Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    VLAN Tagged and Untagged traffic…

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    1 Posts 1 Posters 3.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • D Offline
      Deviant
      last edited by

      I know this question has been brought up numerous time and the answer has always been "don't mix tagged and untagged traffic"…in my curiousity and naiveness I would like to know why?

      I have this setup and have some strange behaviour, I am wondering whether this is due to the above issue, therefore I would greatly appreciate some advice :)

      I hope this makes sense...

      pfSense
      Public Internet    --- WAN(em0) --- LAN(em1) ------------------->
                                      |                      |                                     
                                      |                      | --- VLAN10(em1) ------>  [Switch] –- [Wireless Network (layer2 bridged AP's)] –--> Wireless AP's = No VLAN
                                      |                                                                                                                                                      Clients with NAT'd IP's = VLAN10
                                      (bridge) ------------- VLAN20(em1) ------>                                                                                          Clients with Public IP's = VLAN20

      Basically, we have three segmented 'networks'

      • No VLAN (untagged) is our management network so we can access all the network infrastructure i.e. Wireless AP's and Switches.
      • VLAN10 for clients who ONLY require a NAT'd local IP
      • VLAN20 for clients who require a public IP which we can bridge with WAN

      The tagging for clients is done on the wireless receivers or switches behind them.

      I would like to know if there is an issue with the above method or whether there is a more efficient way of setting this up.

      If I get the setup working I'll be more than willing to write a tutorial to help others!

      Regards,

      Dvnt.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • First post
        Last post
      Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.