Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Temperature Widget

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.1 Snapshot Feedback and Problems - RETIRED
    95 Posts 15 Posters 44.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • ?
      Guest
      last edited by

      Yes, so im pretty sure that it wont be a good idea to modify the temp widgets code to print them in Fahrenheit or use that as a default. (see discussion above)
      daplumpler: other People may get confused in the beginnings. I dont think we want this happening in such a critical area.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stephenw10S
        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
        last edited by

        Here is the coretemp module from my FreeBSD install.
        It's an i386 (32bit) module from FreeBSD 8.3 rel. As before:

        @stephenw10:

        Copy coretemp.ko into /boot/modules
        Add```
        coretemp_load="YES"

        I don't have a 64bit install at the moment unfortunately.

        Remove the .png extension.

        Steve

        coretemp.ko.png

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M
          m4f1050
          last edited by

          @ThorstenK:

          Depends on if its fahrenheit or celsius too, hehe.

          I see that mbmon is getting much attention and currently we support coretemp and acpi.
          The code generates a source indepent temperature array, so its possible to add mbmon to.
          I will add it as a source. Its not much effort and then everyone is able to to query with his favorite toy in the BE ;)

          –-

          Maybe ill decide do a package too in the future, when i build up enough knowledge to do so, but lets keep the balls down for the moment :)
          After all atm its just a neat patch which adds some sensors.

          Steven posted a link to the coretemp modules here: http://files.pfsense.org/jimp/ko-8.1/amd64/coretemp.ko

          From what I understand, my T1 is my CPU temp and my T3 is my chipset temp.  I am guessing if it's 127.0 (always at that) that temp is not available.  You can program it to check if it's 127.0 to NOT display it in the GUI…  If they are interested in knowing all the temps and not just the CPU temp..

          BTW I confirmed with my buddy's FB X500 with good fan that he is running T1=45C , T2=127C and T3=77C  (~2C less, so I am good)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • ?
            Guest
            last edited by

            mmh. I dont think that we really want that. Maybe 127 is 1111111 and so some kind of magic value.
            and "normally" such a high temperature isnt realistic to be ever shown.

            Automatically deactivating a sensor just for convinience isnt a good idea in general.
            It is better to implement a configuration screen (see notes about planned pach 2) which lets the user the decision to select the sensors on a per system base.

            Ill push the implementation to patch 2.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • rcfaR
              rcfa
              last edited by

              @ThorstenK:

              Steven posted a link to the coretemp modules here: http://files.pfsense.org/jimp/ko-8.1/amd64/coretemp.ko

              Yep, but that's for BSD 8.1, but we're running 8.3, AFAIK that's not compatible.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • ?
                Guest
                last edited by

                Thats right - Please check the last post of Steven. He posted the mod as attachment.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • rcfaR
                  rcfa
                  last edited by

                  @ThorstenK:

                  Thats right - Please check the last post of Steven. He posted the mod as attachment.

                  Maybe I'm dense, or you're talking about a different Steven than I think you're talking about, but all I can find is a 32-bit version for 8.3, which won't work because I'm running a 64-bit install, and a 64-bit version for 8.1, which won't work because I'm on 8.3

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • ?
                    Guest
                    last edited by

                    This is right; StevenW10 runs on 32 bit. So when your runnig a 64 bit system it might be best to create a custom kernel or to fetch the bins from a 64bit freeBSD8.3 install or use a 32bit system if everything else fails.
                    Hm- Idea: Its good when skilled people solve problems - When your done you maybe decide to extend the pfsense Installer to check for the availability of the kmod. This way this problem will be solved for the future :)
                    Edit: Sorry stephenW10 for misspelling.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stephenw10S
                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                      last edited by

                      It just requires one of you guys to download the 64bit FreeBSD 8.3 iso and extract the module from it. I'll do it tonight when it doesn't count towards my bandwidth cap if no one's done it by then.

                      Steve

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • ?
                        Guest
                        last edited by

                        Hi - since im on gprs right now, i cant do it till eom ;( so maybe you want to try:

                        ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/ISO-IMAGES/8.3/
                        

                        hanD!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • M
                          m4f1050
                          last edited by

                          @ThorstenK:

                          mmh. I dont think that we really want that. Maybe 127 is 1111111 and so some kind of magic value.
                          and "normally" such a high temperature isnt realistic to be ever shown.

                          Automatically deactivating a sensor just for convinience isnt a good idea in general.
                          It is better to implement a configuration screen (see notes about planned pach 2) which lets the user the decision to select the sensors on a per system base.

                          Ill push the implementation to patch 2.

                          Yeah, that's definitely a better approach.  Let the user pick.  If you can't have user interaction then filtering the 127 would work I think.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • ?
                            Guest
                            last edited by

                            mmh. it may take a week for patch two i think. 
                            I wouldnt like it very much, but meanwhile -
                            What about for a config tunable, which we set for filtering out sensors with 127 degrees ?
                            This would be fast to implement and seems like a good compromise, what do you think ?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • M
                              m4f1050
                              last edited by

                              @ThorstenK:

                              mmh. it may take a week for patch two i think. 
                              I wouldnt like it very much, but meanwhile -
                              What about for a config tunable, which we set for filtering out sensors with 127 degrees ?
                              This would be fast to implement and seems like a good compromise, what do you think ?

                              I agree, I mean, if it's there (and working) why not use it?  We need to add mbmon also.  I have the 32-bit version, I think the 64-bit CPUs prob. already have working coretemp32 or coretemp64?

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • ?
                                Guest
                                last edited by

                                From what i know its already available, but we have to check that. I switched machines and had to reinst Windows because of anno2070 wasnt working under wine. This has changed meanwhile 8))) So as soon as i have hsdpa again (eoMonth)- ill switch back to linux and FreeBSD :) and write the extension to include mbmon first with the tunable above.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • rcfaR
                                  rcfa
                                  last edited by

                                  OK, finally got the coretemp.ko installed, etc. and now have a temperature reading of a cool 35C

                                  Was a little bit involved, because OS X doesn't grok BSD's file system, so I ended up doing a memory stick, mounting it on the pfSense box, and then copied it with an slogin over to where it needs to go.

                                  The config file I ended up editing with the Web GUI, because I couldn't remember the name of the non-vi editor installed on pfSense, it's not nano or pico, and of course not emacs (which I usually would use)
                                  Why the heck keep I forgetting the name?  ???

                                  Anyway, things are working. Now it's going to be interesting to see what get's stomped over with the next upgrade that I'm just running….

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • stephenw10S
                                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                    last edited by

                                    It's ee (easy editor) ;)

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • C
                                      Cino
                                      last edited by

                                      @rcfa:

                                      OK, finally got the coretemp.ko installed, etc. and now have a temperature reading of a cool 35C

                                      wish mine was at 35c, 60c right now :-(

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • stephenw10S
                                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                        last edited by

                                        Here's the 64bit coretemp.ko from FreeBSD 8.3 for anyone else.
                                        Remove the .png extension.

                                        Steve

                                        coretemp.ko.png

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • K
                                          kalu
                                          last edited by

                                          Temperature widget is not available (or not supported) on our nano bsd alix boards..
                                          :(

                                          i love pfsense because i love open source.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • rcfaR
                                            rcfa
                                            last edited by

                                            @kalu:

                                            Temperature widget is not available (or not supported) on our nano bsd alix boards..
                                            :(

                                            What kind of CPUs do these have? If the CPU doesn't have built-in sensors (like e.g. the intel Core CPUs or the intel Atom CPUs), or the motherboard doesn't have a temperature sensor that's somehow published (e.g. ACPI), then it's got to be a no-go.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.