Build fails - ERROR Building libtool

podilarius

Down to 2 errors on the 2.0.1 builds. I will probably try the 2.1 builds tonight.

>>> Ports with failures:        2
>>> Building olsrd(olsrd-0.5.6.r7)...ERROR!
>>> Building ioncube(ioncube-4.0.12)...ERROR!
>>> Building athstats...main.c: In function 'getfmt':
main.c:73: warning: implicit declaration of function 'strcasecmp'
Done!
>>> Building tools/crytpo...Done!
==> End of pfPorts...

It still skips when it should not.

wagonza

I meant 'portsnap fetch update' for the ports tree.

Those two errors are expected. OLSRD will be moved and dont worry about ioncube.

podilarius

I will try that out on some 2.1 builds tonight, or is this only for the 2.0 series?

wagonza

That is for both.

ardunio

@wagonza:

I meant 'portsnap fetch update' for the ports tree.

Those two errors are expected. OLSRD will be moved and dont worry about ioncube.

Hi again. Like you said, these ports are failed. Even so I build an iso image and it works correctly now. But I'm worried about if it crashes.

podilarius

Mine also errors, but continues the build. I have run on them and everything seems just fine.

ardunio

@podilarius:

Mine also errors, but continues the build. I have run on them and everything seems just fine.

They still fail at me. What about you?

podilarius

I have not run a build in a few days, and since snapshots are behind (May 2nd is the latest), there is probably a problem.
Please post the exact error you are getting. This will help the developers fix the error.

jimp

There was no problem with the build process in general. Snapshots were only off because the ova build was grabbing a conflicting port to one that was already on the builders. All fixed up now.

olsrd is going to be moved out of base and back to a package, so don't worry too much about that (few people, if any, need/use it anyhow), and ioncube isn't necessary yet.

_Adrian_

Has anyone attempted a build with 9.0 ???
Wanting to try the Mellanox support with IPoIB

Thanks

jimp

Yes, there are even patches in there for 9, and it "mostly" works but there were many problems… random freezes, lots of things in the OS that we needed to code around (check redmine, there's a whole tree of 'em), formats of various things changed that need to be adjusted for.

So it might function, if you're lucky, but don't expect a miracle.

If it actually worked properly, we'd be using it.

_Adrian_

@jimp:

Yes, there are even patches in there for 9, and it "mostly" works but there were many problems… random freezes, lots of things in the OS that we needed to code around (check redmine, there's a whole tree of 'em), formats of various things changed that need to be adjusted for.

So it might function, if you're lucky, but don't expect a miracle.

If it actually worked properly, we'd be using it.

Thanks for the heads up…
I tried to register on redmine and had no luck.

I still would be interested on running it buggy or not at least it would generate logs that can be used for patches