Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Snort 2.9.2.3 pkg v. 2.5.1 service fails overnight, unable to restart

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved pfSense Packages
    65 Posts 14 Posters 22.7k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • F
      Fesoj
      last edited by

      blundar, onhel,
      does  it matter if you toggle the settings in Snort: Interface Preprocessors and Flow: General Preprocessor Settings: Enable SSL Data?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • B
        blundar
        last edited by

        I had it disabled when I was getting those errors.
        Enabling it fixed snort.botnet-cnc

        still getting errors on other once, mostly related to dce_iface

        Searching around these seem to be related to a conf issue so I'll keep digging.

        Thanks!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • C
          caustic386
          last edited by

          @blundar:

          I set up the package on 7/27 on PF2.01/Amd64

          When the updates processed (last night I think) things broke.  I removed the package, reinstalled about 3pm EST and it seems to have fixed things.  Just FYI.

          This is my exact setup, and I'm still having trouble after a few re-installs.  Fails overnight, restart manually is successful.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • B
            blundar
            last edited by

            I must eat my words!  Snort died again last night!

            from logs:

            
            20	snort[32228]: Initializing rule chains...
            Jul 31 12:03:20	snort[32228]: FATAL ERROR: /usr/local/etc/snort/snort_13690_em0/preproc_rules/sensitive-data.rules(1) Unknown ClassType: sdf
            Jul 31 12:03:20	snort[32228]: FATAL ERROR: /usr/local/etc/snort/snort_13690_em0/preproc_rules/sensitive-data.rules(1) Unknown ClassType: sdf
            Jul 31 12:03:20	php: : Snort has restarted with your new set of rules...
            Jul 31 12:03:20	kernel: em0: promiscuous mode disabled
            
            

            Unchecking the "sensitive-data" checkbox for the CC# check, etc. in preprocessors was enough to get snort running again, albeit without some useful checks.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • C
              caustic386
              last edited by

              @blundar:

              I must eat my words!  Snort died again last night!

              Unchecking the "sensitive-data" checkbox for the CC# check, etc. in preprocessors was enough to get snort running again, albeit without some useful checks.

              This is my exact same issue.  I'm not sure how to find logs for past snort events?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • B
                blundar
                last edited by

                Services… System logs.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • C
                  caustic386
                  last edited by

                  @blundar:

                  Services… System logs.

                  Unfortunately it only displays the last 50 events, which doesn't take me back to the overnight failure.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • F
                    Fesoj
                    last edited by

                    blundar,

                    the sdf problem is known for quite a while and if you search backwards in this thread you'll find a way of handling it.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • B
                      blundar
                      last edited by

                      you can change the number of lines using the settings tab.  I have mine set to 500.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • C
                        caustic386
                        last edited by

                        @blundar:

                        you can change the number of lines using the settings tab.  I have mine set to 500.

                        Thanks - can't believe I never noticed that.  I'll check it again first thing in the AM.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • C
                          Cino
                          last edited by

                          dumb question, is everyone seeing updated rules? Since Sunday, i've had the same hash:

                          SNORT.ORG >>>   "7017498f85ec6d0fc34c904c950ed8c1"
                          EMERGINGTHREATS.NET >>>   13611f17ed1c94d40c8f0a78566dbb90

                          I've been deleting the hash to force a manual update.. The auto update kicks off but nothing is downloaded since there isn't a new hash

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • C
                            caustic386
                            last edited by

                            @Cino:

                            dumb question, are is everyone seeing updated rules? Since Sunday, i've had the same hash:

                            SNORT.ORG >>>   "7017498f85ec6d0fc34c904c950ed8c1"
                            EMERGINGTHREATS.NET >>>   13611f17ed1c94d40c8f0a78566dbb90

                            I've been deleting the hash to force a manual update.. The auto update kicks off but nothing is downloaded since there isn't a new hash

                            Sunday-Monday was the only day snort did not fail during updates, so it's possible there just weren't any that night.  I can't account for Monday, however.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • J
                              judex
                              last edited by

                              You can check the actual MD5 Hash of "Only Registered Users" here:

                              http://www.snort.org/downloads/1778/show_md5

                              It is still:
                              "7017498f85ec6d0fc34c904c950ed8c1"

                              I am also checking that, because I also suspect snort to only update ET rules automatically. Manual updates work so far.

                              Greets, Judex

                              2.1-RELEASE (amd64)
                              built on Wed Sep 11 18:17:48 EDT 2013
                              FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p11

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • C
                                Cino
                                last edited by

                                auto update finally kicked for snort for me… 2 test boxes fresh installs of pfsense and snort...

                                box with using snort and et with sensitive data preprocessor enabled: failed to reload, the usually error everyone is seeing
                                box with using snort and et with sensitive data preprocessor disabled: reloaded fine

                                IMHO, I feel the sensitive preprocessor option should be removed from snort until a working fix can be applied to the package. or a warning that auto updates should be disabled and and to run updates manually

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • C
                                  caustic386
                                  last edited by

                                  Finally getting back to the original post, I think this is what's causing the issue:

                                  kernel: pid 31475 (snort), uid 0, was killed: out of swap space

                                  As a test, I disabled updates.  As expected, snort ran fine until I did a manual update.  The error above was what showed up after running the update.  Restarting snort by hand brought success.

                                  Is the swap space error helpful?  I do not have a swap partition on my install, as I have significant excess RAM.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.