Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Poor response time with thousands of vlan interfaces

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    33 Posts 8 Posters 8.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • jimpJ Offline
      jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
      last edited by

      Works for me after that commit. :-)

      Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

      Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

      Do not Chat/PM for help!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Y Offline
        ycflash
        last edited by

        @jimp:

        Works for me after that commit. :-)

        Me too.
        Still cannot see vlan interfaces in assigning or bridging page.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • jimpJ Offline
          jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
          last edited by

          They show up for me in the assignment drop-down list. And if I assign and enable one, then it shows up to bridge (the list in bridge only shows assigned and enabled interfaces)

          Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

          Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

          Do not Chat/PM for help!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Y Offline
            ycflash
            last edited by

            I double checked, assigning interface page drop-down list do have vlan interfaces now.
            But my question is: since interfaces_bridge_edit.php get only configured interface as bridge member capable ones,

            
            48 $ifacelist = get_configured_interface_with_descr(); 
            
            

            Is there any need to assign them before we can add to bridge?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • E Offline
              eri--
              last edited by

              In 2.0 that is enforced to make sure the interface part of the bridge is always properly configured.

              Generally, its not a requirement, but there needs to be some bookkeeping for bridge members and that is why it was not done for 2.0.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Y Offline
                ycflash
                last edited by

                I understand that and thanks for your help!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • S Offline
                  Supermule Banned
                  last edited by

                  Could this be purged to the official release pls :)

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • jimpJ Offline
                    jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                    last edited by

                    Ermal already committed that to RELENG_2_0, but it's not like we'd make a 2.0.2 just for thatโ€ฆ so it will be an official release eventually, just not yet. If you want it in the meantime, feel free to sync your code to the current RELENG_2_0 code using gitsync.

                    Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                    Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                    Do not Chat/PM for help!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • S Offline
                      Supermule Banned
                      last edited by

                      Any updates on this matter??

                      Is it in the snapshots of 2.1??

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • jimpJ Offline
                        jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                        last edited by

                        Yes it should be in 2.1. Not sure what else there would be to "update" this - it was fixed in our repo (as I mentioned before) so it would be fixed in the next release.

                        Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                        Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                        Do not Chat/PM for help!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.