Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    DHCP6 getting strange lease.

    2.1 Snapshot Feedback and Problems - RETIRED
    2
    4
    1.9k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • M
      mrzaz
      last edited by

      Hello,

      I'm quite new in the IPv6 arena but have tested some with the IPv6 in pfsense against Win7 machine.

      I have managed to get both Unmanaged (stateless_autoconfig) to work and also Managed (with DHCP6).
      (including ping and FTP to a IPv6 aware FTP-server on one of the machines working OK)

      However I stumbled on a strange thing that I can't figure out if it is fault from my side or something fishy!

      My LAN IPv6 IP is: (Using Unique Local IP)
      fd00::10:0a00:27ff:fe6f:e98e / 64

      LinkLocal:
      fe80::a00:27ff:fe6f:e98e

      Router Advertisements = Managed
      Enable DHCPv6 = YES
      Subnet fd00:0:0:10:0:0:0:0
      Subnet mask 64 bits
      Available range fd00:0:0:10:0:0:0:1 - fd00:0:0:10:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff

      Just for testing I made the following range:
      fd00:0:0:10:FFFF:0:9999:1     TO     fd00:0:0:10:FFFF:0:9999:2

      BUT has also tested with
      fd00:0:0:10:0:0:0:1     TO     fd00:0:0:10:0:0:0:9

      Prefix Delegation = blank (default)

      RESULT:
      The client always get  IPv6 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : fd00:0:0:10::2000
      regardless what I put in the "Range" settings above.   Have tested 2 different range settings but same result.
      And the IP assigned is not within the range.

      No.     Time        Source                Destination           Protocol Length Info
           1 0.000000    fe80::39cf:c6b0:4657:c4ed ff02::1:2             DHCPv6   147    Solicit XID: 0xb3d717 CID: 00010001153faa28f46d04063ba8
           2 0.001531    fe80::a00:27ff:fe6f:e98e fe80::39cf:c6b0:4657:c4ed DHCPv6   166    Advertise XID: 0xb3d717 IAA: fd00:0:0:10::2000 CID: 00010001153faa28f46d04063ba8
           3 1.000891    fe80::39cf:c6b0:4657:c4ed ff02::1:2             DHCPv6   193    Request XID: 0xb3d717 CID: 00010001153faa28f46d04063ba8 IAA: fd00:0:0:10::2000
           4 1.003097    fe80::a00:27ff:fe6f:e98e fe80::39cf:c6b0:4657:c4ed DHCPv6   166    Reply XID: 0xb3d717 IAA: fd00:0:0:10::2000 CID: 00010001153faa28f46d04063ba8

      LinkLocal IP of the Client:
      fe80::39cf:c6b0:4657:c4ed

      The advertise from the PfSense is:
         Identity Association for Non-temporary Address
             Option: Identity Association for Non-temporary Address (3)
             Length: 40
             Value: 0ef46d04000000000000000000050018fd00000000000010…
             IAID: 0ef46d04
             T1: 0
             T2: 0
             IA Address:  fd00:0:0:10::2000
                 Option: IA Address (5)
                 Length: 24
                 Value: fd0000000000001000000000000020000000119400001c20
                 IPv6 address: fd00:0:0:10::2000
                 Preferred lifetime: 4500
                 Valid lifetime: 7200

      Could someone explain why I am getting this strange behaviour ?

      I'm currently testing on a somewhat old release and will update and test again but still.
      Current version: 2.1-BETA0  Built On: Wed May 30 19:35:22 EDT 2012

      UPDATE 2012-06-12: I have now tested on latest build with same result.
      2.1-BETA0  Built On: Tue Jun 12 05:15:27 EDT 2012

      //Dan Lundqvist

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • D
        databeestje
        last edited by

        Strange, that's the range I normally create for interfaces which are setup as "track6".

        Maybe it's somehow not cleaning out a variable. I'll investigate.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M
          mrzaz
          last edited by

          Hi,

          Thanks for the response. :-)

          Do you think that you will have a correction for the tonight's build or later ?
          Just to know when I should test if the problem is gone and you could put that bug to rest. :-)

          Could you make a note here when a correction has been included and then I'll upgrade and test
          again to verify that the problem has been solved.

          Best regards
          Dan Lundqvist

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M
            mrzaz
            last edited by

            I have done a check now and from what I could see it is giving correct leases now within the span defined. :-)
            Using build Sat Jun 16 14:16:56 EDT 2012

            I have switched to a non Unique Local Addressing scheme to real Internet IPv6 addresses now so i have
            my own /64 Routed IPv6 Prefixes.  I have selected a ::2 to ::ffff span for the DHCP and it seems to give out
            within this scope to the clients when setting to Managed mode.

            So I think this problem has been resolved ?
            Unless there is a specific problem when using fd00:….  addresses.

            Best regards
            Dan Lundqvist
            Stockholm, Sweden

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • First post
              Last post
            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.