Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Showing update for 2.1?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.1 Snapshot Feedback and Problems - RETIRED
    18 Posts 9 Posters 7.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • chpalmerC
      chpalmer
      last edited by

      We want to get a good 2.1 out in plenty of time for people to get migrated in advance of IPv6 launch day.

      Now for the good news, once we're past 2.1 we can start pushing on 9 but at that point we won't have all of the IPv6 bits to worry about finishing as well as the 9.x bits. So it's a bit easier goal to have at that point.

      Yup! Totally understand that…  And appreciate everything you guys do!

      And always happy to install on the test box here if it helps in any way...   trouble reports, crashes ect...   If it breaks it I just blow up the drive and start over.  ;D

      Triggering snowflakes one by one..
      Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4590T CPU @ 2.00GHz on an M400 WG box.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • jimpJ
        jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
        last edited by

        We will probably start up some 2.1 snapshots on 8.2 or 8-STABLE here in the near future (perhaps this week?) but I'm not sure I'd recommend them yet for "production" use, as we need to make sure we get all of the patches sorted before they're in a good state.

        Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

        Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

        Do not Chat/PM for help!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stephenw10S
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
          last edited by

          Interesting stuff!
          The two boxes I've run the 9 based Nano image on have run like a champ. The only issue I had was not being able to set the password and a delay during boot.
          The updated driver support that will come with either 8.3 or 9 is what I'm looking forward to so in that respect it doesn't make much difference.
          Is there anything big in 9 that we're missing out on?  ;)

          Steve

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • jimpJ
            jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
            last edited by

            There are a few things, but I'm not sure what all has been backported for 8.3. There is probably a list somewhere on FreeBSD's site.

            Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

            Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

            Do not Chat/PM for help!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • D
              dhatz
              last edited by

              Which version of pf will be available in pfsense 2.1 / FreeBSD 8.3 ?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • jimpJ
                jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                last edited by

                Yes

                Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                Do not Chat/PM for help!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • B
                  bmah
                  last edited by

                  Hrm.  There's a goal (according to a prior posting in this thread) of pfSense 2.1 sometime in March.  FreeBSD 8.3 is currently targeted for release around 23 March…see for instance one of the release engineering pages:

                  http://www.freebsd.org/releases/8.3R/schedule.html

                  Despite everybody's best efforts, FreeBSD has had it's fair share of schedule slippages over the years (no disrepect intended towards any former or current members of the FreeBSD Project...many project schedules slip for a variety of reasons).  Please be prepared for the possibilty that FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE might slip as well (note there's only a week between the target release date and the end of March).

                  Bruce.

                  PS.  Somebody asked about backports to 8.3.  In theory the release notes for 8.3 will document all the significant changes since 8.2.  In the past they used to be updated on a rolling basis, but the trend recently has been more to do the release notes at the end of the release cycle.  Worst case, the commit logs for the 8/stable branch are publicly available.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • jimpJ
                    jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                    last edited by

                    Oh yeah, we know those things all too well :-)

                    If we keep our patches and such up to date and keep builds going we can time it pretty well to go along with 8.3-RELEASE, but we expect some slipping I'm sure. A goal is just a goal after all. We don't like to ship things until they are ready.

                    Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                    Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                    Do not Chat/PM for help!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • M
                      m4f1050
                      last edited by

                      802.11n is something I am hoping we get soon on FreeBSD.  Is it available yet (on 8.3 or 9?)

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • W
                        wallabybob
                        last edited by

                        @m4f1050:

                        802.11n is something I am hoping we get soon on FreeBSD.  Is it available yet (on 8.3 or 9?)

                        No. Some 802.11n capable devices are supported in 802.11g compatible mode.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.