</format>
          <url>http://list.iblocklist.com/?list=bt_spyware&fileformat=p2p&archiveformat=gz</url></row>
          <row><format>gz</format>
          <url>http://list.iblocklist.com/?list=bt_templist&fileformat=p2p&archiveformat=gz</url></row>
          <row><format>gz</format>
          <url>http://list.iblocklist.com/?list=bt_hijacked&fileformat=p2p&archiveformat=gz</url></row>
          <row><format>gz</format>
          <url>http://list.iblocklist.com/?list=bt_dshield&fileformat=p2p&archiveformat=gz</url></row>
          <row><format>gz</format>
          <url>http://list.iblocklist.com/?list=bt_bogon&fileformat=p2p&archiveformat=gz</url></row>
          <action>Deny_Inbound</action>
          <cron>EveryDay</cron></config>
          <config><aliasname>TBG</aliasname>

          <row><format>gz</format>
          <url>http://list.iblocklist.com/?list=ijfqtofzixtwayqovmxn&fileformat=p2p&archiveformat=gz</url></row>
          <row><format>gz</format>
          <url>http://list.iblocklist.com/?list=ecqbsykllnadihkdirsh&fileformat=p2p&archiveformat=gz</url></row>
          <row><format>gz</format>
          <url>http://list.iblocklist.com/?list=tbnuqfclfkemqivekikv&fileformat=p2p&archiveformat=gz</url></row>
          <row><format>gz</format>
          <url>http://list.iblocklist.com/?list=ewqglwibdgjttwttrinl&fileformat=p2p&archiveformat=gz</url></row>
          <action>Deny_Inbound</action>
          <cron>EveryDay</cron></config></pfblockerlists>

          I would like to Thank marcelloc for his time looking into this. A donation was made[yesterday, before marcelloc posted the fix]; will donate again when I can. Hope this change is added to the package for all to benefit, after a few more days of testing. To make sure this change does not affect anything else.

          EDIT: Happy New Year :)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M
            marcelloc
            last edited by Jan 1, 2012, 4:53 AM Jan 1, 2012, 3:18 AM

            Thanks  ;D. Did you mentioned these packages developers on donation?

            Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

            Help a community developer! ;D

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • T
              taryezveb
              last edited by Jan 1, 2012, 5:01 AM

              @marcelloc:

              Did you mentioned these packages developers on donation?

              Yes, I broke it down on how the donation should broken up. Like so: $XX for the X package maintainer(s).

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • M
                marcelloc
                last edited by Jan 1, 2012, 5:06 AM

                I'll include this ini_set('memory_limit', '250M') patch when pfblocker detects a x64 version.

                There are other places to edit it, maybe a redmine for that as diagnostics-> tables also has a 128Mb limit even on x64.

                Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                Help a community developer! ;D

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • T
                  taryezveb
                  last edited by Jan 1, 2012, 5:45 AM Jan 1, 2012, 5:14 AM

                  @marcelloc:

                  I'll include this ini_set('memory_limit', '250M') patch when pfblocker detects a x64 version.

                  There are other places to edit it, maybe a redmine for that as diagnostics-> tables also has a 128Mb limit even on x64.

                  Great and yes good point, since Diagnostics -> Tables gives a similar: Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 134217728 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 71 bytes) in /usr/local/www/diag_tables.php on line 89

                  But at least that does not affect things like the previous "Fatal error: Allowed memory size…" did.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • T
                    tommyboy180
                    last edited by Jan 3, 2012, 2:44 AM

                    countryipblocks.net is testing their latest IPv4 Network Aggregation scripts and would like to have your help. They are in two formats:

                    PG2 and IP Range.

                    If you get a chance, please test them with us and give feedback so we can pass on to countryipblocks.

                    www.countryipblocks.net

                    -Tom Schaefer
                    SuperMicro 1U 2X Intel pro/1000 Dual Core Intel 2.2 Ghz - 2 Gig RAM

                    Please support pfBlocker | File Browser | Strikeback

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • R
                      RonpfS
                      last edited by Jan 3, 2012, 11:36 PM Jan 3, 2012, 9:01 PM

                      I ran into an issue with pfBlocker when trying to copy the configuration onto a new install.

                      I am using aliases only, a Block in rule on WAN, a Reject out rule on LAN.
                      I have the following packages: Backup 0.1.5, Cron 0.1.5, Filemanager 0.1.1, pfBlocker 1.0.1, Snort 2.9.1 v 2.0.2
                      Running pfsense 2.0.1 x86

                      1. I saved the configuration including RRD data

                      2. I restored the configuration to a fresh 2.0.1 install on the same machine

                      It rebooted and started to install packages, but pfsense could not access the internet because of the pfBlocker was not running and the missing aliases break the firewall.
                      I could not recover, removing rules didn' work. I was spending too much time trying things and failing, I ended up cloning the old disk instead.

                      What is the way to recover from the pfBlocker aliases problem?
                      just removing the rules in the GUI didn't work. I didn't try to remove the table or alias.
                      I remove the rules in the config.xml, to no available.
                      Today I see that I should have removed the alias. Is this enough?
                      I do not have a spare machine to do testing.

                      What is the best way to copy the configuration ?
                      Was I supposed to install all the packages before restoring the configuration?
                      This might have worked if the Restore config script did the package install before the reboot.
                      (or download the package now before the reboot to prepare for package install)

                      I guess removing the rules and disabling pfBlocker before saving the configuration should work.

                      2.4.5-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)
                      Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q8400 @ 2.66GHz 8GB
                      Backup 0.5_5, Bandwidthd 0.7.4_4, Cron 0.3.7_5, pfBlockerNG-devel 3.0.0_16, Status_Traffic_Totals 2.3.1_1, System_Patches 1.2_5

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • M
                        marcelloc
                        last edited by Jan 3, 2012, 9:20 PM

                        I restored the configuration to a fresh 2.0.1 install on the same machine

                        You may need to install packages before config restore

                        I did few upgrades with pfblocker installed with no erros, but I did not tried a system restore.

                        I'll try to reproduce it.

                        Are you using pfBlocker on full install or nanobsd?

                        I guess removing the rules and disabling pfBlocker before saving the configuration should work.

                        This should be the best option

                        Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                        Help a community developer! ;D

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • R
                          RonpfS
                          last edited by Jan 3, 2012, 9:55 PM

                          @marcelloc:

                          Are you using pfBlocker on full install or nanobsd?

                          Full install from CD pfSense-2.0.1-RELEASE-i386.iso.gz

                          2.0.1-RELEASE (i386)
                          built on Mon Dec 12 18:24:17 EST 2011
                          FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p6

                          Platform pfSense
                          CPU Type Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1.80GHz

                          2.4.5-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)
                          Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q8400 @ 2.66GHz 8GB
                          Backup 0.5_5, Bandwidthd 0.7.4_4, Cron 0.3.7_5, pfBlockerNG-devel 3.0.0_16, Status_Traffic_Totals 2.3.1_1, System_Patches 1.2_5

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • T
                            taryezveb
                            last edited by Jan 7, 2012, 8:22 PM

                            @marcelloc:

                            I'll include this ini_set('memory_limit', '250M') patch when pfblocker detects a x64 version.

                            marcelloc,

                            Just wanted to report back. After using the above now for the last 6 days. I don't see that affecting anything.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • M
                              marcelloc
                              last edited by Jan 9, 2012, 2:41 AM

                              countryipblocks.net released a new bogon network list on their site,

                              check this out.  :)

                              http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,44867.msg233407.html#msg233407

                              Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                              Help a community developer! ;D

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • T
                                taryezveb
                                last edited by Jan 13, 2012, 12:12 AM

                                I had to do a configuration restore today and I'm not getting any php memory error(s) so far. This includes reinstalling all packages. So, ini_set("memory_limit", "250M") in /usr/local/pkg/pfblocker.inc  seems to not be needed here anymore, well at least so far. Will report back if I start to get the php memory error(s). But I wonder why it is working fine now without editing /usr/local/pkg/pfblocker.inc ?

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • M
                                  marcelloc
                                  last edited by Jan 13, 2012, 2:48 AM Jan 13, 2012, 2:29 AM

                                  when you apply a new list, pfblocker may increase memory usage do download list and apply it to alias.

                                  when you upgrade downloaded files are not removed. The ini_set("memory_limit", "250M") will be merged to next release and used when x64 instalation is detected.

                                  Thanks for your feedback  :)

                                  Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                                  Help a community developer! ;D

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • T
                                    taryezveb
                                    last edited by Jan 13, 2012, 2:42 AM

                                    Great, Thanks :)

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • F
                                      firestrife23
                                      last edited by Jan 14, 2012, 2:40 AM

                                      I'm seeing double entries for each rules list auto generated by pfblocker under firewall's rules… Is that's normal?

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • M
                                        marcelloc
                                        last edited by Jan 14, 2012, 3:17 AM

                                        If you checked deny both, then will be two rules with the same list on each interface firewall rules.

                                        Can you check if they are identical?

                                        Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                                        Help a community developer! ;D

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • F
                                          firestrife23
                                          last edited by Jan 14, 2012, 4:23 AM

                                          All of my rules are set to "Deny Inbound"

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          315 out of 896
                                          • First post
                                            315/896
                                            Last post
                                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.