• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Port 53 question

2.1 Snapshot Feedback and Problems - RETIRED
3
12
2.8k
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D
    databeestje
    last edited by Apr 18, 2012, 5:57 PM

    nat reflection for dns does not work, sorry.

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • Y
      yon
      last edited by Apr 18, 2012, 6:07 PM

      @databeestje:

      nat reflection for dns does not work, sorry.

      well.., why it is ?  :o

      Then How I do use public ip address connect port 53?

      If you are interested in free peering for clearnet and dn42,contact me !

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • D
        databeestje
        last edited by Apr 18, 2012, 8:00 PM

        it will work fine when traffic comes in over the internet, it does not work when trying to connect to the external address from the inside.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Y
          yon
          last edited by Apr 18, 2012, 8:04 PM

          @databeestje:

          it will work fine when traffic comes in over the internet, it does not work when trying to connect to the external address from the inside.

          I can visit external address port 80 in lan, just I don't understand port 53  why it can not do this.?

          If you are interested in free peering for clearnet and dn42,contact me !

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • J
            jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
            last edited by Apr 18, 2012, 8:08 PM

            NAT reflection does not work for any UDP traffic. There is already an open ticket about it.

            Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

            Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

            Do not Chat/PM for help!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Y
              yon
              last edited by Apr 18, 2012, 8:12 PM

              @jimp:

              NAT reflection does not work for any UDP traffic. There is already an open ticket about it.

              ok.  then should allow dns use tcp. I have submit ticket about dns tcp.

              If you are interested in free peering for clearnet and dn42,contact me !

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • J
                jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                last edited by Apr 18, 2012, 8:18 PM

                I doubt that will gain much support, it is a lot of work for very little benefit. At any moment your ISP could realize what's going on and block DNS over TCP also and it would be a bunch of work wasted. But if someone else is doing the work, have at it…

                Fixing NAT reflection for UDP is the real fix for this issue.

                Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                Do not Chat/PM for help!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Y
                  yon
                  last edited by Apr 18, 2012, 8:27 PM

                  @jimp:

                  I doubt that will gain much support, it is a lot of work for very little benefit. At any moment your ISP could realize what's going on and block DNS over TCP also and it would be a bunch of work wasted. But if someone else is doing the work, have at it…

                  Fixing NAT reflection for UDP is the real fix for this issue.

                  yes. Fixing NAT reflection for UDP.

                  Because of the defects of the UDP protocol itself, easily lead to data tampering and counterfeiting. so use tcp will helpful Prevent tampering with the falsification of data.

                  and it has some codes for Security issue. http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,48520.0.html

                  If you are interested in free peering for clearnet and dn42,contact me !

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • J
                    jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                    last edited by Apr 18, 2012, 8:32 PM

                    Yeah but those don't belong here in the 2.1 board since they will not happen for 2.1.

                    Not sure any of those will happen, they all seem to be specific to certain other services or practices and require both a client and server component… If you're tunneling to your own DNS server, may as well use a VPN.

                    DNSSEC can help with the verification part, but still not relevant to this topic. This is only about reflection for UDP.

                    Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                    Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                    Do not Chat/PM for help!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Y
                      yon
                      last edited by Apr 18, 2012, 8:50 PM

                      this is not about vpn, and can't use vpn Solve.

                      now I build an dns server in my lan network, when my dns server or other server transfer any data to internet, then the data will be government ISP Forged tampering.

                      This is a security issue. If the pfsense gateway solution, it is a good thing.

                      If you are interested in free peering for clearnet and dn42,contact me !

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • J
                        jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                        last edited by Apr 18, 2012, 8:55 PM

                        …and still not relevant to this thread. If you want to argue all that, use your other thread(s) that cover that specifically.

                        Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                        Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                        Do not Chat/PM for help!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        11 out of 12
                        • First post
                          11/12
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.